Philosophy of nature and culture and its role in shaping Humankind’s attitude to nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.23.05Abstract
We live in an era of crises. One of them, the ecological crisis, arose from the fact that the human race plunders nature, destroying, among other things, the Earth’s biodiversity. In my paper I will show that the situation is rooted in a specific worldview. Moreover, I will interrogate the question of how we can deal with the problem.
Humankind’s attitude to themselves and to the world (including nature) is based on beliefs and values which make up an unquestioned prejudgment. Individuals absorb it in the process of socialization, as they assimilate the widely understood traditions of the social groups to which they belong. In the Western tradition in particular, our understanding of humanity’s situation in the world and its relation to nature, which we have had since modernity, found its clearest articulation in the views of René Descartes (1596–1650). I will begin by discussing the main characteristics of this position most pertinent to the main problem identified in the title.
Then I will discuss the consequences of Cartesianism for the worldview of modern man such as the radical rationalism and anthropocentrism inherent in the European attitude. In this tradition humanity is identified with subjectivity and intellectual cognition. Reality outside of human subjectivity, that is, the whole animate and inanimate nature, is treated as the object of knowledge. Nature should be explored in the spirit of modernity’s maxim “We can do as much as we know” (F. Bacon 1561-1626); it can be used to our purposes, to satisfy our growing needs. This is being done without scruple, precisely because nature is denied being the subject. It has no right to claim moral protection.
Today, in the era of globalization, this way of thinking, which originated in the West, has spread over the entire globe and led to the ongoing devastation of nature. We are dealing with an ecological disaster.
In the next step I will interrogate how this situation can be changed and what may be the role of philosophy in this cultural shift. Every vision of the world is a construct (the Cartesian vision being a very good example). What philosophy can do is offer a certain vision of reality, in which humanity has a friendly (symbiotic) attitude to nature and does not treat it merely as a means to their ends. Such ecophilosophy could be based on the thesis that subjectivity is the property not just of all human beings, but of all other beings as well. Such an idea can be found in the work of the German scientist and philosopher Jacob von Uexküll (1864-1944), who granted the status of the subject to every living being. He laid foundations to the concept of nature as “a community of subjects” comprising man and the entire animate world, thus breaking away from the Cartesian framework. I am going to outline briefly his position.
Finally, I will point out what needs to be done, if people are to change their attitude to nature. A good theory in and of itself will not suffice. It is necessary to instill ecological convictions and values in entire societies, so that these values would eventually come to seem obvious. We need to launch an extensive education campaign of both adults and—perhaps even more importantly—children. In other words, the comprehensive protection of nature can only be promoted through the nexus of ecophilosophy and education.
References
Bogusławski, M. M., 2011, Ekologia polityczna czy „umowa naturalna”, czyli co Bruno Latour i Michel Serres mają nam do powiedzenia o splocie polityki i natury „SOCIETAS/COMMUNITAS” 1(11) 2011, S. 85-105.
View in Google Scholar
Descartes, R., 1637, Meditationes de prima philosophia urs de la methode (Pour bien conduire sa raison, et chercher la vérité dans les sciences)
View in Google Scholar
Descartes, R., 1641, Meditationes de prima philosophia.
View in Google Scholar
Devall B., Sessions G., 1985, Deep Ecology. Living as if Nature Mattered.
View in Google Scholar
Ferry, L., 1992, New Ecological Order, University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar
Ferry, L., 1993, Od panowania nad naturą do naturalizacji człowieka – uwagi do Heideggerowskiej krytyki techniki. „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica” 10, (37-46).
View in Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1950, Die Zeit des Weltbildes. In: Holzwege, M. Heidegger, Frankfurt am Main.
View in Google Scholar
Kroeber A. L., Kluckhon C., 1952, Culture a Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, Cambridge Mass.
View in Google Scholar
Latour, B., 2009, Polityka natury, przeł. A. Czarnecka, Warszawa, Krytyka Polityczna.
View in Google Scholar
Latour, B., Serres M., 1995, Converastions on Science, Culture and Time, przeł. R. Lapidus, Michigan, Ann Arbor.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9736
Pobojewska, A., 1987, Naturalismus - Antinaturalismus – Kulturalismus: „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Philosophica” 4, s. 81-101.
View in Google Scholar
Pobojewska, A., 1987, Eine Natur - viele Kulturen, eine Kultur - viele Naturen, w: Einheit und Vielheit. XIV. Deutscher Kongreß für Philosophie (ed.) Marquard O., Probst P., Gießen.
View in Google Scholar
Pobojewska, A., 1993, Die Subjektlehre Jacob von Uexkülls, Sudhoffs Archiv, Band 77, Heft 1, s. 54- 71.
View in Google Scholar
Pobojewska, A., 2001, New biology – Jakob von Uexküll's Umweltlehre, Walter de Gruyter „Semiotica”, 134 ¬ 1/4, s. 323–339.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2001.031
Renaut, A., 1989, L’ère de l’individu. Contribution à une histoire de la subjectivité, Gallimard .
View in Google Scholar
Serres, M., 1995, The Natural Contract, przeł. E. MacArthur & W. Paulson, Michigan, Ann Arbor.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9725
Serres, M., 2009, On a oublié d’inviter la Terre à la conference sur le climat, „Le Monde”: http://www.lemonde.fr/le-rechauffement-climatique/article/2009/12/21/michel-serres-on-a-oublie-d-inviter-la-terre-a-la-conference-sur-le-climat_1283576_1270066.html (20.08.2011).
View in Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. v., 1920, Theoretische Biologie, Frankfurt/M 1973.
View in Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. v., 1921, Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere, Berlin.
View in Google Scholar
Uexküll, J.v.,1922, Wie sehen wir die Natur und wie sieht sie sich selber, in: T. v. Uexküll (ed.) Kompositionslehre der Natur. Biologie als undogmatische Naturwissenschaft. Ausgewählte Schriften Jacob von Uexkülls, Frankfurt a.M. 1980.
View in Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. v., 1931, Die Rolle des Subjekts in der Biologie, in: T. v. Uexküll (ed.) Kompositionslehre der Natur. Biologie als undogmatische Naturwissenschaft. Ausgewählte Schriften Jacob von Uexkülls, Frankfurt a.M. 1980.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.