Creativity in Meaning Construction and Translation – A Cognitive Perspective on the Humurous Language Used by Big Friendly Giant in Roald Dahl’s the BFG in its English, Polish and Portuguese Versions

Sylwia Klos

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.22.3.04

Authors

Sylwia Klos University of Silesia, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.22.3.04

Keywords:

conceptual blending, mental maps, creative cognition, humour, children’s literature

Abstract

The paper explains how our mind creates a meaning in a wordplay. The model of mental maps (Author, 2020) based on the theory of conceptual blending (Fauconnier,1997, Fauconnier & Turner, 2002) and the geneplore model based on the theory of creative cognition (Finke, et al, 1992) presented in the paper describe the operations in the mind related to generating, exploring and transforming ideas and/or linguistic and non-linguistic units that result in the emergence of a new meaning embedded in the wordplay. To illustrate the cognitive processes in meaning construction, the paper refers to the humorous language of Big Friendly Giant in Roald Dahl’s The BFG in its original English version as well as its translations into Polish and Portuguese.

References

Barsalou, L. W. 1987. The instability of graded structure. Implications for the nature of concepts In U. Neisser (ed.) Concepts and conceptual development. Ecological and intellectual factos in categorization (p. 101-140) Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Baughman, W. A. & Mmford, M. D. 1995. Process-analytic models of creative capacities: operations influencing the combination and reorganization processes Creativity Research Journal 8, 37-62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_4

Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551352
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551352

Coulson, S., Urbach, T., & Kutas, M. 2006. Looking back: Joke Comprehension and the Space Structuring Model. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 19, 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.013
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.013

Dahl, Roald. 1982/2007. The BFG, London: Puffin Books.
Google Scholar

Dahl, Roald. 1982/2003 .BFO trans. Jerzy Łoziński, Poznań: Zysk i S-KA Wydawnictwo.
Google Scholar

Dahl, Roald. 1982/2015. GGG O Grande Gigante Gentil, trad. Susana Ferreira e Bárbara Soares, Alfragide: Oficina do Livro – Sociedade Editorial, Lda.
Google Scholar

Dahl, Roald. 1982/2016. O Bom Gigante Amigo. trans. Angela Mariani. Edição comemorativa do centanário de Roald Dahl (1916-1990), São Paulo: Editora34.
Google Scholar

Evans, V., Green, M., 2006. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220

Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. 2003. Conceptual Blending, Form and Meaning Recherches en communication, nº 19.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.14428/rec.v19i19.48413

Finke, R. A. 1990. Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Finke, R. A. & Slayton, K. 1988. Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery. Memory and Cognition, 16, 252-257. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197758
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197758

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. 1992 /1996. Creative Cognition. Theory Research, and Applications, Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7722.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7722.001.0001

Gentner D. 1989 The mechanisms of analogical learning In Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (p. 199-241) Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.011
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.011

Hampton, J. A. 1997. Emergent attributes in combined concepts In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith & J. Vaid (eds.) Creative Thought. An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (p. 83-110) Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10227-004
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10227-004

Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. R. 1995. Mental Leaps. Cambridge, MA: the MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4549.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4549.001.0001

Klos, Sylwia. 2020. Humour and Translation in Children’s Literature. A Cognitive Approach, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Google Scholar

Mednick, S. A. 1962 The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850

Murphy, G. L. 1988. Comprehending complex concepts. Cognitive Science 12, 529-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90012-2
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90012-2

Novick, L. 1988. Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14, p. 510-520. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.510
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.510

Ortony, A. 1990. Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review 86, 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.86.3.161
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.86.3.161

Perkins, D. N. 1981. The Mind’s Best Work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042032
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042032

Shepard, R. N. 1978. Externalization of mental images and the act of creation In B. S. Randhawa and W. E. Coffman (eds.) Visual Learning, Thinking, and Communication (p. 133-189) New York: Academic
Google Scholar

Shepard, R. N. & Feng, C. 1972. A chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cognitive Psychology 3, 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90005-9
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90005-9

Smith, S. M. 1979. Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.5.5.460
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.5.5.460

Thomson, A. L., Klatzky, R. L, 1978. Studies of visual synthesis. Integration of fragments into forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.4.2.244
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.4.2.244

Ward, T. B. 1994. Structured imagination: the role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 244-263. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1010
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1010

Ward, T. B. 1995. What’s old about new ideas? In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward & R. A. Finke (eds.) The creative cognition approach (p. 157-178), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar