Pośmiertne interesy osoby

Stanisław Jędrczak

doi:10.18778/1689-4286.43.06

Authors

Stanisław Jędrczak Uniwersytet Warszawski

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1689-4286.43.06

Keywords:

personal stance, interest, personal wrights, proleptic, ante mortem

Abstract

Does the interest of a person go beyond the limits of her life? In the article we advocate the realistic view, proclaiming that interests of a person continues even after her death. In contemporary philosophy the realistic view of the post-mortem interests, already outlined by Aristotle, had been delivered by Joel Feinberg. The paper associates an ontological thread with a moral philosophy and general reflection on the notion of a person. Developing the Timothy Chappell’s idea, we introduce the term of personal stance, which is an aspect of the proleptic nature of the concept of a person. Since personal stance includes also a dead person, she belongs to the primary moral constituency. This fact clarifies our concern for the posthumous fate. Lastly, we argue that in the light of private law posthumous interests are to be understood as personal rights.

References

Arystoteles (1955). Etyka Nikomachejska I.10-11, par. 2, tłum. D. Gromska, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Chappell T. (2011). On the Very Idea of Personhood, „The Southern Journal of Philosophy”, 49/2011, s. 1-27.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2010.00042.x

Dennett D. (2015). Dźwignie wyobraźni i inne narzędzia do myślenia, tłum. T. Kwiatek, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Höffe O. (1995). Immanuel Kant, tłum. M. Kaniowski, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Ihering R. von (1894). Walka o prawa, Petersburg.
View in Google Scholar

Ingarden R. (1989). Wykłady z etyki, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Lewis D. (1986). On Plurality of Worlds, Blackwell.
View in Google Scholar

Longchamps de Bérier R. (1911). Studya nad istotą osoby prawniczej, Lwów.
View in Google Scholar

Moore G. E. (1919). Zasady etyki, tłum. Cz. Znamierowski, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Olson E. (2013). The Person and the Corpse [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Death, red. B. Bradley, F. Feldman, J. Johansson, s. 80-97.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195388923.013.0004

Odrowąż-Sypniewska Joanna (2011). Istnienie i identyczność [w:] Przewodnik po metafizyce, red. S. T. Kołodziejczak, Kraków, s. 87-127.
View in Google Scholar

Quine W. (2000). Otym, co istnieje [w:] Tegoż, Z punktu widzenia logiki, tłum. B. Stanosz, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Rousseau J. J. (1996). List o widowiskach [w:] Tegoż, Umowa społeczna, tłum. W. Bieńkowska, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Reale G. (1999). Historia filozofii starożytnej, t. III, tłum. I. Zieliński, Lublin.
View in Google Scholar

Scarre G. (2007). Death, Acumen.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653874

Sperling D. (2008). Posthumous Interests, Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Stelmachowski A. (1998). Zarys teorii prawa cywilnego, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Swieżawski S. (2000). Dzieje europejskiej filozofii klasycznej, Warszawa– Wrocław.
View in Google Scholar

Trendelenburg A. (1910). The Contribution to the History of the Word Person, „The Monist” vol. 20 (3), s. 336-363.
View in Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist191020348

Wolniewicz B. (1993). Myśl Elzenberga [w:] Filozofia i wartości, Warszawa, s. 69-95.
View in Google Scholar

Wolniewicz B. (2011). OPolsce i życiu, Komorów.
View in Google Scholar