Rola orientacji temporalnej na teraźniejszość w wyjaśnianiu preferowanej strategii seksualnej

Przemysław Zdybek

doi:10.18778/1427-969X.16.09

Autor

Przemysław Zdybek Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Opolski

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1427-969X.16.09

Słowa kluczowe:

psychological time, temporal perspective, sociosexuality

Abstrakt

This paper presents two researches conducted to verify the hypothesis that present temporal orientation is significant variable in describing human preferences of sexual strategies. First survey was conducted using as a independent variable two scales measuring temporal orientation: Carpe Diem (Sobol & Oleś, 2002), AION (Bajcar & Nosal, 2004), as a dependent variable was taken preferred sexual strategies measured by Sociosexsual Orientation Inventory (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991). Comparing participants with high rate of present temporal orientation vs low rate of present temporal orientation shows statistically significant differences in Sociosexuality Orientation Scale. Second research confirm hypothesis that participants declaring being sexoholic have higher rate of temporal concentration on presence measured by ZPTI (Zimbardo & Boyd, 2009).

Bibliografia

Boyd J.N. i Zimbardo P.G. (1997), Constructing Time After Death: The transcendental-future time perspective, „Time & Society”, 6(1), 35–54.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X97006001002

Buss D.M. (2000), Ewolucja pożądania. Jak ludzie dobierają się w pary, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
Google Scholar

Buss D.M. (2001), Psychologia ewolucyjna. Jak wytłumaczyć społeczne zachowania człowieka? Najnowsze koncepcje, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
Google Scholar

Buss D.M. i Barnes M.F. (1986), Preferences in human mate selection, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 50, 559–570.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559

Buss D.M. i Schmidt D.P. (1993), Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating, „Psychological Review”, 100, 204–232.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

Buss D.M. i Schmit D.P. (1996), Strategic Self-Promotion and Competitor Derogation: Sex and Context Effects on the Perceived Effectiveness of Mate Attraction Tactics, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 70, 6, 1185–1204.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1185

Cottle T.J. (1976), Perceiving time. A psychological investigation of with men and women, Wiley&Sons, New York.
Google Scholar

Covas V.L. (2000), Temporal perspective, purpose in life, and optimism as factors of resiliency in at-risk male adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering (60) 5822.
Google Scholar

Droit R.P. (2004), 101 zabaw filozoficznych, GWP, Gdańsk.
Google Scholar

Hall C.S. i Lindzey G. (2002), Teorie osobowości, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Hall E.T. (1999), Taniec życia. Inny wymiar czasu, Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie MUZA, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Hawking S. (2007), Krótka historia czasu, „Wydawnictwo Zysk i s-ka”, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Lewin K. (1951), Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers, Harper New York.
Google Scholar

Łukaszewski W. (1983), Osobowość – orientacja temporalna – ustosunkowanie do zmian, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Nosal C.S. (2000), Czas jako wymiar regulacji zachowania. Problemy psychologii temporalnej, [w:] O różnych sposobach uprawiania psychologii, J. Brzeziński, S. Kowalik (red.), Zysk i S-ka, Poznań, 106–130.
Google Scholar

Nosal C.S. (2002), Problem umysłowych reprezentacji czasu i poziomów temporalności, „Studia Psychologiczne”, 10, 55–70.
Google Scholar

Nosal C.S. i Bajcar B. (2004), Czas psychologiczny: wymiary, struktura, konsekwencje, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Penton-Voak I.S., Perret D.I., Castles D.L., Kobayashi T., Burt D.M., Murray L.K. i Minamisawa R. (1999), Menstrual cycle alters face preference, „Nature”, 388, 741–742.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/21557

Penton-Voak I.S. i Perret D.I. (2000), Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence, „Evolution and Human Behavior”, 21, 39–48.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1

Simpson J.A. i Gangestad S.W. (1991), Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 60, 870–883.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870

Simpson J., Gangestad S., Christensen P. i Leck K. (1999), Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality,and intrasexual competitive tactics, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 76(1),159–172.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.159

Sobol M. i Oleś P. (2002), Orientacja temporalna carpe diem a poczucie satysfakcji z życia, „Przegląd Psychologiczny”, 45, 3, 331–346.
Google Scholar

Szymańska I. (2006), Związki orientacji socioseksualnej kobiet i mężczyzn z preferencjami dymorfizmu płciowego, (niepublikowana praca magisterska) Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław.
Google Scholar

Trivers R.L. (1972), Parental investment and sexual selection, [w:] Sexual selection and the descent of man, B. Campbell (red.), Aldine, 1871–1971 (136–179), Chicago, IL.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315129266-7

Lew Starowicz Z. (2007), Zdrowie seksualne – historia, kryteria, promocja, [w:] Zdrowie seksualne, J. Rzepka (red.), Górnośląska Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna im. Kardynała Augusta Hlonda, Mysłowice.
Google Scholar

Öner B. (2002), Self-Monitoring and Future Time Orientation in Romantic Relationships, „Journal of Psychology”, 136(4), 420.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209604168

Shell D. i Husman J. (2001), The Multivariate Dimensionally of Personal Control and Future Time Perspective Beliefs in Achievement and Self-Regulation, „Contemporary Educational Psychology”, 26 (4), 481–506.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1073

Wilczyńska J., Drwal R.Ł. (1995), Opracowanie Kwestionariusza Aprobaty Społecznej (KAS), [w:] Adaptacja kwestionariuszy osobowości. Wybrane zagadnienia i techniki, P. Brzozowski, P. Oleś (red.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Zaleski Z. (1994), Psychology of future orientation, TN KUL, Lublin [Poland].
Google Scholar

Zaleski Z. (1996), Future anxiety: Concept, measurement and preliminary research, „Personality and Individual Differences”, 21, 165–174.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00070-0

Zaleski Z. (2002), Future horizon: A challenging concept for psychology, [w:] Adolescents’ future-orientation: Theory and research, J. Trempała, L.-E. Malmberg (red.), Peter Lang GmbH, Frankfurt am Main [Germany], 123–129.
Google Scholar

Zaleski Z. (2005), Future Orientation and Anxiety, [w:] Understanding Behaviour in the Context of Time, Theory, Research and Application, A. Strathman i J. Joireman (red.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New York, 125–141.
Google Scholar

Zimbardo P.G. i Boyd J.N. (1999), Putting time in perspective: a valid reliable individual differences metric, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 77, 1271–1288.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271

Zimbardo P.G. i Boyd J.N. (2009), Paradoks czasu, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Zuckerman M., Bone R., Neary R., Mangelsdorff D. i Brustman B. (1972), What is the sensation seeker? Personality trait and experience correlates of the Sensation-Seeking Scales, „Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology”, 39(2), 308–321.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033398

Yost M. i Zurbriggen E. (2006), Gender Differences in the Enactment of Sociosexuality: An Examination of Implicit Social Motives, Sexual Fantasies, Coercive Sexual Attitudes, and Aggressive Sexual Behavior, „Journal of Sex Research”, 43(2), 163–173.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552311