Idle Games: A Cozy Genre Turned Exploitative

Justin Buergi

doi:10.18778/2391-8551.12.02

Authors

Justin Buergi Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0555-6728

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.12.02

Keywords:

cozy, casual, idle, exploitation, microtransaction, optimization

Abstract

This paper explores the connection between cozy games and idle games, analyzing shared elements and underlying principles. Cozy games are characterized by an emphasis on comfort, relaxation, and safety, offering players an escape from the pressure of daily life through soothing gameplay experiences. Meanwhile, idle games feature waiting as a core mechanic, allowing progress to be made even in the player’s absence. This provides a continuous sense of growth and progression throughout the player’s day but may also lead to frequent engagements to optimize production. Furthermore, this desire for continuous progress may also be exploited by developers who capitalize on player impatience by incorporating microtransactions that expedite progression in exchange for real-world money. Thus, while idle games can fit within the cozy game genre, their monetization practices raise questions about ethical responsibility on the part of game developers and taint the genre’s potential as a serene gaming experience.

Author Biography

Justin Buergi, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Justin Buergi is a Ph.D. Candidate in Critical Game Design at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His research is focused on the domain of idle games, with a particular emphasis on investigating the underlying motivations that prompt players to engage in regular and recurrent interactions with instances of this genre. Moreover, his research delves into the strategic methodologies employed by game developers to leverage these motivational factors in order to compel frequent interactions and spending on microtransactions.

References

Alharthi, S.A., Alsaedi, O., Toups, Z.O., Tanenbaum, T.J., & Hammer, J. (2018). Playing to Wait: A Taxonomy of Idle Games. In: CHI ’18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174195
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174195

Alharthi, S.A., Toups, Z.A., Alsaedi, O., Hammer, J., & Tanenbaum, T.J. (2018). The Pleasure of Playing Less: A Study of Incremental Games Through the Lens of Kittens. ETC Press.
Google Scholar

Amabile, T., & Kramer, S. (2011). The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work. Harvard Business Press.
Google Scholar

Bravo, I. (2019, November 28). Hyper-Casual vs Idle Games: The Latest Trends in Mobile Games. GameAnalytics. https://gameanalytics.com/blog/hyper-casual-vs-idle-games/ (accessed on March 3, 2024).
Google Scholar

Buday, R., Baranowski, T., & Thompson, D. (2012). Fun and Games and Boredom. GAMES FOR HEALTH: Research, Development, and Clinical Applications, 1(4), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fg4h.2012.0026
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2012.0026

Carter, M., Nansen, B., & Gibbs, M.R. (2014). Screen Ecologies, Multi-Gaming and Designing for Different Registers of Engagement. In: CHI PLAY ’14: Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 37–46). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658686
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658686

Cutting, J., Gundry, D., & Cairns, P. (2019). Busy Doing Nothing? What Do Players Do in Idle Games? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 122, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.006
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.006

Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Conceptualizations of Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination. In: E.. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (pp. 11–40). Springer.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_2

Demaine, E.D., Ito, H., Langerman, S., Lynch, J., Rudoy, M., & Xiao, K. (2020). Cookie Clicker. Graphs and Combinatorics, 36, 269–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-019-02093-4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00373-019-02093-4

Derrida, J. (1967). Writing and Difference. Éditions du Seuil.
Google Scholar

Deterding, S. (2016). Progress Wars: Idle Games and the Demarcation of “Real” Games. In: DiGRA/FDG ’16 – Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG. Digital Games Research Association and Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games.
Google Scholar

Deterding, S. (2019). Cookie Clicker. In: M.T. Payne & N.B. Huntemann (Eds.), How to Play Video Games (pp. 200–207). New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479830404.003.0028
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479830404.003.0028

Evans, E. (2016). The Economics of Free: Freemium Games, Branding and the Impatience Economy. Convergence, 22(6), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567052
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514567052

Fizek, S. (2018). Interpassivity and the Joy of Delegated Play in Idle Games. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 3(3), 137–163.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v3i3.81

Fizek, S. (2022). Playing at a Distance: Borderlands of Video Game Aesthetic. MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13605.001.0001

Howe, C. (2017, June 30). The Design of Time: Understanding Human Attention and Economies of Engagement. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIrfxZ4KbOA (accessed on March 3, 2024).
Google Scholar

Keogh, B., & Richardson, I. (2018). Waiting to Play: The Labour of Background Games. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417705603
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417705603

Larsson, C. (2019). An Investigation of Compulsive Interactions and Mechanics in Incremental Idle Clickers [Bachelor dissertation, Malmö University]. DiVA portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1481219&dswid=2727
Google Scholar

Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

Montola, M., Stenros, J., & Waern, A. (2009). Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. CRC Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780080889795

Perdomo, P. (2021). Grinding from a Player’s and Game Designer’s Point of View [Bachelor dissertation, Malmö University]. DiVA portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1564771&dswid=7781
Google Scholar

Richmond, S.C. (2015). Vulgar Boredom, or What Andy Warhol Can Teach Us about Candy Crush. Journal of Visual Culture, 14(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914567143
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914567143

Ruffino, P. (2021). The End of Capitalism: Disengaging from the Economic Imaginary of Incremental Games. Games and Culture, 16(2), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019886242
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019886242

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68

Sadprasid, B., Tabor, A., Scheme, E., & Bateman, S. (2022). Focus Cat: Designing Idle Games to Promote Intermittent Practice and On-Going Adherence of Breathing Exercise for ADHD. In: K. Gerling, J. Iacovides, R. Malaka, B. Bonsignore, & J. Frommel (Eds.), CHI PLAY ’22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 303–310). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505270.3558381
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3505270.3558381

Salen Tekinbas, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Short, T.X., Ordon, A., Hurd, D., Howe, C., Forbes, J., Eiserloh, S., Diaz, J., Cook, D., & Meiners, R. (2018, January 24). Cozy Games. Lostgarden. https://lostgarden.home.blog/2018/01/24/cozy-games/ (accessed on March 3, 2024).
Google Scholar

Spiel, K., Alharthi, S.A., Cen, A.J.L., Hammer, J., Nacke, L.E., Toups, Z.O., & Tanenbaum, T.J. (2019). “It Started as a Joke”: On the Design of Idle Games. In: CHI PLAY ’19: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 495–508). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347180
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347180

Tanenbaum, T.J., & Bizzocchi, J. (2009). Rock Band: A Case Study in the Design of Embodied Interface Experience. In: S.N. Spencer (Ed.), Sandbox ’09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (pp. 127–134). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1581073.1581093
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1581073.1581093

Yee, N. (2016). The Surprising Profile of Idle Clicker Gamers. Quantic Foundry.
Google Scholar

Bogost, I. (2010). Crow Clicker.
Google Scholar

Fredricksen, E. (2002). Progress Quest. Eric Fredricksen, pkunk.
Google Scholar

Hyper Hippo Productions. (2014). Adventure Capitalist. Hyper Hippo Productions, Kongregate Inc.
Google Scholar

Last Day of Work. (2017). Virtual Villagers: Origin 2. Last Day of Work, Gogii Games.
Google Scholar

Orteil. (2013). Cookie Clicker. DashNet, Playsaurus.
Google Scholar

Studio Seufz. (2019). The Longing. Application Systems Heidelberg.
Google Scholar

Ubisoft. (2018). Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. Ubisoft.
Google Scholar