U.S. Foreign Policy Towards North Korea

Authors

  • Lucia Husenicova Matej Bel Universtiy in Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, Faculty of Political Science and International Relations, Department of Security Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.22.05

Keywords:

North Korea, nuclear program, missile program, U.S. foreign policy objectives, non-proliferation regime, sanctions

Abstract

The U.S. relations to Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) are since the end of the Cold War revolving around achieving a state of nuclear free Korean peninsula. As non-proliferation is a long term of American foreign policy, relations to North Korea could be categorized primarily under this umbrella. However, the issue of North Korean political system also plays role as it belongs to the other important, more normative category of U.S. foreign policy which is the protection of human rights and spreading of democracy and liberal values. In addition, the North Korean issue influences U.S. relations and interests in broader region of Northeast Asia, its bilateral alliances with South Korea (Republic of Korea, ROK) and Japan as well as sensitive and complex relations to People’s Republic of China. As the current administration of president Donald J. Trump published its National security strategy and was fully occupied with the situation on Korean peninsula in its first year, the aim of the paper is to analyse the changes in evolution of U.S. North Korean policy under last three administrations, look at the different strategies adopted in order to achieve the same aim, the denuclearization. The paper does not provide a thorough analysis, neither looks at all documents adopted and presented in the U.S. or within the U.N. It more focuses on the general principles of particular strategies, most significant events in mutual relations as recorded by involved gov­ernmental officials and also weaknesses of these strategies as none has achieved desirable result. In conclusion, several options for current administration are drawn, however all of them require significant compromises and could be accompanied with series of setbacks dangerous for regional stability and U.S. position in the region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lucia Husenicova, Matej Bel Universtiy in Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, Faculty of Political Science and International Relations, Department of Security Studies

Lucia Husenicova, Dr., currently works at the Department of Security Studies, Faculty of Political Science and International Relations, Matej Bel Universtiy in Banska Bystrica, Slovakia. She is teaching courses on IR theories, Strategic culture of powers (U.S., Russia and China) and Regional Security with the emphasis on East Asia. She has finished her PhD in 2009 with the topic: North Korea as a Geopolitical Focus.

References

Agreed Framework between the United States of America and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, 1994. Web. http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/infcirc457.pdf
Google Scholar

Albright, Madeleine. The Debate over How to Deal with North Korea. Interview: Frontline. 27, March 2003. Web. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/interviews/albright.html
Google Scholar

Atlas, Terry, and Siegfried, Hecker, Dealing With Russia and North Korea: An Interview With Siegfried Hecker, “Arms Control Today”, vol. 46, no. 9 (2016), pp. 36–38. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24878344
Google Scholar

Bush, George W. Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union. Washington: State Union Adress. Web. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29644
Google Scholar

Bush, George W. Statement on Completion of the North Korea Policy Review. Washington. Web. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=45819
Google Scholar

Carter, Jimmy. The Baffling “Hermit Kingdom.” Interview: Frontline. 21, March 2003. Web. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/interviews/carter.html
Google Scholar

Crail, Peter. US, North Korea hold bilateral talks, “Arms Control Today”, vol. 41, no. 7 (September 2011), pp. 39–40. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23629122.pdf
Google Scholar

DPRK FM on Its Stand to Suspend Its Participation in Six-party Talks for Indefinite Period. Korean Central News Agency, 2005. Web. http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2005/200502/news02/11.htm
Google Scholar

DPRK Foreign Ministry Declares Strong Counter-Measures against UNSC’s “Resolution 1874”. Korean Central News Agency, 2009. Web. http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm
Google Scholar

DPRK – Russia Joint Declaration, 2000. Web. http://www1.korea-np.co.jp/143th_issue/2000072101.htm
Google Scholar

DPRK Successfully Conducts Underground Nuclear Test. Korean Central News Agency, 2006. Web. http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm
Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Mark. Leap Day in North Korea. Foreign Policy Argument. Web. http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/02/29/leap-day-in-north-korea/
Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Mark. Obama’s Prime Nonproliferation Failure, “Arms Control Today”, vol. 46, no. 10 (2016), p. 11. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44155151
Google Scholar

Galluci, Robert L. The Debate over How to Deal with North Korea. Interview: Frontline. 5, March 2003. Web. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/kim/interviews/gallucci.html
Google Scholar

Han, Yong-Sup. North Korea Behavior in Nuclear Negotiation, “The Nonproliferation Review”, vol. 7, no. 1, (2000), pp. 41–54. Web. https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/han71.pdf
Google Scholar

Independent Task Force Report No. 64. U.S. Policy Toward Korean Peninsula (2010). Web. http://cns.miis.edu/inventory/pdfs/koreanuc.pdf
Google Scholar

Kim, Sung Chul and Kang, David. Engagement with North Korea. A Viable alternative. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009
Google Scholar

Klinger, Bruce. Deny, decieve, and delay – North Korea’s nuclear negotiation strategy. “The Journal of East Asian Affairs”, vol. 26, no. 2, Fall/Winter 2012.
Google Scholar

Lee, Chae-Jin. A Troubled Peace. U.S. policy and the two Koreas. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar

Lynch, Column and De Luca, Dan. With U.S. due to Trump’s latest sanktions, “Foreign Policy”, December 13, 2017. Web. http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/13/north-korea-had-spurned-talks-with-u-s-due-to-trumps-latest-sanctions/
Google Scholar

Meyer, Patrik K. U.S. Threat of War on North Korea: Fulfilling‚ Rocket Man‘ Kim Jong Un’s Wishes, “The Diplomat”, September 27, 2017. Web. https://thediplomat.com/2017/09/us-threat-of-war-on-north-korea-fulfilling-rocket-man-kim-jong-uns-wishes/
Google Scholar

Miller, Steven E., Stephen W. Bosworth, and Siegfried S. Hecker. Dealing with North Korea’s Nuclear Program. “Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences”, vol. 65, no. 4 (2012), pp. 12–17. Web. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23359193
Google Scholar

Nikish, Larry. A. Korea: U.S. – South Korea Relations: Issue for Congress, CRS Issue Brief for Congress IB98045. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 2005. Web. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IB98045.pdf
Google Scholar

Non Proliferation Treaty. Web. https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/npt/text
Google Scholar

Opening Statement by Dr. Condoleezza Rice. Senate Foreign Relation Committee, January 18, 2005. Web. http://foreign.senate.gov/testimony/2005/RiceTestimony050118.pdf
Google Scholar

Prichard, Charles. Failed Diplomacy. The tragic story of how North Korea got the bomb. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2007.
Google Scholar

Qiunones, Kenneth. Dualism in the Bush Administration North Korea Policy. “Asian Perspective”, vol. 27, no. 1, 2003.
Google Scholar

Remarks by President Bush and President Kwasniewski. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, January 27, 2004. Web. http://poland.usembassy.gov/poland/bush_kwas_transcr.html
Google Scholar

Tobey, William. Obama’s ‘strategic patience’ on North Korea is turning into strategic neglect. “Foreign Policy”, February 14, 2013. Web. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/02/14/obamas-strategic-patience-on-north-korea-is-turning-into-strategic-neglect/
Google Scholar

Wit, Joel S. and Poneman, Daniel B. and Galluci, Robert L. Geoing Critical. The first North Korean nuclear crisis. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-11-09

How to Cite

Husenicova, L. (2018). U.S. Foreign Policy Towards North Korea. International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal, 22(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.18778/1641-4233.22.05