THE APPLICATION OF BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE TO ENHANCE VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT SAVINGS – ARE THE SOLUTIONS UNIVERSAL AROUND THE WORLD?

Authors

  • WOJCIECH Sieczkowski WARSAW SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.11

Keywords:

behavioural finance, voluntary retirement savings, pension systems, multi-pillar pension systems

Abstract

Behavioural finance is a promising solution to enhance voluntary retirement savings (VRS) and is gaining recognition around the world. Despite this, there may be some limitations to the transferability of its applications. This paper summarizes the key findings relevant to long-term savings and then analyses these aforementioned limitations, by first pointing to some methodological assumptions made, and then looking at the potential set of variables impacting the applications’ transferability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alessie Rob J. M., van Rooij Maarten C. J., and Annamaria Lusardi, 2011, Financial Literacy, Retirement Preparation and Pension Expectations in the Netherlands, Working Paper No. 289, De Nederlandsche Bank NV: Amsterdam.
Google Scholar

Antolin P., 2008, Coverage of Funded Pension Plans, OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions No. 19, OECD publishing, © OECD. doi:10.1787/241142156207.
Google Scholar

Antolin P., Payet S., Yermo J., 2012, Coverage of Private Pension Systems: Evidence and Policy Options, OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions No. 20, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k94d6gh2w6c-en.
Google Scholar

Antolín P., Whitehouse E. R., 2009, Filling the Pension Gap: Coverage and Value of Voluntary Retirement Savings, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 69, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/227200770711.
Google Scholar

Arkinstall V., 2008, Kiwisaver. NZ case study: choice and competition, In: International Federation of Pension Fund Administrators, (FIAP), 2008, Pensions for the future: Developing individually funded programs, Lima, Peru.
Google Scholar

Baddeley M., 2013, Behavioural Economics and Finance, Routledge, New York and London.
Google Scholar

Barr N., Diamond P., 2008, Reforming pensions: Principles and policy choices, New York and Oxford: OUP.
Google Scholar

Bańbuła P., 2006, Oszczędności i wybór międzyokresowy – podejście behawioralne, Materiały i Studia, Zeszyt 208, Narodowy Bank Polski, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Benartzi S., Thaler Richard, 2013, Behavioral Economics and the Retirement Savings Crisis, Science Magazine 339, March 8.
Google Scholar

Benartzi S., Thaler R., 2007, Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior, Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3).
Google Scholar

Bernartzi S., Thaler R., 2004, Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics in Increase Employee Saving, Journal of Political Economy 112(1).
Google Scholar

Beshears John James J. Choi, Laibson David, Madrian Brigitte C., 2006a, The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Savings Outcomes: Evidence from the United States, NBER Working Paper No. 12009, January 2006, Revised March 2007,
Google Scholar

http://www.nber.org/papers/w12009.pdf.
Google Scholar

Beshears John James J. Choi, Laibson David, Madrian Brigitte C., 2006b, Simplification and saving, NBER Working Paper No. 12659, http://www.nber.org/papers/w12659.pdf.
Google Scholar

Beshears John James J. Choi, Laibson David, Madrian Brigitte C., Weller Brian, 2008, Public Policy and Saving for Retirement: The Autosave Features of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2008/2008_265.pdf.
Google Scholar

Blaich R., 2010, Occupational pensions in Germany Time for Action Aegon International http://www.aegonglobalpensions.com/Documents/aegon-global-pensions-com/Publications/ Research-papers/White-paper-Occupational-pensions-in-Germany-English.pdf.
Google Scholar

Blake D., 2006, Pension Economics, Wiley, Chichester.
Google Scholar

Börsch-Supan A., 2004, Mind the GAP: The Effectiveness of Incentives to Boost Retirement Saving in Europe, OECD Economic Studies No. 39, 2004/2, 111–144.
Google Scholar

Brunhart N., 2008, Individual Financial Planning for Retirement: Empirical Insights from the Affluent Segment in Germany, Contributions to Economics Psychica – Verlag (Springer), Heidelberg.
Google Scholar

Camerer C. F., Loewenstein G., Rabin M., 2004, Advances in Behavioural Economics, Russel Sage Foundation, NY Princetown University Press Princeton and Oxford.
Google Scholar

Chybalski F., 2009, Barriers to Increased Effectiveness of Investment by Pension Funds in Poland, Discussion Paper PI 0910, Pensions Institute,
Google Scholar

http://www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp0910.pdf.
Google Scholar

Chybalski F., 2011, The Choice of Open Pension Fund made by Citizens of Poland in the Years 2003-2009: The Analysis of the Criteria, Discussion paper PI 1102, Pensions Institute http://www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp1102.pdf.
Google Scholar

Cousins M., 2005, European Welfare States. Comparative perspectives, Sage: London.
Google Scholar

Crossley T. F., Emmerson C., Leicester C., 2012, Raising Household Saving, Institute For Fiscal Studies, London February.
Google Scholar

Diamond P., Koszegi B., 2003, Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting and Retirement, Journal of Public Economics 87(9–10), 1839–1872.
Google Scholar

Disney R., 2007, Household savings rates and the design of public pension programmes Cross country evidence Centre for finance and credit markets, Working Paper 07/02 Notthingam.
Google Scholar

EIOPA, 2013, Good practices on information provision for DC schemes. Enabling occupational DC scheme members to plan for retirement, BoS 13/010 European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority Frankfurt Germany, https://eiopa.europa.eu/fileadmin/tx_dam/ files/publications/reports/Report_Good_Practices_Info_for_DC_schemes.pdf.
Google Scholar

European Commission (EUC), 2010, Private pension schemes. Their role in adequate and sustainable pensions, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union,
Google Scholar

http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=4853&langId=en.
Google Scholar

EUC, 2007, Pensions Schemes and Projection Models in EU-25 Member States, EFA-DG EUC Number 35.
Google Scholar

EUC, 2012, Pension Adequacy in the European Union. 2010–2050, Report prepared jointly by the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission and the Social Protection Committee. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012 doi:10.2767/77325.
Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen G., 1990, The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Polity Press: Cambridge UK.
Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen G. (ed.), 2002, Why we need a new welfare state, Oxford University Press: New York.
Google Scholar

Evans J., 2003, In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(10), October.
Google Scholar

Frederick S., Loewenstein G., OʼDonoghue T., 2002, Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review, Journal of Economic Literature 40(2) (Jun., 2002), 351–401.
Google Scholar

Góra M., 2003, System emerytalny, Wydawnictwo ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Greenwood J., 2012, Pensions and Wealth in Retirement, 2nd edition, Financial Times Publishing, Pearsons, London.
Google Scholar

Hardcastle R., 2012, How can we incentivise pension saving? A behavioural perspective, DWP Working Paper No. 109, UK.
Google Scholar

Hinz R., 2008, Voluntary retirement savings: Motivations incentives and design, In: International Federation of Pension Fund Administrators, (FIAP), 2008, Pensions for the future: Developing individually funded programs, Lima, Peru.
Google Scholar

Holzmann R., Hinz R. (eds.), 2012, Matching Defined Contribution (MDC) Schemes: A Promising Pension Design to Enhance Coverage and Benefit Level?, Washington DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar

http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSOCIALPROTECTION/EXTPENSIONS/0,,contentMDK:22943207~menuPK:396295~pagePK:64020865~piPK:51164185~theSitePK:396253~isCURL:Y,00.html.
Google Scholar

Iwry J. Mark, John David C., 2009, Pursuing universal retirement security through automatic IRAs. Retirement Security Project Policy Brief No. 2009-3,
Google Scholar

http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/07_automatic_ira_iwry.aspx.
Google Scholar

Kahneman D., Tversky A., 1979, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica 47(2), March.
Google Scholar

Kahneman D., 2012, Thinking, Fast and Slow Penguin Books, London, UK.
Google Scholar

Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H., 1991, Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion and Status Quo Bias, Journal of Economic perspectives 5(1), Winter, 193–206.
Google Scholar

Kahneman D., Tversky, A., 1986, Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions, The Journal of Business 59, S251–S278.
Google Scholar

Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H., 2008, The Endowment Effect: Evidence of Losses Valued More than Gains, Handbook of Experimental Economics Results 1, 939–948.
Google Scholar

Knoll Melissa A. Z., 2010, The Role of Behavioral Economics and Behavioral Decision Making in Americans’ Retirement Savings Decisions, Social Security Bulletin 70, No. 4 US SSA.
Google Scholar

Loewenstein G., Thaler R. H., 1989, Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4), 181–93,
Google Scholar

http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/richard.thaler/research/pdf/intertemporal%20choice.pdf.
Google Scholar

Lunn P., 2012, Behavioural Economics and Policymaking Learning from the Early Adopters, Economic and Social Review 43(3), Autumn, 423–449,
Google Scholar

http://www.esri.ie/UserFiles/publications/WP425/WP425.pdf.
Google Scholar

Madrian B. C., 2012, Matching Contributions and Savings Outcomes A Behavioral Economics Perspective, National Bureau of Economic Research NBER Working Paper w18220, July, Cambridge MA USA.
Google Scholar

Madrian B. C., Shea D. F., 2001, The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, Issue 4, 1149–1187.
Google Scholar

Mikulec A., 2012, Porównanie prywatnie zarządzanych planów emerytalnych – ujęcie OECD, Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe, W-Wa PIU.
Google Scholar

Mitchell O. S., Utkus S. P., 2004, Pension Design and Structure. New Lessons From Behavioral Finance, Oxford University Press, New York.
Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2012, OECD Pensions Outlook 2012, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264169401-en.
Google Scholar

OECD, 2011, Pensions at a Glance 2011: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/pension_glance-2011-en.
Google Scholar

OECD, 2008, Complementary pensions throughout the world. OECD/ISSA/IOPS,
Google Scholar

http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/complementary-and-private-pensions-throughout-the-world-2008_9789264048829-en
Google Scholar

OECD, 2007, Policy Brief: Closing the pensions gap: the role of private pensions,
Google Scholar

http://www.oecd.org/insurance/public-pensions/39524851.pdf.
Google Scholar

Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń PIU, 2010, Konferencja III filar – recepta na wyższą emeryturę, Dokumentacja Konferencji, Warszawa, Maj,
Google Scholar

http://www.piu.org.pl/public/upload/ibrowser/Emerytalne-1n.pdf.
Google Scholar

Pieńkowska-Kamieniecka S., Ostrowska-Dankiewicz A., 2013, Dopłaty do dobrowolnych oszczędności emerytalnych – ocena skuteczności rozwiązań na przykładzie Niemiec i Nowej Zelandii, Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe 3, PIU, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Save More Tomorrow Act 2012,
Google Scholar

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3175#summary/libraryofcongress.
Google Scholar

Shefrin H. M., Thaler R. H., 1988, The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis, Economic Inquiry 26(4), 609–643.
Google Scholar

Shefrin H. M., Thaler R. H., 1981, An Economic Theory of Self-Control, Journal of Political Economy 89(2), April, University of Chicago Press, 392–406.
Google Scholar

Sieczkowski W., 2014, Reforma systemu emerytalnego w Wielkiej Brytanii, Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe 2, PIU, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Szumlicz T., 2005, Ubezpieczenie społeczne. Teoria dla praktyki, Oficyna Wydawnicza Branta, Bydgoszcz.
Google Scholar

Stanko D., 2010, Transfery czlonków kapitalowych funduszy emerytalnych na swiecie i w Polsce. Analiza racjonalnosci decyzji czlonków OFE [Transfers of funded pension funds’ members in the world and Poland. An analysis of rationality of choices of OFEs’ members], Rozprawy Ubezpieczeniowe 8(1), 7–36.
Google Scholar

Tapia W., Yermo J., 2007, Implications of Behavioural Economics for Mandatory Individual Account Pension Systems, OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions No. 11, OECD Publishing, doi:10.1787/103002825851.
Google Scholar

Thaler R. H., 1999, Mental Accounting Matters, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12(3), 183–206.
Google Scholar

Thaler R. H., 2000, Quasi Rational Economics, New York Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar

Thaler R. H., 1990, Anomalies: Saving, Fungibility and Mental Accounts, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(1), Winter, 193–205.
Google Scholar

Thaler R. H., 1981, Some Emprirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency, Economic Letters 8, 201–207.
Google Scholar

Turner J., 1997, Retirement income systems for different economic, demographic and political environments, OECD Working Paper Ageing Working Papers 3.8, OECD: .
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2015-11-27

How to Cite

Sieczkowski, W. (2015). THE APPLICATION OF BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE TO ENHANCE VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT SAVINGS – ARE THE SOLUTIONS UNIVERSAL AROUND THE WORLD?. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 1(310). https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.11

Issue

Section

Neoclasical and behavioral finannce