An Experiential Comparative Tool for Board Games

Authors

  • David Chircop

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.03.01

Keywords:

board games, analysis, comparison, player experience, typology

Abstract

In the field of game studies, contemporary board games have until now remained relatively unexplored. The recent years have allowed us to witness the emergence of the occasional academic texts focusing on board games – such as Eurogames (Woods, 2012), Characteristics of Games (Elias et al. 2013), and most recently Game Play: Paratextuality in Contemporary Board Games (Booth, 2015). The mentioned authors all explore board games from diverse viewpoints but none of these authors present a viable and practical analytical tool to allow us to examine and differentiate one board game from another. In this vein, this paper seeks to present an analytical comparative tool intended specifically for board games. The tool builds upon previous works (Aarseth et al. 2003; Elias et al. 2012; and Woods 2012) to show how four categories – rules, luck, interaction and theme – can interact on different levels to generate diverse gameplay experiences. Such a tool allows to score games objectively and separately in each of the categories to create a combined gameplay experience profile for each board game. Following this, the paper proceeds to present numerous practical examples of contemporary board games and how it can be used from a design perspective and an analytical perspective alike.

Author Biography

David Chircop

David Chircop is a game designer from Malta. He was involved in the international publication of more than 10 board games in roles such as Designer, Developer, Project Lead and Publisher. His master’s thesis focused on building a model for the analysis of player experience in contemporary board games. Currently, David works as a Game Designer at CD Projekt RED.

References

Aarseth, E., Smedstad, S., & Sunnana, L. (2003). A Multi-Dimensional Typology of Games. Utrecht: DiGRA.
Google Scholar

Boardgamegeek.com. (2015). BoardGameGeek | Gaming Unplugged Since 2000. Retrieved 1 July 2015, from http://www.boardgamegeek.com
Google Scholar

Booth, P. (2015). Game Play: Paratextuality in Contemporary Board Games. New York: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar

Caillois, R. (1961). Man, Play and Games. Urbana and Chicago: Univeristy of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar

Calleja, G. (2011). In-Game. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8429.001.0001

Costikyan, G. (2008). Uncertainty in Games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Costikyan, G., & Davidson, D. (2011). Tabletop. Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
Google Scholar

Elias, G., Garfield, R., & Gutschera, K. (2012). Characteristics of Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Elverdam, C., & Aarseth, E. (2007). Game Classification and Game Design: Construction Through Critical Analysis. Games and Culture, 2(1), 3–22. doi:10.1177/1555412006286892
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412006286892

Garfield, R. (2011). Luck in Games. Presentation, NYU Game Series.
Google Scholar

Knizia, R. (1999). Dice Games Properly Explained. Tadworth, Surrey: Right Way.
Google Scholar

Murray, J. H. (1998). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Parlett, D. (1999). The Oxford History of Board Games. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Smith, Q., & Dean, P. (2011). It’s War: Player Interaction. Shut Up & Sit Down. Retrieved 1 July 2015, from http://www.shutupandsitdown.com/blog/post/its-warplayer-interaction/
Google Scholar

Woods, S. (2012). Eurogames. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co.
Google Scholar

Boelinger, Ch. (2012). Archipelago. [Board Game], Asmodee.
Google Scholar

Borg, R. (2006). Commands and Colors: Ancients. [Board Game], GMT Games.
Google Scholar

Calhamer, A. B. (1959). Diplomacy. [Board Game], Avalon Hill.
Google Scholar

Chircop, D. & Massa, Y. (2015). …and then, we held hands. [Board Game], LudiCreations.
Google Scholar

Chvátil, V. (2007). Galaxy Trucker. [Board Game], Czech Games Edition.
Google Scholar

Chvátil, V. (2011). Mage Knight Board Game. [Board Game], WizKids Games.
Google Scholar

Darrow, C., Maggie. (1935). Monopoly. [Board Game], Parker Brothers.
Google Scholar

Dorn, R. (2014). Istanbul. [Board Game], Pegasus Spiele.
Google Scholar

Eskridge, D. (2009). The Resistance. [Board Game], Indie Boards and Cards.
Google Scholar

Feld, S. (2011). The Castles of Burgundy. [Board Game], Alea.
Google Scholar

Hostettler, U. (1991). Tichu. [Board Game], ABACUSSPIELE.
Google Scholar

Inman, M., Lee, E., & Small, Sh. (2015). Exploding Kittens. [Board Game], self-published.
Google Scholar

Knizia, R. (1998). Through the Desert. [Board Game], Fantasy Flight Games.
Google Scholar

Konieczka, C. (2008). Battlestar Galactica. [Board Game], Fantasy Flight Games.
Google Scholar

Lacerda, V. (2012). CO2. [Board Game], Giochix.it.
Google Scholar

Lambert, R., Rilstone, A., Wallis, J. (1993). Once Upon a Time: The Storytelling Card Game. [Board Game], Atlas Games.
Google Scholar

Leacock, M. (2007). Pandemic. [Board Game], Z-Man Games.
Google Scholar

Pratt, A. (1949). Clue. [Board Game], Leeds, Unknown.
Google Scholar

Rosenberg, U. (2007). Agricola. [Board Game], Lookout Games.
Google Scholar

Ross, S. (2010). Haggis. [Board Game], Indie Boards and Cards.
Google Scholar

Roubira, J.-L. (2008). Dixit. [Board Game], Libellund.
Google Scholar

Teuber, C. (1995). Die Siedler von Catan. [Board Game], KOSMOS.
Google Scholar

Ushan, A. (2014). Spyfall. [Board Game], Cryptozoic Entertainment.
Google Scholar

Wilson, K. (2005). Descent: Journeys in the Dark. [Board Game], Fantasy Flight Games.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2017-08-22

How to Cite

Chircop, D. (2017). An Experiential Comparative Tool for Board Games. Replay. The Polish Journal of Game Studies, 3(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-8551.03.01

Issue

Section

Articles