A tale of two Eberts: Videogames and the arbitrariness of meaning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.08.03

Keywords:

Roger Ebert, games criticism, art, intention, meaning, Modernism

Abstract

The article revisits and examines in detail the so-called Ebert debate: an exchange of polemic voices between Roger Ebert, his opponents and supporters, on the issue of the relationship – both actual and potential – between games and works of art. Initiated by Ebert’s famous remarks that games can never be art, the debate offers a variety of views on the nature of art, the role of experience in art and games, the possibility of artistic expression in games, and the autonomy of art. The main point of the article is not so much to compare these views as to explain the contradiction at the heart of Ebert’s own argument: the critic seems to be constantly torn between the idea that games cannot be art in principle and the more practical view that it is impossible to know for certain that no games will ever become art. This contradiction seems to stem directly from Ebert’s inconsistent views as to the source of meaning in games, and it allows us to shed new light both on the nature of games as a medium, and on fundamental issues with contemporary games studies/criticism.

Author Biography

Paweł Kaczmarski, University of Wrocław

Paweł Kaczmarski – is a doctoral candidate at the University of Wrocław (Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences). He is a member of the editorial team of Praktyka Teoretyczna / Theoretical Practice, a journal of philosophy, sociology and culture, and a co-editor of 8. Arkusz Odry, a poetry supplement to Odra. Recently, he has published Oporne komunikaty. Strategie znaczenia w poezji współczesnej (Łódź–Kraków 2021). His main interests include contemporary poetry, games criticism, and the politics of art/literature.

References

Ashton, J. (2011). Two Problems with a Neuroaesthetic Theory of Interpretation. Nonsite, issue 2 https://nonsite.org/two-problems-with-a-neuroaesthetic-theory-of-interpretation/ (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Begy, J. (2013). Experiential Metaphors in Abstract Games. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 1(1) http://todigra.org/index.php/todigra/article/view/3 (accessed on January 10, 2018). https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i1.3
Google Scholar

Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive Games. The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge, London: MIT Press https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5334.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5334.001.0001

Bogost, I. (2011). How to Do Things With Videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816676460.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816676460.001.0001

Bourgonjon, J., Vandermeersche, G., Rutten, K., & Quinten, N. (2017). Perspectives on Video Games as Art. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 19(4) https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3024
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3024

Brown, N. (2019). Autonomy: The Social Ontology of Art under Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002673
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478002673

Cavell, S. (1976). Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Chayka, K. (2010, May 5). Why Video Games Are Works of Art. The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2010/05/why-video-games-are-works-of-art/56205/ (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Cronan, T. (2013). Against Affective Formalism: Matisse, Bergson, Modernism. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Duchamp, M. (1975). Salt Seller: The Essential Writings of Marcel Duchamp. Edited by M. Sanouillet & E. Peterson. London: Thames and Hudson.
Google Scholar

Ebert, R. (2005, November 27). Why did the chicken cross the genders? Rogerebert.com https://www.rogerebert.com/answer-man/why-did-the-chicken-cross-thegenders (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Ebert, R. (2007, July 21). Games vs. Art: Ebert vs. Barker. Rogerebert.com https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/games-vs-art-ebert-vs-barker (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Ebert, R. (2010, April 16). Video Games Can Never Be Art. Rogerebert.com https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/video-games-can-never-be-art (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Ebert, R. (2010, July 1). Okay, Kids, Play on My Lawn. Rogerebert.com https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/okay-kids-play-on-my-lawn (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Fried, M. (1967/1998). Art and Objecthood. In M. Fried, Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, J. (2005). Moderate versus Strong Intentionalism: Knapp and Michaels Revisited. San Diego Law Review, 42(2), 669–684.
Google Scholar

Hirsch, E.D. (1992). In Defense of the Author. In G. Iseminger (ed.), Intention & Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar

Knapp, S., & Michaels, W.B. (1982). Against Theory. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 723–742 https://doi.org/10.1086/448178
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448178

Knapp, S., & Michaels, W.B. (1983). A Reply to Our Critics. Critical Inquiry, 9(4), 790–800 https://doi.org/10.1086/448233
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448233

Leys, R. (2017). The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226488738.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226488738.001.0001

Michaels, W.B. (2004). The Shape of the Signifier: 1967 to the End of History. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Michaels, W.B. (2018). Grimstad on Experience, Flatley on Affect: A Response.
Google Scholar

Nonsite, issue 22 https://nonsite.org/grimstad-on-experience-flatley-on-affect/ (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Michaels, W.B. (2019). Blind Time (Drawing with Anscombe). REAL, 35, 49–60.
Google Scholar

Moriarty, B. (2011, March 14). Opinion: Brian Moriarty’s Apology For Roger Ebert. Game Developer https://www.gamedeveloper.com/console/opinion-brian-moriarty-s-apology-for-roger-ebert (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Murray, J.H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck. The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Preston, J. (2008, February 11). The Arty Party. Game Developer https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/the-arty-party (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Romero, B. (2016, February 16). Are Games Art? Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5sBdR4-GGM (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Rough, B. (2017) The Incompatibility of Games and Artworks. Journal of the Philosophy of Games 1(1) https://doi.org/10.5617/jpg.2736
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5617/jpg.2736

Santiago, K. (2009, August 17). An Argument for Game Artistry. Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9y6MYDSAww (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Santiago, K. (2010, April 19). My Response To Roger Ebert, Video Game Skeptic. Kotaku https://kotaku.com/my-response-to-roger-ebert-video-game-skeptic-5520437 (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Sharp, J. (2015). Works of Game. On the Aesthetics of Games and Art. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Smuts, A. (2005). Are Video Games Art? Contemporary Aesthetics, 3(3) https://digitalcommons.risd.edu/liberalarts_contempaesthetics/vol3/iss1/6/ (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Stenros, J. (2017). The Game Definition Game: A Review. Games and Culture, 12(6), 1–22 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412016655679
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016655679

Strunk, T.A. (2017). Alone In A World of Objects: Videogames, Interaction, and Late Capitalist Alienation. Nonsite, issue 22 https://nonsite.org/alone-in-a-world-of-objects/ (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Tavinor, G. (2009). The Art of Videogames. New Directions in Aesthetics. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310177
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310177

Thomsen, M. (2012, June 14). Dad is Dead: Rebutting Roger Ebert. IGN https://www.ign.com/articles/2010/04/20/dad-is-dead-rebutting-roger-ebert (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Treanor, M. (2016). Finding Meaning in Abstract Games: A Deep Reading of Sage Solitaire. In Proceedings of 1st International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG, Dundee, Scotland, 2016. Digital Games Research Association http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/paper_432.pdf (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Treanor, M., Schweizer, B., Bogost, I., & Mateas, M. (2011) Proceduralist Readings: How to Find Meaning in Games with Graphical Logics. In FDG ‘11: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 115–122). ACM Press https://doi.org/10.1145/2159365.2159381
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2159365.2159381

Zimmerman, E. (2014, September 10). Games, Stay Away from Art. Please. Polygon https://www.polygon.com/2014/9/10/6101639/games-art (accessed on June 20, 2022).
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2022-09-13

How to Cite

Kaczmarski, P. (2022). A tale of two Eberts: Videogames and the arbitrariness of meaning. Replay. The Polish Journal of Game Studies, 8(1), 43–72. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.08.03

Issue

Section

Articles