Establishing the fluency gap between native and non-native-speech

Ewa Guz

doi:10.1515/rela-2015-0021

Authors

Ewa Guz John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0021

Keywords:

L1/ L2 speech fluency, speed fluency, breakdown fluency, temporal measures of fluency, hesitation phenomena, pausing, speech rate

Abstract

Although various dimensions of speech fluency have so far generated a great deal of research interest, very few accounts have tackled the issue of the relationship between L1 and L2 fluency. Also, little empirical evidence has been provided to support the claim that language users are more fluent in their mother tongue than in a foreign/second language. This study examines the fluency gap between L1 and L2 fluency using a battery of objectively quantifiable temporal measures of speed and breakdown fluency. It also attempts to identify those temporal fluency variables which are affected by the individual way of speaking rather than the degree of automatisation of speech processing and which underlie oral performance both in L1 and L2. The analysis draws on transcriptions of elicited speech samples in L1 (Polish) and L2 (English).

References

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). PRAAT (Version 5.3.51) [Software]. Available from http://www.praat.org/
Google Scholar

Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A. F., Quene, H., Sanders, T., & De Jong, N. H. (2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532214526177
Google Scholar

Brandt, C., & Götz, S. (2011). Fluency versus accuracy in advanced spoken learner language. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 255-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.2.05bra
Google Scholar

Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00046-8
Google Scholar

Cucchiarrini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learner’s fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 107(2), 989-999.
Google Scholar

Cucchiarrini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 111(6), 2862-2873.
Google Scholar

Dechert, H. W. (1980). Pauses and intonation as indicators of verbal planning in secondlanguage speech productions: two examples from a case study. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech (pp. 271-285). The Hague, Mouton.
Google Scholar

De Jong, N. H., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2009, July). Fluency in L2 is related to fluency in L1. Paper presented at the 7th International Symposium on Bilingualism, Utrecht, The Netherelands.
Google Scholar

De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 121-142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(5), 893-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000069
Google Scholar

Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x
Google Scholar

Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990015
Google Scholar

Deschamps, A. (1980). The syntactical distribution of pauses in English as a second language by French students. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech. Studies in honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler (pp. 255-262). The Hague, Mouton.
Google Scholar

Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In D. Kempler & W. S. Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85-102). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in the task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan & M. Swain (Eds), Research pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 75-93). Harlow: Longman.
Google Scholar

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
Google Scholar

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The effect of source of planning and focus on planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 185-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136216889900300303
Google Scholar

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (2013). Anticipating a post-task activity: the effects on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of second language performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 249-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.69.3.249
Google Scholar

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2001). Measuring spoken language: a unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
Google Scholar

Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S027226310426209X
Google Scholar

Gimson, A. C., & Cruttenden, A. (1994). Gimson’s pronunciation of English. Based on Gimson, A. C. 1962. An introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: Arnold.
Google Scholar

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Götz, S. (2013). Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Hilton, H. (2008). The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 153-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389983
Google Scholar

Hincks, R. (2010). Speaking rate and information content in English lingua franca presentations. English for Specific Purposes, 29(1), 4-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.004
Google Scholar

Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.). (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809-854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lang.12084
Google Scholar

Koponen, M., & Riggenbach, H. (2000). Overview: varying perspectives on fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 5-24). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar

Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar

Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 146-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: a quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
Google Scholar

Lennon, P. (2000). The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 25-42). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar

Osborne, J. (2007). Investigating L2 fluency through oral learner corpora. In M. C. Campoy & M. J. Luzón (Eds.), Spoken corpora in applied linguistics (pp. 181-197). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar

Pinget, A. F., Bosker, H. R., Quene, H., & De Jong. N. H. (2014). Native speakers’ perceptions of fluency and accent in L2 speech. Language Testing, 31(3), 349-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532214526177
Google Scholar

Raupach, M. (1980). Temporal variables in first and second language speech production. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech (pp. 271-285). The Hague: Mouton.
Google Scholar

Raupach, M. (1984). Formulae in second language production. In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language productions (pp. 114-137). Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
Google Scholar

Rossiter, M. J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. (2010). The cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262027
Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2003). Task based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X
Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Google Scholar

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302
Google Scholar

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071
Google Scholar

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2005). Strategic and on-line planning: the influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: a synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 199-219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239-273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Towell, R. (2012). Complexity, accuracy and fluency from the perspective of psycholinguistic second language acquisition research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (Eds.) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 47-69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84
Google Scholar

Wiese, R. (1984). Language production in foreign and native languages: Same or different? In H. W. Dechert, D. Möhle & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language productions (pp. 11-25). Tübingen: Narr Verlag.
Google Scholar