The Metaphysics of Touch: Remarks on the Margins of Richard Kearney’s Touch

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.65.05

Keywords:

Kearney, dotyk, fenomenologia, ekskarnacja

Abstract

This paper examines Richard Kearney’s book Touch: Recovering our most vital sense, analysing how Kearney positions touch as our most fundamental sense in an increasingly digital and disembodied world. The author first contextualizes Kearney’s work within recent empirical and philosophical research on touch, comparing it with approaches by Fulkerson, Linden, Banissy, and Classen. The paper then explores Kearney’s central concept of tact, which represents a special bodily intelligence that precedes abstract knowledge and serves as the foundation for all sensory experience. Through philosophical analysis drawing on Aristotle and phenomenological traditions, Kearney challenges the dominant Western opto-centric tradition that privileges sight over touch. The author highlights Kearney’s argument that touch has healing potential through the archetype of the “wounded healer” and discusses how Kearney proposes a balanced integration of physical and virtual experiences to counter the modern process of excarnation (i.e. disembodiment). The paper concludes that Kearney’s rehabilitation of touch represents not just a philosophical project but an urgent cultural imperative for reintegrating our individualized selves and communities through embodied contact.

References

Banissy, M. (2023). Touch Matters: Handshakes, Hugs, and the New Science on How Touch Can Enhance Your Well-Being. San Francisco: Chronicle Prism.
View in Google Scholar

Classen, C. (Ed.) (2005). The Book of Touch. Oxford: Berg.
View in Google Scholar

Classen, C. (2012). The Deepest Sense. A Cultural History of Touch. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252034930.001.0001
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252034930.001.0001

Derrida, J. (2005). On Touching – Jean-Luc Nancy. Trans. Ch. Irizarry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Fulkerson, M. (2021). The First Sense: A Philosophical Study of Human Touch. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Kearney, R. (2010). Anatheism: Returning to God after God. New York: Columbia University Press. (Wyd. polskie: Anateizm. Powrót do Boga po Bogu. Przeł. T. Sieczkowski. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8331-436-5
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8331-436-5

Kearney, R. (2021). Touch. Recovering our most vital sense. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/kear19952
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/kear19952

Linden, D. J. (2016). Touch: The Science of Hand, Heart, and Mind. London: Penguin Books.
View in Google Scholar

Nancy, J.-L. (2005) Salut to you, salut to the blind we become, w: Derrida. On Touching (313-314). Trans. Ch. Irizarry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Fulkerson, M. (2021). The First Sense: A Philosophical Study of Human Touch. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Schellenberg, J. L. (2009). The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Schellenberg, J. L. (2013). Evolutionary Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Wyd. polskie: Religia ewolucyjna. Przeł. T. Sieczkowski. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673766.001.0001
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673766.001.0001

Published

2025-11-24

How to Cite

Sieczkowski, T. (2025). The Metaphysics of Touch: Remarks on the Margins of Richard Kearney’s Touch. Hybris, 65(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.65.05

Issue

Section

Articles