Exploring Pitch Accent as an Element of Fluency in L2 English Academic Presentations – a Proficiency-based Sampling Report

Agata Klimczak-Pawlak; Ewa Waniek-Klimczak

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.21.1.04

Authors

Agata Klimczak-Pawlak University of Warsaw
Ewa Waniek-Klimczak University of Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.1.04

Keywords:

L2 English prosody, Pitch accent in L2 English, L2 utterance fluency, L2 academic presentation

Abstract

The study explores the effectiveness of raising prosodic awareness in teaching academic presentations to a mixed proficiency group of adult Polish students majoring in English from the perspective of prosody as well as utterance fluency measures. A 15-week course included a 4-week prosody practice with focus on pausing and pitch accent. In the course students produced two speeches of approximately the same length: an impromptu before the practice and a prepared presentation after the practice. The speeches were recorded and analysed for the number of pitch accents and pauses. The data for three students, representing different general L2 proficiency levels are discussed in this paper. The results of prosodic performance operationalized as the pause to pitch accent ratio show the greatest benefit of prosody training in the case of the lowest proficiency level student. The analysis of selected utterance fluency measures shows a positive effect of prosody practice across speakers, providing additional support for the relevance of pitch accent in academic presentations in L2. The study has theoretical and practical implications, as it suggests the need to include pitch accent/pause proportion in utterance fluency measures in fluency studies as well as in pedagogical practice.

References

Anderson-Hsieh, Janet; Johnson, Ruth and Kenneth Koehler. 1992. The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529-555. http://doi.10.1111/j.1467-1770.192.tb01043.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x

Boersma, Paul and David Weenink. 2007. Praat (Version 6.2.09) [Software]. Available for download from www. praat.org
Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight L. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word, 14, 109-149.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659660

Cruttenden, Alan. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

De Jong, Nivja H. and Ton Wempe. 2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behaviour Research Methods, 41, 385–390. doi: doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.38.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.385

Derwing, Tracey M. and Murray J. Munro. 2015. Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42

Derwing, Tracey M.; Rossiter, Marian; Munro, Murray J. and Ronald Thomson. 2004. Second language fluency: Judgements on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655-679. doi.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x

Derwing, Tracey, Munro, Murray J. and Grace Wiebe. 1998. Evidence in favour of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48 (3), 393-410.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047

Fillmore, Charles J. 1979. On fluency. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler & W. S. Y. Wang (eds.), Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, 85-102. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50012-3

Gilbert, Judy B. 2008. Teaching Pronunciation Using the Prosody Pyramid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Guz, Ewa. 2015. Establishing the fluency gap between native and non-native speech. Research in Language, 13 (3), 230-247. doi.10.1515/rela-2015-2021.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0021

Hahn, Laura D. 2004. Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 201-236. doi.org. 10.2307/3588378.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378

Hincks, Rebecca. 2005. Measures and perception of liveliness in student oral presentation speech: a proposal for automatic feedback mechanism. System 33 (4), 575-591.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.04.002

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. Phonology of English as an International Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit. 2006. Speech Production and Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit and Mariann Denes. 2004. Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 146-164. doi.org/10.1016/jsystem.2004.01.001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001

Lamerton, Jacey. 2001. Public Speaking. Collins.
Google Scholar

Laver, John. 1994. Principles of Phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166621

Lima, Edna F. 2016. Comprehensibility and liveliness in nonnative student oral presentations before and after training: a mixed methods study. System, 63, 121-133.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.10.003

Lintunen, P. & Szyszka, M (in press). Zooming into L2 speech fluency markers of anxious and non-anxious advanced L2 learners – an extreme case sampling report. To appear in Research in Language.
Google Scholar

Morrison, Topher. 2017. The Book on Public Speaking. Morgan James Publishing.
Google Scholar

Munro, Murray J. and Tracey M. Derwing. 1998. The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluation of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 49, 285-310. doi.10.111/1467-9922.00038
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8

Munro, Murray J. and Tracey M. Derwing. 2001. Modelling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speech rate. Studies in Second Langaue Acquisition, 23, 451-468.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101004016

Ramus, Franck; Nespor, Marina and Jacques Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73 (3), 265-292. doi.10.1016.S0010-0277(00)00101-3
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X

Roach, P. 2002. Studying rhythm and timing in English speech: Scientific curiosity., or a classroom necessity? In E. Waniek-Klimczak and P. J. Melia (eds.), Accents and Speech in Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology, 199-206. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Segalowitz, Norman. 2007. Access fluidity, attention control, and the acquisition of fluency in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (1), 181-186.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00047.x

Segalowitz, Norman. 2010. Cognitive Bases of Second Language Fluency. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357

Skehan, Peter. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 510-532. doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047

Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Cambell, Colin and Joan McCormack. 2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50 (2): 447-471.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244

van Maastricht, Lieke, Krahmer Emiel and Marc Swerts. 2016. Native speaker perception of (non-)native prominence patterns: Effects of deviance in pitch accent distribution on accentedness, comprehensibility, intelligibility, and nativeness. Speech Communication, 83, 21-33.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2016.07.008

Wennerstrom, Ann. 2000. The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195143218.001.0001

Wierzchowska, Bożena. 1980. Fonetyka i Fonologia Języka Polskiego. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Wiśniewski, Marek. 1998. Zarys Fonetyki i Fonologii Współczesnego Języka Polskiego. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Google Scholar