Metody wartościowania projektów nowego produktu w procesie zarządzania portfelowego w prerynkowych fazach cyklu życia produktu

Ireneusz Rutkowski

doi:10.18778/0208-6018.366.04

Authors

Ireneusz Rutkowski Poznań University of Economics and Business, Institute of Management, Department of Investment and Real Estate, Poznań, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3821-3533

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.366.04

Keywords:

new product management, portfolio methods, portfolio management, new products, new product development process

Abstract

The goal of the paper is to present methods for evaluating new product designs or projects in an integrated new product development process, as well as to propose a new method for optimising the value of new product portfolio management (NPPM) in the pre market phases of product life cycle. The success level of a new product development strategy is significantly dependent on the degree of a company’s competence, firstly in the implementation of the new product development process (NPDP), and secondly in the proper evaluation and selection of new product design concepts (executing the right project). In particular, the latter area of competence is related to the issues of portfolio management in the field of new product development. Thus, we are dealing here with a dynamic decision making process – the Stage Gate Process, according to which the design team is constantly updating, implementing and revising the current set of new product designs. Strategic decisions are also made on the allocation or reallocation of resources between active projects and whether to accelerate their implementation, change the assigned priority or abandon the project. This is a conceptual and methodological paper based on strategic management concepts and applications. It relates to new product development research. Methodological and research limitations identified in this work result from such circumstances as time and financial constraints or information availability. The scientific result of the article is a modified rank resource method of evaluating projects/programmes in the NPDP funnel (a portfolio of projects at individual stages and gates of development process), containing both qualitative and quantitative criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansoff H.I. (1964), Evaluation of Applied R&D in a Firm, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Brzozowski M. (2014), Metody zarządzania portfelem projektów, “Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia”, nr 11(272), pp. 9–24.
Google Scholar

Cabała P. (2018), Analiza efektywności portfela projektów, “Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej”, no. 77, pp. 17–29.
Google Scholar

Chagas Brasil V., Eggers, J.P. (2019), Product and Innovation Portfolio Management, [in:] Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.28 [accessed: 25.09.2023].
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G. (1994), Perspective third-generation new product processes, “Journal of Product Innovation Management”, nr 11(1), pp. 3–14.
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G. (2014), What’s Next?: After Stage-Gate, “Research-Technology Management”, vol. 57(1), pp. 20–31.
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G. (2017), Winning at New Products. Creating Value through Innovation, Basic Books, New York.
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J. (2009), Product Innovation and Technology Strategy, Product Development Institute, Booksurge Publishing, Charleston.
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2010), Stage-Gate Process for New Product Success, Innovation Management U3, Denmark.
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (1999), New product portfolio management: practices and performance, “Journal of Product Innovation Management”, vol. 16(4), pp. 333–351.
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2000), New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective, “Research Technology Management”, vol. 45(6), pp. 43–49.
Google Scholar

Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmdt E.J. (2001), Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study, “R&D Management Journal”, vol. 31(4), pp. 361–380.
Google Scholar

Crawford M., Di Benedetto A. (2011), New Products Management, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York.
Google Scholar

Crow K. (2015), Benchmarking best practices to improve product development, DRM Associates, USA.
Google Scholar

Dąbrowski D. (2022), Szacowanie przewagi konkurencyjnej w procesie rozwoju nowego produktu – ujęcie praktyczne, [in:] P. Cabała, J. Walas-Trębacz, T. Małkus (eds.), Zarządzanie organizacjami w społeczeństwie informacyjnym. Strategie – projekty – procesy, Wydawnictwo TNOIK, Toruń, pp. 67–78.
Google Scholar

De Meyer A., Loch C.H., Pich M.T. (2002), Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos, “MIT Sloan Management Review”, vol. 43(2), pp. 60–67.
Google Scholar

De Reyck B., Grushka-Cockayne Y., Lockett M., Calderini S.R., Moura M., Sloper A. (2005), The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects, “International Journal of Project Management”, vol. 23(7), pp. 524–537, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6748 [accessed: 25.09.2023].
Google Scholar

Edgett S.J. (2014), Innovation: A Critical Capability, “The European Business Review”, January – February, pp. 28–30.
Google Scholar

Gierszewska G., Romanowska M. (2017), Analiza strategiczna przedsiębiorstwa, PWE, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Hofman M., Spalek S., Grela G. (2017), Shedding New Light on Project Portfolio Risk Management, “Sustainability”, vol. 9(10), 1798.
Google Scholar

Kettunen J., Gruksha-Cockayne Y., Degraeve Z., De Reyck B. (2015), New product development flexibility in a competitive environment, “European Journal of Operational Research”, vol. 244(3), pp. 892–904, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6760 [accessed: 25.09.2023].
Google Scholar

Kharat V.J., Bhukya K.R.N. (2018), Best Practices in Project Portfolio Management for Dynamic Decision Making, “The Journal of Modern Project Management”, vol. 6(1), https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=2Ua0UhcAAAAJ&citation_for_view=2Ua0UhcAAAAJ:u-x6o8ySG0sC [accessed: 25.09.2023].
Google Scholar

Killen C.P., Hunt R.A., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2008), Project Portfolio Management for Product Innovation, “International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management”, vol. 25(1), pp. 24–38.
Google Scholar

Lahtinen N., Mustonen E., Harkonen J. (2021), Commercial and Technical Productization for Fact-Based Product Portfolio Management Over Lifecycle, “IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management”, vol. 68(6), pp. 1826–1838, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2932974
Google Scholar

Lambin J.-J. (2001), Strategiczne zarządzanie marketingowe, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Loch C. (2000), Tailoring product development to strategy: Case of a European technology manufacturer, “European Management Journal”, no. 18, pp. 246–258.
Google Scholar

Matheson D., Menke M.M. (1994), Making excellent R&D decisions, “Research Technology Management”, November–December, pp. 21–24.
Google Scholar

McNally R.C., Durmusoglu S.S., Calantone R.J., Harmancioglu N. (2009), Exploring new product portfolio management decisions: The role of managers’ dispositional traits, “Industrial Marketing Management”, vol. 38(1), pp. 127–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.09.006
Google Scholar

Meskendahl S. (2010), The Influence of Business Strategy on Project Portfolio Management and its Success – A Conceptual Framework, “International Journal of Project Management”, vol. 28(8), pp. 807–817.
Google Scholar

Mikkola J.H. (2001), Portfolio Management of R&D Projects: Implications for Innovation Management, “Technovation”, vol. 21(7), pp. 423–435.
Google Scholar

Montoya-Weiss M.M., Calantone R. (1994), Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis, “The Journal of Product Innovation Management”, vol. 11(5), pp. 397–417, https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(94)90029-9
Google Scholar

Nakata C., Di Benedetto C.A. (2012), Forward to the Future: The New Knowledge Needed to Advance NPD – Innovation Theory and Practice, “Journal of Product Innovation Management”, vol. 29(3), pp. 341–343.
Google Scholar

Olsen F. (1955), The Control of Research Funds, Coordinating, Control and Financing of Industrial Research, Kings Crown Press, Columbia University, New York.
Google Scholar

Rutkowski I.P. (2013), Zmodyfikowane metody analizy portfelowej i ich zastosowanie do oceny projektów innowacji produktowych, “Nauki o Zarządzaniu / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu”, no. 4(17), pp. 109–122.
Google Scholar

Rutkowski I.P. (2016), Metody innowacji produktu: macierzowo-sieciowe metody pomiaru dojrzałości procesu innowacji produktu, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Rybicki J.M. (2000), Wielowymiarowy model analizy portfelowej jako narzędzie formułowania strategii rynkowej przedsiębiorstwa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.
Google Scholar

Stabryła A. (2015), Zarządzanie projektami ekonomicznymi i organizacyjnymi, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Stark J. (2018), Product Lifecycle Management (vol. 3): The Executive Summary, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72236-8
Google Scholar

Stevens S.S. (1946), On the theory of scales of measurement, “Science”, no. 103, pp. 677–680.
Google Scholar

Trott P. (2011), Innovation Management and New Product Development, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Harlow.
Google Scholar

Urban G.L., Hauser J.R. (2005), Design and Marketing of New Products, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Google Scholar