Supernatural Beings and Their Appropriation of Knowledge and Power in The Seafarer by Conor McPherson and Woman and Scarecrow by Marina Carr

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2353-6098.6.05

Keywords:

Carr, Marina, McPherson, Conor, supernatural, knowledge, manipulation, appropriation, The Seafarer, Woman and Scarecrow

Abstract

This article is a comparative analysis of Woman and Scarecrow by Marina Carr and The Seafarer by Conor McPherson from a hauntological perspective. It aims at discussing the influence of supernatural beings on mortal protagonists as well as addressing the configurations of power and knowledge formed between the characters. Woman and Scarecrow follows the final moments of a dying woman accompanied by the mysterious figure of Scarecrow, who is hidden from other characters. The verbal exchanges between Scarecrow and Woman will be interpreted as a manifestation of the apparent power possessed by the former, the ambiguous supernatural figure, over the latter, a human being, in terms of appropriating the knowledge about the woman’s past. In McPherson’s The Seafarer, a mysterious relationship develops between Sharky and Mr. Lockhart, who knows about Sharky’s past, too. This paper will demonstrate both similarities and differences in the way in which Carr and McPherson make use of supernatural beings that manipulate human characters in the most crucial moments of their lives and will situate the two plays within the recent rise of interest in spectrality in Irish drama.

Author Biography

Grzegorz Koneczniak, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland

Grzegorz Koneczniak is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anglophone Literature, Culture and Comparative Studies at Faculty of Humanities, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland, where he teaches courses in editorial and textual aspects of literary works. His research interests include postcolonial literatures, postcolonial theatre (Canadian and Irish), Anglo-Irish literature, literary theory, and comparative studies. He is the author of Women on Stage and the Decolonisation of Ireland. Counter-Discursiveness in the Drama of the Irish Literary Revival (1892–1926) and a book in Polish on the history of Canadian drama and theatre. He has also written Prompting In/Ex/Tensions inside the Manuscript and the Digital Folio: An Exploration of Selected Early Abbey Theatre Production Books, a book on selected aspects of digital publishing and textual scholarship.

References

Carr, Marina. 2009. Woman and Scarecrow. Plays 2. London: Faber & Faber.
Google Scholar

Davis, Colin. 2005. “État Présent: Hauntology, Spectres and Phantoms.” French Studies, Vol. LIX, No. 3, 373–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/kni143
Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. Transl. Peggy Kamuf. New York and London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Gordon, David. 2018. “Death Becomes Her in Woman and Scarecrow.” TheaterMania, 20 May 2018. https://www.theatermania.com/off-broadway/reviews/review-woman-and-scarecrow_85271.html DOA: 4.03.2021.
Google Scholar

Hill, Shonagh. 2019. Women and Embodied Mythmaking in Irish Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108756327
Google Scholar

Jordan, Eamonn. 2019. The Theatre and Films of Conor McPherson: Conspicuous Communities. London and New York: Methuen Drama, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Google Scholar

Lonergan, Patrick. 2011. “Irish Theatre and Globalisation: A Faustian Pact?” In: Eamon Maher (ed.). Cultural Perspectives on Globalisation and Ireland. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 177–90.
Google Scholar

Lorek-Jezińska, Edyta. 2013. Hauntology and Intertextuality in Contemporary British Drama by Women Playwrights. Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press.
Google Scholar

McPherson, Conor. 2007. The Seafarer. New York: Theatre Communications Group. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781784600341.00000004
Google Scholar

Miller, Deb. 2018. Review: ‘Woman and Scarecrow’ at Irish Repertory Theatre. DC Metro, 20 May. https://dcmetrotheaterarts.com/2018/05/20/review-woman-and-scarecrow-at-irish-repertory-theatre/ DOA: 18.03.2021.
Google Scholar

Morash, Christopher. 2004. A History of Irish Theatre, 1601–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Morash, Christopher and Shaun Richards. 2013. Mapping Irish Theatre: Theories of Space and Place. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600309
Google Scholar

Murray, Christopher. 2000. Twentieth-Century Irish Drama: Mirror up to Nation. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Google Scholar

Sihra, Melissa. 2018. Marina Carr: Pastures of the Unknown. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98331-8
Google Scholar

Singleton, Brian. 2004. “The Revival Revisited.” In: Shaun Richards (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Twentieth-Century Irish Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521804000.019
Google Scholar

Trench, Rhona. 2010. Bloody Living: The Loss of Selfhood in the Plays of Marina Carr. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Watt, Stephen. 2000. “Love and Death: A Reconsideration of Behan and Genet.” In: Stephen Watt, Eileen Morgan, Shakir Mustafa (eds). A Century of Irish Drama: Widening the Stage. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 130–45.
Google Scholar

White, Eva Roa. 2018. “Whose Dublin Is It Anyway? Joyce, Doyle and the City.” In: Maria Beville and Deirdre Flynn (eds). Irish Urban Fictions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98322-6_2
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Koneczniak, G. (2020). Supernatural Beings and Their Appropriation of Knowledge and Power in The Seafarer by Conor McPherson and Woman and Scarecrow by Marina Carr. Analyses/Rereadings/Theories: A Journal Devoted to Literature, Film and Theatre, 6(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.18778/2353-6098.6.05