Buffer composition affects rose bengal dialysis rate through cellulose membrane

Krzysztof Sztandera

doi:10.18778/1730-2366.16.11

Authors

Krzysztof Sztandera University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of General Biophysics, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-7198

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1730-2366.16.11

Keywords:

nanocarriers, dialysis, rose bengal, photodynamic therapy

Abstract

Due to its fluorescent and phototoxic properties, rose bengal (RB) is used in photodynamic therapy. To improve the delivery of RB to its site of action, the application of nanocarrier systems has been proposed. The most promising approach includes the use of pH-responsive nanoparticles. To evaluate the pattern of drug release in different buffers, equilibrium dialysis is commonly used. Here, we used water and two buffers to determine the impact of solvent composition on the aggregation and dialysis rate of RB through a cellulose membrane. The results show that buffer composition does not influence the fluorescent properties of RB. However, the presence of additional ions causes a change in diffusion rate that is most probably linked to the size of RB aggregates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, W. 2010. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010 Annual Meeting and rose bengal: from a wool dye to a cancer therapy. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 35: 469–474.
Google Scholar

Allison, R.R., Downie, G.H., Cuenca, R., Hu, X.H., Childs, C.J.H., Sibata, C.H. 2004. Photosensitizers in clinical PDT. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 1(1): 27–42.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-1000(04)00007-9

Apartsin, E., Knauer, N., Arkhipova, V., Pashkina, E., Aktanova, A., Poletaeva, J., Sánchez-Nieves, J., de la Mata, F.J., Gómez, R. 2020. pH-sensitive dendrimersomes of hybrid triazine-carbosilane dendritic amphiphiles-smart vehicles for drug delivery. Nanomaterials 10(10): 1–15.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10101899

Bron, A.J., Evans, V.E., Smith, J.A. 2003. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea 22(7): 640–650.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008

Capinera, J.L., Squitier, J.M. 2000. Insecticidal activity of photoactive dyes to American and migratory grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Economic Entomology 93(3): 662–666.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.3.662

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2006. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2006(1): pdb.rec8247.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.rec8247

Cossu, A., Ercan, D., Tikekar, R.V., Nitin, N. 2016. Antimicrobial effect of photosensitized rose bengal on bacteria and viruses in model wash water. Food and Bioprocess Technology 9(3): 441–451.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-015-1631-8

Dabrzalska, M., Janaszewska, A., Zablocka, M., Mignani, S., Majoral, J.P., Klajnert-Maculewicz, B. 2017. Cationic phosphorus dendrimer enhances photodynamic activity of rose bengal against basal cell carcinoma cell lines. Molecular Pharmaceutics 14(5): 1821–1830.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00108

Gianotti, E., Estevão, B.M., Cucinotta, F., Hioka, N., Rizzi, M., Renò, F., Marchese, L. 2014. An efficient rose bengal based nanoplatform for photodynamic therapy. Chemistry – A European Journal 20(35): 10921–10925.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201404296

Haney, P., Herting, K., Smith, S. 2013. Separation characteristics of dialysis membranes. Pierce previews. Pierce Protein Biology Products, 2–6.
Google Scholar

Karimi, M., Eslami, M., Sahandi-Zangabad, P., Mirab, F., Farajisafiloo, N., Shafaei, Z., Ghosh, D., Bozorgomid, M., Dashkhaneh, F., Hamblin, M.R. 2016. pH-sensitive stimulus-responsive nanocarriers for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 8(5): 696–716.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1389

Patel, S.P., Carter, B.W., Murthy, R., Sheth, R., Agarwala, S.S., Lu, G., Redstone, E., Balmes, G.S., Rider, H., Rodrigues, D., Wachter, E.A. 2020. Percutaneous hepatic injection of rose bengal disodium (PV-10) in metastatic uveal melanoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 38(15 suppl): 3143.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.3143

Patri, A.K., Kukowska-Latallo, J.F., Baker, J.R. 2005. Targeted drug delivery with dendrimers: comparison of the release kinetics of covalently conjugated drug and non-covalent drug inclusion complex. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 57(15): 2203–2214.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2005.09.014

Qin, J., Kunda, N., Qiao, G., Calata, J.F., Pardiwala, K., Prabhakar, B.S., Maker, A.V. 2017. Colon cancer cell treatment with rose bengal generates a protective immune response via immunogenic cell death. Cell Death and Disease 8(2): e2584.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.473

Snyder, C., Paugh, J.R. 1998. Rose bengal dye concentration and volume delivered via dye-impregnated paper strips. Optometry and Vision Science 75 (5): 339–341.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199805000-00023

Sztandera, K., Działak, P., Marcinkowska, M., Stańczyk, M., Gorzkiewicz, M., Janaszewska, A., Klajnert-Maculewicz, B. 2019. Sugar modification enhances cytotoxic activity of PAMAM-doxorubicin conjugate in glucose-deprived MCF-7 cells – possible role of GLUT1 transporter. Pharmaceutical Research 36(10): 1–11.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-019-2673-9

Sztandera, K., Gorzkiewicz, M., Klajnert-Maculewicz, B. 2020. Nanocarriers in photodynamic therapy – in vitro and in vivo studies. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 12(3): 1–24.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1599

Villani, S., Adami, R., Reverchon, E., Ferretti, A.M., Ponti, A., Lepretti, M., Caputo, I., Izzo, L. 2017. pH-sensitive polymersomes: controlling swelling via copolymer structure and chemical composition. Journal of Drug Targeting 25(9–10): 899–909.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2017.1363216

Wu, H., Zhu, L., Torchilin, V.P. 2013. pH-sensitive poly(histidine)-PEG/DSPE-PEG co-polymer micelles for cytosolic drug delivery. Biomaterials 34(4): 1213–1222.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.072