Wpływ cykli koniunkturalnych na działalność innowacyjną przedsiębiorstw w krajach Unii Europejskiej

Arkadiusz Kijek

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.336.14

Authors

Arkadiusz Kijek Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej, Wydział Ekonomiczny, Zakład Statystyki i Ekonometrii

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.336.14

Keywords:

business cycle, innovation activity, R&D

Abstract

Multidimensional connections between innovative activity of enterprises and business cycle phases result in the ambiguous nature of this relationship. The main aim of the article is to analyze the impact of business cycle phases on inputs and outputs of innovative activity of enterprises. The innovative performance of companies was examined during periods of recession and recovery in the EU countries and in Norway in the years 2002–2014. Empirical verification of theoretical assumptions confirmed the complex nature of the relationship between the innovative activity of enterprises and business cycles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghion P., Askenazy P., Berman N., Cette G., Eymard L. (2012), Credit Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France, „Journal of the European Economic Association”,t. 10, s. 1001–1024.
Google Scholar

Archibugi D., Filippetti A., Frenz M. (2013), Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?, „Research Policy”, t. 42, nr 2, s. 303–314.
Google Scholar

Barlevy G. (2007), On the Cyclicality of Research and Development, „American Economic Review”, t. 97, s. 1131–1164.
Google Scholar

Bovha‑Padilla S., Damijan J.P., Konings J. (2009), Financial Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D investment: Evidence from Slovenia, LICOS Discussion Paper 239/2009.
Google Scholar

Cincera M., Cozza C., Tübke A., Voigt P. (2012), Doing R&D or Not (in a Crisis), That Is the Question, „European Planning Studies”, t. 20, s. 1525–1547.
Google Scholar

Cohen W.M. (2010), Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance, [w:] B.A. Hall, N. Rosenberg (eds.), Handbook of Economics of Innovation, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar

Francois P., Lloyd‑Ellis H. (2003), Animal Spirits Through Creative Destruction, „American Economic Review”, t. 93, s. 530–550.
Google Scholar

Himmelberg C.P., Petersen B.C. (1994), R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High‑Tech Industries, „Review of Economics and Statistics”, t. 76, nr 1, s. 38–51.
Google Scholar

Judd K.L. (1985), On the Performance of Patents, „Econometrica”, t. 53, nr 3, s. 567–585.
Google Scholar

Kydland F.E., Prescott E.C. (1990), Business Cycles: Real Facts and a Monetary Myth, „Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review”, t. 14, nr 2, s. 3–18.
Google Scholar

Laursen K., Salter A. (2006), Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms, „Strategic Management Journal”, t. 27, nr 2, s. 131–150.
Google Scholar

OECD (2005), Oslo manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data.
Google Scholar

Peters B., Dachs B., Dünser M., Hud M., Köhler C., Rammer C. (2014), Firm Growth, Innovation and the Business Cycle. Background Report for the 2014 Competitiveness Report, ZEW,Mannheim.
Google Scholar

Rammer C. (2012), Schwerpunktbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2010, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim.
Google Scholar

Schumpeter J.A. (1911), Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 8th ed, Dunckner & Humbolt, Berlin.
Google Scholar

Schumpeter J.A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, McGraw‑Hill Book Company, New York–Toronto–London.
Google Scholar

Stiglitz J. (1993), Endogenous Growth and Cycles, NBER Working Paper, nr 4286.
Google Scholar