Community Resilience Dimensions of Agency and Human Values in the Response of Polish Border Communities to the Refugee Crisis Caused by the Russian Invasion of Ukraine in 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/3071-7779.2024.2.07Słowa kluczowe:
response to crises and uncertainty, refugee and humanitarian crisis, community resilience, human values, agencyAbstrakt
This research aims to explore the role of community resilience in response to the refugee crisis caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 by specifically studying two core dimensions of community resilience, namely agency and human values, to see if they helped to build and enhance community resilience to crisis and uncertainty. In this respect, two cases of responses to the refugee crisis made by two Polish border communities in two corners of Poland, one in the northeast, in Suwałki, in the borderland area often referred to as Suwałki Gap, and the second one in the southeast, in Biecz, known as ‘Little Kraków,’ have been analysed by conducting qualitative interviews with research participants in three interview groups of volunteers, community members, and municipality who privately or professionally provided help for Ukrainian refugees arriving to Poland. Qualitative results of the analysis reveal that deep awareness of members of both Polish border communities about who the aggressor is and who the defender is in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine was the main motivation to activate distinct values of, among others, compassion or mutuality that influenced the response to the arrival of Ukrainian citizens fleeing their invaded homeland and seeking safety and security in Poland – which was mainly a demonstration of sympathy and solidarity with Ukrainian refugees. The findings also reveal that one of the core community resilience dimensions – agency – was exercised collectively and individually, both bottom-up and top-down. Although the decisions were mostly spontaneously dictated by the needs of the heart, the decisions to act were made purposefully. In light of the current refugee crisis, of which the Italian island of Lampedusa is the centre, and with which EU countries have been attempting to cope, it is crucial to continue further research about the cases of responses to such crises, specifically the reactions of the most affected responders. The results of the empirical research on the analysed cases of responses to the refugee crisis and uncertainty caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 made by Polish border communities may contribute to the existing research and discourse on the role and impact of citizens’ and communities’ resilience potential in disaster response and preparedness.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
B_INF1–3. Author’s private archive. Interviews with individuals assisting Ukrainian refugees in Biecz.
S_INF1–3. Author’s private archive. Interviews with individuals assisting Ukrainian refugees in Suwałki.
Attinà F. 2016. Migration Drivers, the EU External Migration Policy and Crisis Management Romanian. “Journal of European Affairs”. 16(4), 15–31.
Baban F., Rygiel K. 2017. Living with Others: Fostering Radical Cosmopolitanism Through Citizenship Politics in Berlin. “Ethics & Global Politics” 10(1), 98–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16544951.2017.1391650
Barber N. 2007. Evolutionary Explanations for Societal Differences and Historical Change in Violent Crime and Single Parenthood. “Cross-Cultural Research” 41(2), 123–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397106298926
Bellamy A. 2015. The Responsibility to Protect Turns Ten. “Ethics & International Affairs” 29(2), 161–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679415000052
Bełdyga N. 2023. The Role of Community Resilience Dimensions of Agency and Resources in Community Resilience to Crises and Uncertainty in Polish Border Communities. “European Integration Studies” 17, 71–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.1.17.33991
Boersma K., Kraiukhina A., Larruina R., Lehota Z., Nury E.O. 2018. A Port in a Storm: Spontaneous Volunteering and Grassroots Movements in Amsterdam. A Resilient Approach to The (European) Refugee Crisis. “Social Policy & Administration” 53(4), 728–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12407
Boin A., Comfort L.K., Demchak C. 2010. The Rise of Resilience. In: Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. (eds), L.K. Comfort, A. Boin, C. Demchak. Pittsburgh, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5hjq0c.5
Bousiou A. 2024. Solidarity and Contestation: Local Refugee Reception Practices At the South-Eastern EU Border Islands. “Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies” 22(1) 84–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.2001614
Boyd R., Richardson P.J. 2005. How Microevolutionary Processes Give Rise to History. In: The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. (eds), R. Boyd, P.J. Richardson. New York, 287–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195165241.003.0016
Dunbar R., Knight C., Power C. 1999. An Evolutionary Approach to Human Culture. In: The Evolution of Culture. (eds), R. Dunbar, C. Knight, C. Power. New Brunswick, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474467889-003
Feischmidt M., Zakarias I. 2019. Politics of Care and Compassion: Civic Help for Refugees and Its Political Implications in Hungary – A Mixed-Methods Approach. In: Refugee Protection and Civil Society in Europe. (eds), M. Feischmidt, L. Pries, C. Cantat. Cham, 59–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92741-1_3
Folke C., Carpenter S.R., Walker B., Scheffer M., Chapin T., Rockström J. 2010. Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. “Ecology and Society” 15(4). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/art20/. Available on-line: September 29, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
Fotaki M. 2022. Solidarity in crisis? Community Responses to Refugees and Forced Migrants In The Greek Islands. “Organization” 29(2), 295–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211051048
Glorius B., Oesch L., Nienaber B., Doomernik J. 2019. Refugee Reception within a Common European Asylum System: Looking at Convergences and Divergences Through a Local-to-Local Comparison. “Erdkunde” 73(1), 19–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2019.01.04
Goroya E., Dhala K., Hayes L. 2015. Volunteers Help Refugees Survive While Europe’s Leaders Still Search For Solutions. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2015/09/volunteers-help-refugees-survive-while-europes-leaders-still-search-for-solutions/solutions/. Available on-line: September 29, 2023.
Hall P.A., Lamont M. 2012. Introduction. In: Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. (eds), P.A. Hall, M. Lamont. Cambridge, 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542425.003
Kallius A., Monterescu D., Rajaram P.K. 2016. Immobilizing mobility: Border Ethnography, Illiberal Democracy, and the Politics of the „Refugee Crisis” in Hungary. “American Ethnologist” 43(1), 25–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12260
Karnitschnig, M. 2022. The Most Dangerous Place on Earth. “Politico”. https://www.politico.eu/article/suwalki-gap-russia-war-nato-lithuania-poland-border/border/. Available on-line: September 30, 2023.
Kilburn H.W. 2009. Personal Values and Public Opinion. “Social Science Quarterly” 90(4), 868–885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00667.x
Ögtem-Young, Ö. 2018. Faith Resilience: Everyday Experiences. “Societies” 8(10), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8010010
Panebianco S. 2016. The Mare Nostrum Operation and the SAR Approach: The Italian Response to Address the Mediterranean Migration Crisis. “EUMedEA Online Working Paper Series” 3, 1–31.
Panebianco S., Fontana I. 2018. When Responsibility to Protect 'Hits Home': the Refugee Crisis and the EU Uesponse. “Third World Quarterly” 39(1), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1369035
Rast M.C., Ghorashi H. 2018. Dancing with 'the Other': Challenges and Opportunities of Deepening Democracy through Participatory Spaces for Refugees. „Social Inclusion” 6(1), 188–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1300
Rast M.C., Younes Y., Smets P., Ghorashi H. 2019. The Resilience Potential of Different Refugee Reception Approaches Taken during the 'Refugee Crisis' in Amsterdam. “Current Sociology” 68(7), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119830759
Rohan M.J. 2000. A Rose by Any Name? The Values Construct. “Personality and Social Psychology Review” 4(3), 255–277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4
Schwartz S.H. 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. “Advances in Experimental Social Psychology” 25, 1–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Szabó Z.P., Vollhardt J.R., Mészáros N. 2020. Through the Lens of History: The Effects of Beliefs About Historical Victimization on Responses to Refugees. “International Journal of Intercultural Relations” 74, 94–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.10.009
van der Veer L. 2020. Residents’ Responses To Refugee Reception: The Cracks and Continuities Between Care and Control. “Ethnic and Racial Studies” 43(16), 368–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1805119
Verplanken B., Holland R. 2002. Motivated decision making: Effects of Activation and Self-Centrality of Values on Choices and Behavior. “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 82(3), 434–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.434
Welzel C., Inglehart R. 2010. Agency, Values, and Well-Being: A Human Development Model. “Social Indicators Research” 97(1), 43–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9557-z
Youkhana E., Sutter O. 2017. Perspectives on the European Border Regime: Mobilization, Contestation and the Role of Civil Society. “Social Inclusion” 5(3), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i3.1127
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
