Embodied cognition: looking inward
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.38.06Keywords:
embodied cognition, bodily cognitive system, internal and cognitive processing, B-codes, E-codesAbstract
The body is a highly complex, coordinated system engaged in coping with many environmental problems. It can be considered as some sort of opportunity or obstacle, with which internal processing must deal. Internal processing must take into account the possibilities and limitations of the particular body. In other words, even if the body is not involved in the realization of some cognitive explicit task, it is not a neutral factor of our understanding of why a system solves a task in one way or another. Therefore, when conducting research on embodiment and the body’s cognitive system we should not neglect internal, cognitive processing.
I appeal to Goldman’s research on embodied cognition to sketch the broader framework for internal processing in embodied cognition. I believe that even if we don’t accept Goldman’s approach as the viable proposal for embodied cognition in general, it’s a quite natural starting point for our analysis. Goldman (2012; 2014, and with de Vignemont 2009) argue for the essential role of the bodily formats or bodily codes (respectively: B-formats and B-codes) in embodied cognition. B-codes are here described as the processing of regions or sub-regions of the central nervous system. They are primarily employed for body control or monitoring, and reused for cognitive tasks. Beyond doubt, this conception provides an excellent starting point for analyzing the internal (mostly neural) processing in cases of embodied cognition.
At the end of this paper, I will argue that the embodiment of cognition needs a conceptual twist. Following Keijzer’s (2015) interest in the evolution of the nervous system, and the minimal forms of cognition, I argue that in investigating embodied cognition, we should investigate the role played by cognitive processing for specific kinds of organisms, meaning organisms with a body of a particular morphology (size, shape, kinds, and distribution of sensors and effectors). Doing that, I refer to some conceptual and empirical considerations. I will also try to show that research on embodied cognition is still not sufficiently anchored in evolutionary and comparative studies on cognition, nor on the nervous system and body morphology. Bigger reliance on these kinds of studies, will make it make possible to gain a deeper understanding of internal processing in embodied cognition.
References
Aizawa, K. (2015a). Cognition and behavior. Synthese, 1-20. doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0645-5
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0645-5
Aizawa, K. (2015b). What is this cognition that is supposed to be embodied?. Philosophical Psychology, 28(6), 755-775.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.875280
Aizawa, K. (2014). The enactivist revolution. AVANT. Pismo Awangardy Filozoficzno-Naukowej, (2), 19-42.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26913/50202014.0109.0002
Allen, M., Friston, K. J. (2016). From cognitivism to autopoiesis: towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese, 1-24.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1288-5
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(4), 245-266.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000853
Anderson, M. L. (2007). Massive redeployment, exaptation, and the functional integration of cognitive operations. Synthese, 159(3), 329-345.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9233-2
Bolt, T., Nomi, J. S., Yeo, B. T., Uddin, L. Q. (2017). Data-Driven Extraction of a Nested Model of Human Brain Function. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(30), 7263-7277.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0323-17.2017
Bruineberg, J., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2016). The anticipating brain is not a scientist: The free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective. Synthese, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1239-1
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1239-1
Buckner, C. (2015). A property cluster theory of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 28(3), 307-336.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.843274
Burr, C., Jones, M. (2016). The body as laboratory: Prediction-error minimization, embodiment, and representation. Philosophical Psychology, 29(4), 586-600.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2015.1135238
Caramazza, A., Anzellotti, S., Strnad, L., Lingnau, A. (2014). Embodied cognition and mirror neurons: a critical assessment. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37,1–15.doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013- 013950
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-013950
Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217013.001.0001
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181-204.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
de Bruin, L., Michael, J. (2017). Prediction error minimization: Implications for embodied cognition and the extended mind hypothesis. Brain and cognition, 112, 58-63.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.01.009
Denève, S., Alemi, A., Bourdoukan, R. (2017). The brain as an efficient and robust adaptive learner. Neuron, 94(5), 969-977.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.016
Depraz N. (2005). Radical embodiment, in. H. de Preester, V. Knockaert (ed.), Body image and body schema: interdisciplinary perspectives on the body (173 – 186), Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.62.11dep
Durgin, F. H., Klein, B., Spiegel, A., Strawser, C. J., Williams, M. (2012). The social psychology of perception experiments: Hills, backpacks, glucose, and the problem of generalizability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1582.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027805
Firestone, C. (2016) Embodiment in Perception. in. B. P. McLaughlin and H. Kornblith (eds.) Goldman and His Critics (318-334), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118609378.ch15
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2014). “Top-down” effects where none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological science, 25(1), 38-46.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613485092
Fuchs, T. (2011). The Brain – A Mediating Organ. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(7-8), 196-221.
View in Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2015a). How embodied cognition is being disembodied. The Philosophers' Magazine, (68), 96-102.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm20156819
Gallagher, S. (2015b). Reuse and body-formatted representations in simulation theory. Cognitive Systems Research, 34, 35-43.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2015.07.003
Gallagher, S., Hutto, D. D., Slaby, J., Cole, J. (2013). The brain as part of an enactive system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 421-422.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002105
Glenberg, A.M., M.F. Kaschak. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9, 558–565.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2002). Environmental complexity, signal detection, and the evolution of cognition, in. M. Bekoff, C. Allen, G.M. Burghardt (eds.) The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition, (135-142) Cambridge: The MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (1996). Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172714
Goldinger, S. D., Papesh, M. H., Barnhart, A. S., Hansen, W. A., Hout, M. C. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 23(4), 959-978.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1
Goldman, A. I. (2016). Response to Firestone. in. B. P. McLaughlin and H. Kornblith (eds.) Goldman and His Critics (335-336), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
View in Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2014). The bodily formats approach to embodied cognition, in. U. Kriegel (ed.) Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind, (91-108), Routledge.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203116623-4
Goldman, A. I. (2012). A moderate approach to embodied cognitive science. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(1), 71-88.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0089-0
Goldman, A., de Vignemont, F. (2009). Is social cognition embodied?. Trends in cognitive sciences, 13(4), 154-159.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.007
Haselager, P., van Dijk, J., & van Rooij, I. (2008). A lazy brain? Embodied embedded cognition and cognitive neuroscience. in. P. Calvo, T. Gomila (eds.) Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach, ed. (273-287), Elsevier Science.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00014-1
Hooper S.L. (2012). Body size and the neural control of movement, Current Biology, 22(9), R318-R322.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.048
Jacob, P. (2012). Embodying the mind by extending it. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(1), 33-51.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0087-2
Jékely, G., Keijzer, F., Godfrey-Smith, P. (2015). An option space for early neural evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 370(1684), 20150181.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0181
Keijzer, F. (2015). Moving and sensing without input and output: early nervous systems and the origins of the animal sensorimotor organization. Biology & Philosophy, 30(3), 311-331.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9483-1
Keijzer, F. (2003). Making decisions does not suffice for minimal cognition. Adaptive Behavior, 11(4), 266-269.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712303114006
Keijzer, F., Arnellos, A. (2017). The animal sensorimotor organization: a challenge for the environmental complexity thesis. Biology & Philosophy, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9565-3
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9565-3
Kubanek, J., Snyder, L.H. (2015). Reward-based decision signals in parietal cortex are partially embodied. J.Neurosci. 35,4869–4881.doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4618-14.2015
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4618-14.2015
Kyselo, M., Di Paolo, E. (2015). Locked-in syndrome: a challenge for embodied cognitive science. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 14(3), 517-542.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9344-9
Laughlin, S. B. (2001). Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information. Current opinion in neurobiology, 11(4), 475-480.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00237-3
MacIver, M. A. (2009). Neuroethology: From Morphological Computation to Planning. in. P. Robbins, M. Aydede (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (480-504), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.026
Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S.R., Bahrami, B., Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: are view of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex 48, 788–804.doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
Milner, A. D., Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Miłkowski, M. (2016). Models of Environment. In Frantz, R., Marsh, L. (eds.) Minds, Models and Milieux (227-238). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442505_13
Niven, J. E. (2016). Neuronal energy consumption: biophysics, efficiency and evolution. Current opinion in neurobiology, 41, 129-135.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.09.004
Nowakowski P.R. (2015). Commentary: The Embodied Brain: Towards a Radical Embodied Cognitive Neuroscience. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:623. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00623
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00623
Nowakowski P.R. (2017). Bodily processing: the role of morphological computation, Entropy, 19(7), 295; doi:10.3390/e19070295
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e19070295
Proffitt, D.R. (2008). An action-specific approach to spatial perception. in. R.L. Katzky, B. MacWhinney, M. Behrmann (eds.) Embodiment, ego-space, and action, (177-200), Psychology Press
View in Google Scholar
Proffitt, D.R., Linkenauger. S.A. (2012). Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression. in.W. Prinz, M. Beisert, A. Herwig. (eds.) Action Science. Foundations of an Emerging Discipline. (171-198) Cambridge: MIT press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018555.003.0007
Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 576–582.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706
Rupert, R. D. (2016). Embodied Functionalism and Inner Complexity: Simon’s Twenty-first Century Mind. In Frantz, R., Marsh, L. (eds.) Minds, Models and Milieux (7-33). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442505_2
Shapiro, L. A. (2014). When is Cognition Embodied, in. Uriah Kriegel (ed.) Current Controversies in Philosophy of Mind (73-90) Routledge,
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203116623-3
Shapiro, L. A. (2010). Embodied cognition, Routlege.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850664
Shapiro, L. A. (2004). The mind incarnate. Cambridge: MIT press.
View in Google Scholar
Shaffer, D. M., McManama, E., Swank, C., Durgin, F. H. (2013). Sugar and space? Not the case: Effects of low blood glucose on slant estimation are mediated by beliefs. I-Perception, 4(3), 147-155.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/i0592
Trestman, M. (2013). The Cambrian explosion and the origins of embodied cognition. Biological Theory, 8(1), 80-92.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-013-0102-6
Van Duijn, M., Keijzer, F., Franken, D. (2006). Principles of minimal cognition: Casting cognition as sensorimotor coordination. Adaptive Behavior, 14(2), 157-170.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105971230601400207
Wang, I. E., Clandinin, T. R. (2016). The influence of wiring economy on nervous system evolution. Current Biology, 26(20), R1101-R1108.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.053
Wilson, R. A. (2010). Extended vision, in. Gangopadhyay, N., Madary, M., Spicer, F.(ed.) Perception, action and consciousness, (277-290). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199551118.003.0015
Wilson, R. A. (1994). Wide computationalism. Mind, 103(411), 351-372.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/103.411.351
Wilson, R.A., Foglia, L. (2011/2017). Embodied Cognition, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/
View in Google Scholar
Wilson A.D., Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Front. Psychology 4:58. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
