Creative Destruction and Regional Productivity: Evidence from the Polish Regions in 2004–2015

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.341.12

Keywords:

creative destruction, resource reallocation, labour productivity, regional analysis

Abstract

A considerable and persisting diversity of the development levels of Polish regions makes it necessary to seek potential causes of this phenomenon. It can be presumed that some of the diversity is caused by institutional qualities, characteristic for each individual region, including the dynamics of the reallocation of resources available in a particular region, which can be identified with the creative destruction processes, indicated by J. A. Schumpeter. In the view of these facts, this study aims at identifying the mechanisms of creative destruction processes and assessing their influence on the levels of regional productivity of labour in Poland, in the 2004–2015 time period. The conducted analyses showed that the correlation between the measures of creative destruction and the labour productivity is ambiguous and limited, as it was confirmed for only a part of Polish regions. For the remaining part, contrary to the theoretical assumptions, a reverse relationship was observed, i.e. it is the dynamics of productivity that affects the level of reallocation of resources, identified with the processes of creative destruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghion P., Bessonova E. (2006), On entry and growth: Theory and evidence, Revue de l’OFCE, Paris, pp. 259–278.
Google Scholar

Audretsch D. B., Fritsch M. (2002), Growth regimes over time and space, “Regional Studies”, no. 36, pp. 113–124.
Google Scholar

Bartelsman E. J., Doms M. (2000), Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata, “Journal of Economic Literature”, no. 38, pp. 569–594.
Google Scholar

Bartelsman E. J., Haltiwanger J., Scarpetta S. (2013), Cross‑Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection, “American Economic Review”, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 305–334.
Google Scholar

Bosma N,. Stam E., Schutjens V. (2009), Creative Destruction and Regional Productivity Growth: Evidence from the Dutch Manufacturing and Services Industries, “Jena Economic Research Papers”, 2009–003, pp. 1–36.
Google Scholar

Bosma N., Stam E., Schutjens V. (2011), Entrepreneurial Dynamics and Regional Growth, “Small Business Economics”, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 401–418.
Google Scholar

Braunerhjelm P., Borgman B. (2004), Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: Evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975–99, “Regional Studies”, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 929–994, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280947.
Google Scholar

Cahuc P., Zylberberg A. (2006), The Natural Survival of Work. Job Creation and Job Destruction in a Growing Economy, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Camagni R. (2002), On the concept of territorial competitiveness: Sound or misleading?, “Urban Studies”, vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 2395–2411.
Google Scholar

Castells M., Hall P. (1994), Technopoles of the world: The making of 21st century industrial complexes, Routledge, London.
Google Scholar

Dejardin M. (2011), Linking net entry to regional economic growth, “Small Business Economics”, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 443–460.
Google Scholar

Freeman R. (2008), Labour productivity indicators, OECD Statistics Directorate, France, pp. 1–76, http://www.oecd.org/std/labour‑stats/41354425.pdf [accessed: 31.05.2018].
Google Scholar

Granger C. W.J. (1969), Investigating casual relations by econometric models and cross‑spectral models, “Econometrica”, no. 37, pp. 424–438.
Google Scholar

Jarmołowicz W., Kuźmar S. (2016), Poziom i dynamika wydajności pracy oraz jej zróżnicowanie w regionach Unii Europejskiej w latach 2000–2011, “Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego”, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 11–23.
Google Scholar

Johnson P., Parker S. (1996), Spatial variations in the determinants and effects of firm births and deaths, “Regional Studies”, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 679–689.
Google Scholar

Osińska M. (2008), Ekonometryczna analiza zależności przyczynowych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Toruń.
Google Scholar

Schumpeter J. A. (1942), Capitalism, socialism and democracy, Harper and Row, New York.
Google Scholar

Schutjens V., Stam E. (2003), The evolution and nature of young firm networks: A longitudinal perspective, “Small Business Economics”, no. 21, pp. 115–134.
Google Scholar

Storper M. (1997), The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy, Guilford Press, New York.
Google Scholar

Zhou Y., He C., Zhu S. (2017), Does Creative Destruction Work for Chinese Regions?, “Growth and Change”, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 274–296, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/grow.12168.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2019-07-05

How to Cite

Kuźmar, S. (2019). Creative Destruction and Regional Productivity: Evidence from the Polish Regions in 2004–2015. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 2(341), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.341.12

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.