Kierunki przebudowy systemu podatkowego w Polsce. Propozycja prowzrostowa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.353.05Słowa kluczowe:
podatki, system podatkowy, propozycja prowzrostowej zmianyAbstrakt
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie kierunków przebudowy systemu podatkowego w Polsce, która wzmacniałaby wzrost gospodarczy. Opracowanie zawiera diagnozę głównych silnych stron i słabości tego systemu. Na podstawie tej diagnozy oraz przeglądu literatury autorzy proponują rekomendacje, których uwzględnienie przy przebudowie podatków sprzyjałoby wzrostowi gospodarczemu. Obejmują one: przesunięcie ciężaru opodatkowania z dochodów, zwłaszcza z nisko płatnej pracy, na konsumpcję; objęcie części składek na ubezpieczenie społeczne kwotą wolną; umożliwienie samorządom podwyższenia kwoty wolnej od podatku PIT powyżej centralnie ustalonej kwoty bazowej; ujednolicenie podstawy wymiaru podatku PIT, składek NFZ i ZUS; usunięcie różnic w oskładkowaniu różnych typów umów, na podstawie których jest wykonywana praca; rozszerzenie możliwości jednorazowej amortyzacji na wszystkie inwestycje maszynowe; eliminację podatków sektorowych.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Afonso A., Allegre J. G. (2011), Economic Growth and Budgetary Components: A Panel Assessment for the EU, “Empirical Economics”, vol. 41(3), pp. 703–723.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-010-0400-9
Afonso A., Jalles J. T. (2014), Fiscal composition and long‑term growth, “Applied Economics”, vol. 46(3), pp. 349–358.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.848030
Afonso A., Schuknecht L., Tanzi V. (2003), Public sector efficiency: an international comparison, “ECB Working Paper”, no. 242.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.434002
Afonso A., Schuknecht L., Tanzi V. (2006), Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence for New EU Member States and Emerging Markets, “ECB Working Paper”, no. 581.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.876945
Aiginger K., Falk M. (2005), Explaining Differences in Economic Growth Among OECD Countries, “Empirica”, no. 32, pp. 19–43.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-005-1977-7
Aizeman J., Glick R. (2003), Military Expenditure, Threats, And Growth, “FRBSF Working Paper”, 2003–2008.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w9618
Arnold J. (2008), Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence From a Panel of OECD Countries, “OECD Economics Department Working Paper”, no. 643.
Google Scholar
Aschauer D. A. (1989a), Is Public Expenditure Productive?, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, vol. 23(2), pp. 177–200.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0
Aschauer D. A. (1989b), Public Investment and Productivity Growth in the Group of Seven, “Economic Perspectives”, vol. 13(5), pp. 17–25.
Google Scholar
Aschauer D. A. (1989c), Does Public Capital Crowd Out Private Capital?, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, vol. 24(2), pp. 171–188.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90002-0
Aschauer D. A. (2000a), Public Capital and Economic Growth: Issues of Quantity, Finance, and Efficiency, “Economic Development and Cultural Change”, vol. 48(2), pp. 391–406.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/452464
Aschauer D. A. (2000b), Do States Optimize? Public Capital And Economic Growth, “Annals of Regional Science”, vol. 34(3), pp. 343–363.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001689900016
Aslund A., Djankov S. (2014), The Great Rebirth: Lessons from the Victory of Capitalism Over Communism, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington.
Google Scholar
Atkinson A. B. (1999), The Economic Consequences of Rolling Back the Welfare State, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Baffes J., Shah A. (1998), Productivity of Public Spending, Sectoral Allocation Choices, and Economic Growth, “Economic Development and Cultural Change”, vol. 46(2), pp. 291–303.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/452339
Bakker B. B., Gulde A. M. (2010), The Credit Boom in the EU New Member States: Bad Luck or Bad Policies?, “IMF Working Paper”, no. 10/130.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781455201136.001
Balcerowicz L. (1995), Socialism, Capitalism, Transformation, Central European University Press, Budapest.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7829/j.ctv280b73c
Baldacci E., Clemens B., Gupta S., Cui Q. (2004), Social Spending, Human Capital, and Growth in Developing Countries: Implications for Achieving MDGs, “IMF Working Paper”, no. 04/217.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451875140.001
Barro R. J., Sala‑i‑Martin X. (1991), Convergence Across States and Regions, “Brookings Papers on Economic Activity”, vol. 22(1), pp. 107–182.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2534639
Bergh A., Henrekson M. (2011), Government Size and Growth: A Survey and Interpretation of the Evidence, “Journal of Economic Surveys”, vol. 25(5), pp. 872–897.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00697.x
Bergh A., Henrekson M. (2016), Government Size And Growth: A Rejoinder, “Journal of Economic Surveys”, vol. 30(2), pp. 393–396.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12103
Besley T., Coate S. (2003), Centralized versus Decentralized Provision of Local Public Goods: A Political Economy Approach, “Journal of Public Economics”, vol. 87(12), pp. 2611–2637.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00141-X
Bird R. M., Smart M. (2002), Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries, “World Development”, vol. 30(6), pp. 899–912.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00016-5
Bleaney M., Gemmell N., Kneller R. (2001), Testing the Endogenous Growth Model: Public Expenditure, Taxation, and Growth Over Long Run, “Canadian Journal of Economics”, vol. 34(1), pp. 26–57.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00061
Braguinsky S., Branstetter L., Regateiro A. (2011), The Incredible Shrinking Portuguese Firm, “NBER Working Paper”, no. 17265.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w17265
Bukowski M., Morawski I., Trzeciakowski R. (2016), Zrozumiały i prosty VAT. Korzyści z ujednoliconych stawek, WiseEuropa, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
CASE (2016), Study and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU–28 Member States: 2016 Final Report, Center for Social and Economic Research, Warsaw.
Google Scholar
Castany L., López‑Bazo E., Moreno R. (2005), Differences in total factor productivity across firm size. A distributional analysis, Paper presented at ERSA 2005 – 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Amsterdam, 23–27 August.
Google Scholar
Ciżkowicz, P., Rzońca, A. (2011), Mechanizmy oddziaływania deficytu fiskalnego na wzrost gospodarki, “Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics”, vol. 251(10), pp. 1–20.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/101064
Clemente J., Marcuello C., Montañés A. (2012), Government Social Spending and GDP: Has There Been a Change in Social Policy?, “Applied Economics”, vol. 44(22), pp. 2895–2905.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.568401
Corlett W. J., Hague D. C. (1953), Complementarity and The Excess Burden of Taxation, “Review of Economic Studies”, vol. 21(1), pp. 21–30.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296257
Dahlby B. (2003), Restructuring The Canadian Tax System By Changing The Mix Of Direct And Indirect Taxes, [in:] H. G. Grubel (ed.), Tax Reform in Canada: Our Path to Greater Prosperity, Fraser Institute, Vancouver, pp. 77–108.
Google Scholar
De Long B., Summers L. (1991), Equipment Investment and Economic Growth, “Journal of Economics”, vol. 106(2), pp. 445–502.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2937944
Disney R. (2000), The impact of Tax and Welfare Policies on Employment and Unemployment in OECD Countries, “IMF Working Paper”, no. 00/164.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451857986.001
Easterly W., Rebelo S. (1993), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: an Empirical Investigation, “NBER Working Paper”, no. 4499.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4499
European Commission (2006), Macroeconomic Effects of a Shift From Direct To Indirect Taxation: A Simulation for 15 EU Member States, Note presented by the European Commission services (DG TAXUD) at the 72nd meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Tax Policy Analysis and Tax Statistics, Paris, 14–16 November.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2015a), The 2015 Ageing Report: Economic And Budgetary Projections for The EU–27 Member States 2013–2060, Brussels.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2015b), VAT rates, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/vat/eu-vat-rules-topic/vat-rates_en [accessed: 3.05.2021].
Google Scholar
European Commission (2021), Taxation and customs union. Data on taxation, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/business/economic-analysis-taxation/data-taxation_en [accessed: 3.05.2021].
Google Scholar
Eurostat (2021a), General Government Expenditure By Function, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Government_expenditure_by_function_%E2%80%93_COFOG [accessed: 3.05.2021].
Google Scholar
Eurostat (2021b), Government revenue, expenditure and main aggregates, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/gov_10a_main/default/table?lang=en [accessed: 3.05.2021].
Google Scholar
Feldstein M. (1973), On The Optimal Progressivity of the Income Tax, “Journal of Public Economics”, vol. 2(4), pp. 357–376.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(73)90026-1
Forum Obywatelskiego Rozwoju (2015), Następne 25 lat: Jakie reformy musimy przeprowadzić, by dogonić Zachód?, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Friesenbichler K., Fritz O., Hölzl W., Misch F., Streicher G., Yeter M. (2014), The Efficiency Of EU Public Administration in Helping Firms Grow, European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry, Brussels.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2939518
Frye T. (2001), Keeping Shop. The Value of the Rule of Law in Warsaw and in Moscow, [in:] P. Murell (ed.), Assessing the Value of the Law in Transition Economies, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 229–248.
Google Scholar
Gale W. G., Orszag P. R. (2003), The economic effects of long-term fiscal discipline, “Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Centre Discussion Paper”, no. 8.
Google Scholar
Gemmell N., Kneller R., Sanz I. (2011), The Timing and Persistence of Fiscal Policy Impacts on Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries, “Economic Journal”, vol. 121(1), pp. F33–F58.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02414.x
Gemmell N., Kneller R., Sanz I. (2014), The Growth Effects of Tax Rates In The OECD, “Canadian Journal of Economics”, vol. 47(4), pp. 1217–1255.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12105
Government Accountability Office (2011), Value‑Added Taxes. Potential Lessons For The United States From Other Countries’ Experiences, United States Government Accountability Office Report, GAO–11–867T.
Google Scholar
Grant Thornton (2017a), Podatki w Polsce, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Grant Thornton (2017b), Produkcja prawa w Polsce największa w historii, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Grant Thornton (2017c), Fiskus nadal nie ma wątpliwości, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Griffith R., Redding S. J., Van Reenen J. M. (2005), Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries, “Review of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 86(4), pp. 883–895.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125194
Gyimah‑Brempong K., Wilson M. (2004), Health, Human Capital And Economic Growth in Sub‑Saharan African and OECD Countries, “Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance”, no. 44, pp. 296–320.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2003.07.002
Hansson P., Henrekson M. (1994), A New Framework for Testing the Effect of Government Spending on Growth and Productivity, “Public Choice”, vol. 81(3–4), pp. 381–401.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053239
Hulten Ch.R. (1996), Infrastructure Effectiveness as a Determinant of Economic Growth: How Well You Use it May Be More Important than How Much You Have, “NBER Working Paper”, no. 5847 (Revised 2005).
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w5847
International Monetary Fund (2004), IMF Article IV Review of Austria, Selected Issues: The Impact of Government Size and the Composition of Revenue and Expenditure on Growth, Washington.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451802344.002
Janeba E. (2000), Trade, Income Inequality, and Government Policies: Redistribution of Income or Education Subsidies?, “NBER Working Paper”, no. 7485.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w7485
Jaumotte F., Pain N. (2005) An Overview of Public Policies To Support Innovation, “OECD Economics Department Working Papers”, no. 456.
Google Scholar
Kaldor N. (1956), Alternative Theories of Distribution, “Review of Economic Studies”, no. 23, pp. 83–100.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296292
Keefer P., Knack S. (1995), Institutions, And Economic Performance: Cross‑Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures, “Economics and Politics”, vol. 7(3), pp. 207–227.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
King R. G., Rebelo S. (1990), Public Policy and Economic Growth: Developing Neoclassical Implications, “Journal of Political Economy”, vol. 98(5), pp. 126–150.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261727
Kneller R., Stevens P. A. (2006), Frontier Technology and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from OECD Manufacturing Industries, “Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 68(1), pp. 1–21.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2006.00150.x
Koester R. B., Kormendi R. C. (1989), Taxation, Aggregate Activity and Economic Growth: Cross‑Country Evidence on Some Supply‑Side Hypotheses, “Economic Inquiry”, vol. 27(3), pp. 367–386.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1989.tb02011.x
Kotsogiannis Ch., Schwager R. (2008), Accountability and Fiscal Equalization, “Journal of Public Economics”, vol. 92(12), pp. 2336–2349.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.013
Landau D. (1996), Is One of The ‘Peace Dividends’ Negative? Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in The Wealthy OECD Countries, “Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance”, vol. 36(2), pp. 183–196.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(96)90038-1
Layard R., Nickell S., Jackman R. (1996), Combating Unemployment: Is Flexibility enough?, ‘Centre For Economic Performance Discussion Paper”, no. 293, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
Google Scholar
Leibfritz W., Thornton J., Bibbee A. (1997), Taxation and Economic Performance, OECD, Paris.
Google Scholar
Leung D., Meh C., Terajima Y. (2008), Firm size and productivity, “Bank of Canada Working Paper”, no. 2008–45.
Google Scholar
Maddison‑Project, http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/home.htm [accessed: 3.05.2021].
Google Scholar
Mares I. (2007), The Economic Consequences of the Welfare State, “International Social Security Review”, vol. 60(2–3), pp. 65–81.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2007.00269.x
Martinez‑Vazquez J., Vulovic V., Liu Y. (2009), Direct versus Indirect Taxation: Trends, Theory and Economic Significance, “International Studies Program Working Paper”, no. 09–11.
Google Scholar
Melitz M. J., Ottaviano G. I.P. (2008), Market Size, Trade, and Productivity, “Review of Economic Studies”, vol. 75(1), pp. 295–316.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x
Miller N. J., Tsoukis Ch. (2001), On the Optimality of Public Capital for Long‑Run Economic Growth: Evidence from Panel Data, “Applied Economics”, vol. 33(9), pp. 1117–1129.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840010003258
Nelson R. R., Phelps E. S. (1966), Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth, “American Economic Review”, vol. 56(1/2), pp. 69–75.
Google Scholar
North D. C. (1993), The New Institutional Economics and Development, “Economic History 9309002”, University Library of Munich, Munich.
Google Scholar
OECD (2010), Tax Policy Reform and Economic Growth, “OECD Tax Policy Studies”, no. 20.
Google Scholar
OECD (2015), Tax Database. Tax Collection Costs, https://data.oecd.org/inequality/poverty-rate.htm [accessed: 3.05.2021].
Google Scholar
OECD (2017), OECD Economic Survey of Italy, Paris.
Google Scholar
Pagano P., Schivardi F. (2003), Firm Size Distribution and Growth, “Scandinavian Journal of Economics”, vol. 105(2), pp. 255–274.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.t01-1-00008
Pestel N., Sommer E. (2017), Shifting Taxes from Labor to Consumption: More Employment and More Inequality, “Review of Income and Wealth”, vol. 63(3), pp. 542–563.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12232
PwC UK, World Bank Group, (2016), Paying Taxes 2017, London.
Google Scholar
Ramirez A., Ranis G., Stewart F. (2000), Economic Growth and Human Development, “World Development”, vol. 28(2), pp. 197–219.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00131-X
Rodden J. A. (2005), Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616075
Romer D. (2000), Makroekonomia dla zaawansowanych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Rzońca A. (2005), Finanse publiczne a wzrost gospodarki w długim okresie. Analiza przy wykorzystaniu zmodyfikowanego modelu nabywania wiedzy przez praktykę, “Materiały i Studia”, no. 198, pp. 1–39.
Google Scholar
Sala‑i‑Martin X. (1997), I Just Ran Two Million Regressions, “American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings”, vol. 87(2), pp. 178–183.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w6252
Showalter M. H., Thurston N. K. (1997), Taxes And Labour Supply of High Income Physicians, “Journal of Public Economics”, vol. 66(1), pp. 73–97.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00021-2
Skrok E. (2013), Podatki a wzrost gospodarczy: wnioski dla Polski wynikające z teorii i doświadczeń międzynarodowych, Warszawa (mimeo).
Google Scholar
Slemrod J., Yitzhaki S. (2002), Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration, [in:] A. J. Auerbach, M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam–London–New York, pp. 1425–1470.
Google Scholar
Smith A. (1954), Badania nad naturą i przyczynami bogactwa narodów, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Smith D. B. (2006), Living with Leviathan: Public Spending, “Taxes and Economic Performance. IEA Hobart Paper”, no. 158.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946392
Smith D. B. (2016), Spending, Tax and Economic Welfare, [in:] P. Booth (ed.), Taxation, government spending and economic growth, Institute of Economic Affairs, London, pp. 87–99.
Google Scholar
Spengel Ch., Elschner Ch., Endres D. (2012), Effective Tax Levels Using the Devereux/Griffith Methodology, Project for the EU Commission, TAXUD/2008/CC/099.
Google Scholar
Stiglitz J. E. (2004), Ekonomia sektora publicznego, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Tanzi V. (2008), Regulating for the New Economic Order: “The Good, The Bad, and The Damaging, Politeia, London.
Google Scholar
Tanzi V., Schuknecht L. (2000), Public Spending in the 20th Century. A Global Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625800
Thomas A., Picos‑Sánchez F. (2012), Shifting from Social Security Contributions to Consumption Taxes: The Impact on Low‑Income Earner Work Incentives, “OECD Taxation Working Paper”, no. 11.
Google Scholar
Van Biesebroeck J. (2005), Firm Size Matters: Growth and Productivity Growth in African Manufacturing, “Economic Development and Cultural Change”, vol. 53(3), pp. 545–583.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/426407
Widmalm F. (2001), Tax Structure And Growth: Are Some Taxes Better Than Others?, “Public Choice”, vol. 107(3), pp. 199–219.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010340017288
World Economic Forum (2016), The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017, Geneva.
Google Scholar