Shakespeare’s Exceptional Violence: Reading Titus Andronicus with Hannah Arendt and Giorgio Agamben

Stefania Porcelli

doi:10.18778/2353-6098.4.05

Authors

Stefania Porcelli The Graduate Center, CUNY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2353-6098.4.05

Keywords:

Titus Andronicus, violence and power, biopolitics, Giorgio Agamben, Hannah Arendt

Abstract

In this paper I explore the multifaceted relationship between violence, speech and power in the most graphic of Shakespeare’s plays, Titus Andronicus. I take my cue from Hannah Arendt’s reflections on violence as opposed to power, and as something “incapable of speech,” but I read the play through the lens of Giorgio Agamben’s notion of sovereignty as the suspension of the law. I consider the dichotomy speech/muteness as an example not only of the dichotomy power/violence (Arendt) but also of the opposition between bios and zoe, that is the difference between a life worth to be included in the political realm and a life understood as the mere condition of being alive, a condition common to human beings and beasts (according to classical philosophy). In Titus Andronicus, these distinctions are blurred, and zoe becomes fully exposed to the sovereign decision. While the image of a mutilated and mute body cannot match Arendt’s idea of politics as the combination of speech and action bereft of violence, Agamben has developed the notion of a politics that renders life disposable, mute, bare, and can still be called politics or power, and precisely biopower. From this perspective, I argue, Lavinia and the other characters of Titus Andronicus are the embodiment of the concept of “bare life” as developed by Agamben, and Shakespeare’s Rome is a State of exception and of exceptional violence.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. 1995. Trans. Daniel Heller- Roazen. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998. Print.
Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. 1958. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1998.
Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. 1963. London: Penguin, 1990. Print.
Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan. Introduction. Titus Andronicus. Ed. Jonathan Bate. London: Metheun, 1995. Print.
Google Scholar

Calderwood, James. Shakespearean Metadrama: The Argument of the Play in Titus Andronicus, Love’s Labor’s Lost, Romeo and Juliet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and Richard II. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1971. Print.
Google Scholar

Cantor, Paul. Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1976. Print.
Google Scholar

Charney, Maurice. Shakespeare’s Roman Plays: The Function of Imagery in the Drama. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1961. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674331822

Charney, Maurice. “Titus Andronicus.” Titus Andronicus: Critical Essays. Ed. Philip C. Kolin. New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1995. 261-64. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724911-19

Cohen, Derek. Shakespeare’s Culture of Violence. London: St. Martin‘s, 1993. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379442

Del Sapio Garbero, Maria, Nancy Isenberg, and Maddalena Pennacchia, eds. Questioning Bodies in Shakespeare’s Rome. Goettingen: V&R Unipress, 2010. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14220/9783862347407

Eliot, T.S. Selected Essays, 1917-1932. London: Faber & Faber, 1932. Print.
Google Scholar

Foakes, R.A. Shakespeare and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Random House, 1995. Print.
Google Scholar

Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred. Trans. Patrick Gregory. London: Continuum, 2005. Print.
Google Scholar

Green, Douglas E. “‘Her Martyr‘d Signs’: Gender and Tragedy in Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 40.3 (1989): 317-26. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2870726

Harris, Bernice, “Sexuality as a Signifier for Power Relations: Using Lavinia, of Shakespeare‘s Titus Andronicus.” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 38.3 (1996): 383-406. Print.
Google Scholar

Hunter, G.K. “Shakespeare‘s Earliest Tragedies: Titus Andronicus and Romeo and Juliet.” Shakespeare Survey 27 (1974): 1-9. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521204682.001

Lakoff, George, “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf.” Engulfed in War: Just War and the Persian Gulf. Ed. Brien Hallett. Honolulu: Matsunaga Institute for Peace, 1991, 95-111. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.61.36lak

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The U of Chicago P, 2003. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001

Lucking, David. Making Sense in Shakespeare. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2012. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207782

Machiavelli, Nicolo. The Prince. Trans. W. K. Marriott. North Charleston, South Carolina: Millenium Publications, 2014. Print.
Google Scholar

Marshall, Cynthia. “The Pornographic Economy of Titus Andronicus.” Shattering of the Self: Violence, Subjectivity, and Early Modern Texts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2002. 106- 37. Print.
Google Scholar

Miola, Robert. Shakespeare’s Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1983. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518966

Price, H.T. “The Authorship of Titus Andronicus.” Titus Andronicus: Critical Essays. Ed. Philip C. Kolin. New York: Garland Publishing, 1995. 75-98. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724911-7

Reinhard Lupton, Julia. Thinking with Shakespeare: Essays on Politics and Life. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2011. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226711034.001.0001

Robertson, Elizabeth, and Christine M. Rose. Representing Rape in Medieval and Early Modern Literature. New York: Palgrave, 2001. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10448-9

Robertson, John M. Did Shakespeare Write Titus Andronicus: A Study in Elizabethan Literature. London: Watts, 1905. Print.
Google Scholar

Rowe, Katherine A. “Dismembering and Forgetting in Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 45.3 (1994): 279-303. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2871232

Scarry, Elaine. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford UP, 1985. Print.
Google Scholar

Scarry, Elaine. “Consent and the Body: Injury, Departure, and Desire.” New Literary History 21.4 (1990): 867-96. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/469190

Shakespeare, William. Titus Andronicus. Ed. Jonathan Bate. London: Methuen, 1995. Print.
Google Scholar

Stanavage, Liberty, and Paxton Hehmeyer, eds. Titus Out of Joint: Reading the Fragmented Titus Andronicus. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. Print.
Google Scholar

St. Hilaire, Danielle A. “Allusion and Sacrifice in Titus Andronicus.” SEL 49.2 (2009): 311-31. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.0.0055

Taylor, Quentin. “‘To Order Well the State’: The Politics of Titus Andronicus.” Interpretation 32 (2005): 125-50. Print.
Google Scholar

Tricomi, Albert. “The Aesthetics of Mutilation in Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Survey 27 (1974): 11-19. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521204682.002

Tricomi, Albert. “The Mutilated Garden in Titus Andronicus.” Shakespeare Studies 9 (1976): 89-102. Print.
Google Scholar

Tooker, Jessica. “Productive Violence in Titus Andronicus.” Renaissance Papers (2011): 31-40. Print.
Google Scholar

Walker, Jarrett. “Voiceless Bodies and Bodiless Voices: The Drama of Human Perception in Coriolanus.” Shakespeare Quarterly 43.2 (1992): 170-85. Print.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2870880