Verbal Warfare in the Polish Media: An Analysis Of Conceptual Metaphors In Political Discourse

Authors

  • Ewa Gieroń-Czepczor PWSZ, Racibórz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0017-5

Abstract

Cognitive semanticists, especially George Lakoff and the Rockridge Institute, joined the analysts of political discourse in the 1990s. Much has been said about the metaphorical language of the US leaders, Bush and Obama, especially during the time of the War on Terror, and a range of conceptual metaphors have been pinpointed, such as THE STATE AS A PERSON, THE STATE AS THE FAMILY, THE USA AS A MORAL LEADER/DEFENDER OF THE JUST CAUSE, WAR AS MEDICINE, ARGUMENT IS WAR. Polish political discourse is, in contrast, largely focused on internal issues and debates. The resulting image of the nation and its aims, as found in official and unofficial statements made by the Polish government and parliamentarians portrays a pervading simplistic and dualistic picture of the nation and – more importantly – suggests that all aspects of politics evoke the imagery of war waged against all other parties involved. This study traces conceptual metaphors in a large corpus of material. The primary sources include interviews with politicians as well as texts written by journalists commenting on the Polish political scene and the latest developments. Another source is daily news on popular portals and online services of selected Polish dailies and magazines. All the materials cover a period between September 2011 and mid-January 2012. The outcome of the analyses of spoken and written data reveals that political, social and economic antagonisms are well fed by language which highlights dichotomies and depicts ‘the others’ as the source of all evil. The metaphorical language largely follows the patterns investigated and described by Lakoff, providing a wealth of material to support the claim that ARGUMENT IS WAR. In the light of the collected data, multiple ‘wars’ are in progress successfully generating language of conflict.

References

Bakhtin, Michail (1981). “Discourse in the novel”. In Holquist, M. (Ed.) The Dialogic Imagination: four essays by Bakhtin, M. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Michail (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Google Scholar

Barnden, John A. (2008). “Metaphor and Artificial Intelligence. Why They Matter to Each Other”. In Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (311-338). Cambridge: CUP.
Google Scholar

Boski, Paweł, Fons Van de Vijver, Helena Hurme & Jolanta Miluska (1999). “Perception and Evaluation of Polish Cultural Femininity in Poland, the United States, Finland, and the Netherlands”. Cross-Cultural Research, May 1999 33, 131- 161, doi:10.1177/106939719903300201
Google Scholar

Bralczyk: to media kształtują język polityków (2009). Gazeta Prawna [online]. Retrieved from http://www.gazetaprawna.pl/wiadomosci/artykuly/365077,bralczyk_to_media_ksztaltuja_jezyk_politykow.html
Google Scholar

Cortés de los Ríos, Enriqueta (2002). “Cognitive Semantics and Axiology: A New Proposal to Study Metaphor in Economics Advertising Discourse”. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 15 (2000), 39-47. Universidad de Alicante.
Google Scholar

Duszak, Anna (2006). “Why 'New' Newspeak? Axiological Insights into Language Ideologies and Practices in Poland”. In C. Mar-Molinero & P. Stevenson (Eds.), Language Ideologies, Policies and Practices: Language and the Future of Europe (91-103). Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: CUP.
Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka (1997). Discourse and Culture. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (231-259). London: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman (1994). "Conversationalization of Public Discourse and the Authority of the Consumer." In R. Keat, N. Whiteley & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), The Authority of the Consumer (253-268). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Fetzer, Anita & Elda Weizman (2006). “Political Discourse as Mediated and Public Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 143-153.
Google Scholar

Feyaerts, Kurt (1999). “Metonymic hierarchies. The conceptualization of stupidity in German idiomatic expressions”. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden, Metonymy in Language and Thought (309-332). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Kamińska-Szmaj, Irena (2008). “Język polityki na tle przemian kulturowych”. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis, no. 3060, Język a kultura, tom 20, 253-265. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski.
Google Scholar

Kloch, Zbigniew (2010). Agresja i kłótnie w mediach a potoczne zachowania językowe. Nauka 2/2010, pp.113-128. Polska Akademia Nauk. http://www.portalwiedzy.pan.pl/images/stories/pliki/publikacje/nauka/2010/02/N-2-2010-9-Kloch.pdf
Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2002) Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Magdoń, Andrzej (1995). Duch zabawy w mediach. Zeszyty Prasoznawcze no 3-4, 7 – 16.
Google Scholar

Oniszczuk, Zbigniew (2011). “Mediatyzacja polityki i polityzacja mediów. Dwa wymiary wzajemnych relacji”. Studia Medioznawcze, no 4 (47), 11-22. Warszawa: Instytut Dziennikarstwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar

Panel dyskusyjny "Język polskiej polityki po 1989 roku" (2009, October 27). Senat RP. Wydarzenia. Retrieved from http://ww2.senat.pl/k7/agenda/wydarz/2009/091027.htm
Google Scholar

Street, John (2006). Mass media, polityka, demokracja. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah (1998, March 27). The Argument Culture. The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer Transcript. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/gergen/march98/tannen_3-27.html
Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna (1991). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Zimny, Rafał & Paweł Nowak (2009). Słownik polszczyzny politycznej po 1989 roku. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Zinken, Jörg, Iina Hellsten & Brigitte Nerlich (2008). “Discourse metaphors”. In R. Dirven, R. Frank, T. Ziemke & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness (363-385). Berlin: Mouton.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

How to Cite

Gieroń-Czepczor, E. (2013). Verbal Warfare in the Polish Media: An Analysis Of Conceptual Metaphors In Political Discourse. Research in Language, 11(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0017-5

Issue

Section

Articles