Performative Discourse of Drag Queens: A Sociolinguistic Study

Maria Szymańska

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.18.1.02

Authors

Maria Szymańska University of Lodz, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.18.1.02

Keywords:

drag queens, discourse, political discourse, language and identity

Abstract

The article presents the analysis of two speeches given by Rory O’Neill, also known as Panti Bliss, who is so far the most recognisable Irish drag queen. Apart from being a drag queen, Rory O’Neill is also a political activist whose performances were part of the campaign before the referendum concerning the 34th Amendment to the Constitution of Ireland. In the analysis both these aspects of the speaker’s identity are taken into consideration. Although the analysis is mostly linguistic, it also considers extralinguistic aspects of communication, e.g. the performer’s appearance on stage, as contextual elements are essential in sociolinguistic contexts. Thus, the analysis draws from the theoretical background focused on political discourse and the language used by drag queens to a detailed account of the two speeches in order discuss them in relation to the standards of both a drag performance and a political speech.

References

Ackroyd, Peter. 1979. Dressing up – Transvestism and drag: The history of an obsession. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Google Scholar

Ayer, Alfred Jules. 1936. Language, Truth and Logic. London: Gollancz.
Google Scholar

Baker, Roger. 1994. Drag: A history of female impersonation in the performing arts. New York: NYU Press.
Google Scholar

Barnlund, Dean C. 1988. Communication in a global village. In L. A. Samovar and R. E. Porter (eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader, 5th ed., 5–14. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar

Barrett, Rusty. 1998. Markedness and styleswitching in performances by African American drag queens. In C. Myers-Scotton (ed.), Codes and consequences: Choosing linguistic varieties, 139–161. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Barrett, Rusty. 1999. Indexing polyphonous identity in the speech of African American drag queens. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang and L. L. Sutton (eds.), Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse, 313–331. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Barrett, Rusty. 2017. From drag queens to leathermen: Language, gender, and gay male subcultures. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390179.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390179.001.0001

Beard, Adrian. 2000. The Language of Politics. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: One the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Carter, David. 2005. Stonewall: The riots that sparked the gay revolution. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706

Chauncey, George. 1994. Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the making of the gay male world, 1890-1940. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Duberman, Martin. 1993. Stonewall. New York: Dutton.
Google Scholar

Feinberg, Leslie. 1996. Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to RuPaul. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar

Fleisher, Julian. 1996. The Drag Queens of New York, NY: An illustrated field guide. New York: Riverhead Books.
Google Scholar

Garber, Marjorie. 1983. Vested interests: Cross- dressing and cultural anxiety. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Gilbert, Sandra M. 1980. Costumes of the mind: Transvestism as metaphor in modern literature. Critical Inquiry, 7, 391– 417. https://doi.org/10.1086/448105
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448105

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar

Greaf, Caitlin. 2016. Drag queens and gender identity. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(6), 655-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087308
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1087308

Hilbert, Jeffrey. 1995. The politics of drag. In C. K. Creekmur, and A. Doty (eds.), Out in culture: Gay, lesbian and queer essays on popular culture, 463– 469. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1220htt.32
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822397441-030

Jones, Jason and Wareing, Shan. 1999. Language and Politics. In L. Thomas, et al. (eds.), Language, Society and Power, 31-47. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar

Norton, Rictor. 2016. Myth of the modern homosexual: Queer history and the search for cultural unity. London: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474286916
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474286916

Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In A. Duranti (ed.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 335-358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Raymond, Janice. 1994. [1979]. The transsexual empire: The making of the she-male. New York: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar

Raymond, Janice. 1996. The politics of transgenderism. In R. Ekins and D. Kind (eds)., Blending genders: Social aspects of cross- dressing and sex-changing, 215– 223. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Rupp, Leila. J., Shapiro, Eve Illiana and Taylor, Verta. 2010. Drag queens and drag kings: The difference gender makes. Sexualities, 13, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460709352725
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460709352725

Sbisà, Marina. 1999. Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. In J. Verschueren (ed.), Language and ideology. Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, 492-509. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
Google Scholar

Showalter, Elaine. 1983. Critical cross-dressing: Male feminists and the woman of the year. Raritan, 3(2), 130–149.
Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz and P. K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, 197–213. New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar

Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.
Google Scholar

Szymańska, Maria. 2018. Dyskurs „drag queens” – kilka refleksji na temat performatywnej roli języka. In I. Witczak-Plisiecka and M. Deckert (eds.), Dyskurs – współczesne opracowania i perspektywy badawcze, 127-139. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John. C. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader, 56-65.
Google Scholar

Ungerer, Friedrich and Schmid, Hans-Jorg. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Trowbridge: Sage.
Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 2005. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schäffne and A. L. Wenden (eds.), Language & peace, 41-58. Singapore: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Williamson, Judith. 1986. Consuming passions: The dynamics of popular culture. London: Marion Boyars.
Google Scholar

Wojtczak, Sylwia, Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona and Augustyn Rafał. 2017. Metafory konceptualne jako narzędzia rozumowania i poznania prawniczego. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Poland.
Google Scholar