INCOME DISTRIBUTION MODELS AND INCOME INEQUALITY MEASURES FROM THE ROBUST STATISTICS PERSPECTIVE REVISITED
Keywords:
Income distribution, income inequality, robust estimation.Abstract
Considerations related to income distribution and income inequalities in populations of economic agents belong to the core of the modern economic theory. They appear also in a public debate concerning postulates as to taxation or pension politics, in theories of a human capital creation or searching for regional development factors.
Results of statistical inference conducted for giving arguments pro or against particular hypotheses, strongly depend on properties of statistical procedures used within this process. We mean here for example: a quality of probability density estimator in case of missing data, a quality of skewness measure in multivariate case departing from normality, or a quality of dimension reduction algorithm in case of existence of outliers.
In this paper from the robust statistics point of view, we analyse difficulties related to statistical inference on income distribution models and income inequalities measures. Theoretical considerations are illustrated using real data obtained from Eurostat and Minessota Population Center (IMPUS).
Downloads
References
Brazauskas V., Serfling R. (2000), Robust and Efficient Estimation of the Tail Index of a Single-Parameter Pareto Distribution, “North American Actuarial Journal”, 4, pp. 12-27.
Google Scholar
Brazauskas V., Serfling R. (2001), Robust Estimation of Tail Parameters for Two-Parameter Pareto and Exponential Models via Generalized Quantile Statistics, “Extremes”, 3,
Google Scholar
pp. 231-249.
Google Scholar
Brazauskas V., Serfling R. (2004), Favorable Estimators for Fitting Pareto Models: A Study Using Goodness-of-Fit Measures with Actual Data, ASTIN Bulletin, 2, pp. 365-381.
Google Scholar
Dagum C. (2001), A systemic approach to the generation of income distribution models, (in:) Sattinger M. (ed.), Income Distribution, vol. I, E. Elgar, Northampton, pp. 32-53.
Google Scholar
Hyndman J. R., Yao Q. (2002), Nonparametric estimation and symmetry tests for conditional density functions, “Journal of Nonparametric Statistics”, 14 (3), pp. 259 278.
Google Scholar
Kalecki M. (1945), On the Gibrat distribution, “Econometrica”, 13, pp. 161-170.
Google Scholar
Kleiber C., Kotz S. (2002), A characterization of income distributions in terms of generalized Gini coefficients, “Social Choice and Welfare”, 19, pp. 789-794.
Google Scholar
Kleiber C., Kotz S. (2003), Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences, Wiley, New Jersey.
Google Scholar
Kosiorowski D., Zawadzki Z. (2014). DepthProc: An R package for robust exploration of multidimensional economic phenomena. Submitted.
Google Scholar
Kosiorowski D., Tracz, D. (2014a), On robust estimation of Pareto models and its consequences for government aid programs evaluation, (in:) Lula P., Rojek T. (eds.), Knowledge-Economy-Society Contemporary Tools of Organizational Management, pp. 253-267.
Google Scholar
Kosiorowski D., Mielczarek D., Rydlewski J., Snarska M. (2014), Applications of the functional data analysis for extracting meaningful information from families of yield curves and income distribution densities, (in:) Lula P., Rojek T. (eds.), Knowledge-Economy-Society Contemporary Tools of Organizational Management, pp. 309-321.
Google Scholar
Maronna R. A., Martin R. D., Yohai V. J. (2006), Robust Statistics – Theory and Methods, Wiley, Chichester.
Google Scholar
Mosler K. (2013), Depth statistics, (in:) Becker C., Fried R. S. K. (eds.), Robustness and Complex Data Structures, Festschrift in Honour of Ursula Gather. Springer, pp. 17-34.
Google Scholar
Pawlak W., Sztaudynger J. J. (2008), Wzrost gospodarczy a optymalne zróżnicowanie dochodów w USA i Szwecji, “Annales – Etyka w życiu gospodarczym”, 1, pp. 259-271
Google Scholar
Serfling R. (2002), Efficient and Robust Fitting of Lognormal Distributions.
Google Scholar
Victoria-Feser M. P. (2000), Robust Methods for the Analysis of Income Distribution, Inequality and Poverty, “International Statistical Review”, 68, pp. 277-293.
Google Scholar
