Responsible consumption in the light of research results

Authors

  • Dorota Teneta-Skwiercz Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych, Katedra Ekonomiki i Organizacji Przedsiębiorstwa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1429-3730.51.04

Keywords:

Responsible consumption, sustainable development, ecological awareness

Abstract

The aim of the article was to identify attitudes towards the protection of the natural environment and practices of pro-environmental activities. The study attempted to answer the following questions: What is the level of ecological awareness of respondents? In particular, do they have ecological knowledge and imagination? What is their sense of agency in the area of individually undertaken actions for the benefit of the environment? What are the most important criteria for shopping? What is the position of pro-environmental and pro-social criteria in this collection? What kind of environmental activities are taken by respondents in their daily lives? To answer the above questions, a survey was conducted directly from primary sources among students of three faculties of the University of Economics in Wroclaw. Studies have shown that respondents are characterized by an average level of ecological awareness, while in men the level of this awareness, as well as the sense of efficiency of individual pro-ecological activities, are slightly lower than in women. Both surveyed women and men similarly prioritize the criteria for purchasing products. The pro-environmental criteria are perceived by them as less important. There were no significant differences between men and women in the field of activities undertaken for the benefit of the environment.

References

Burgiel A., Postawy konsumentów wobec zachowań z zakresu konsumpcji wspólnej – czy ekonomia współdzielona ma szanse na upowszechnienie?, Studia i Prace WNEiZ Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2016, nr 44/2.
Google Scholar

Bylok F., Konsument, konsumpcja i społeczeństwo konsumpcyjne we współczesnym świecie, Śląsk, Katowice 2013.
Google Scholar

Bywalec Cz., Rudnicki L., Konsumpcja, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar

Carrigan M., Attalla A., The Myth of The Ethical Consumer – Do Ethics Matter in Purchase Behaviour? „Journal of Consumer Marketing” 2001, nr 18 (7).
Google Scholar

Dobson A., Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.
Google Scholar

GfK Polonia, Badanie świadomości ekologicznej Polaków. Raport dla Bayer Sp. z o.o. Październik 2005. http://www.eduskrypt.pl (2008).
Google Scholar

Hull Z., Świadomość ekologiczna (II), „Aura” 1984, nr 11.
Google Scholar

Kieżel E. (red.), Konsument i jego zachowania na rynku europejskim, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar

Mariański J., Społeczeństwo i moralność. Studia z katolickiej nauki społecznej i socjologii moralności, Biblios, Tarnów 2008.
Google Scholar

Sztompka P., Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa, Znak, Kraków 2002.
Google Scholar

Terlau W., Hirsch D., Sustainable Consumption and the Attitude-Behaviour-Gap Phenomenon – Causes and Measurements towards a Sustainable Development, http://centmapress.ilb.uni-bonn.de [dostęp: 20.08.2017].
Google Scholar

The Norwegian Ministry of the Environment organized a symposium on sustainable production and consumption in 1994, http://www.iisd.ca/consume/oslo000.html [dostęp: 10.09.2017].
Google Scholar

Tkaczyk St., Kołuda J., Nowe trendy konsumenckie a sukces organizacji, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczo-Humanistycznego w Siedlcach”, nr 97, Seria: Administracja i Zarządzanie (24) 2013.
Google Scholar

UNEP, Planning for change: Guidelines for national programmes on sustainable consumption and production. United Nations Environment Programme 2008.
Google Scholar

Zieliński P., Wyzwanie edukacyjne: zmiana świadomości ekologicznej warunkiem ciągłości gatunku ludzkiego, „Podstawy Edukacji ” 2009, t 2.
Google Scholar

Published

2019-07-16

How to Cite

Teneta-Skwiercz, D. (2019). Responsible consumption in the light of research results. Gospodarka W Praktyce I Teorii, 51(2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.18778/1429-3730.51.04

Issue

Section

Articles