Linguistic functions and indirect speech acts in tobacco products health warnings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.22.3.03

Keywords:

tobacco health warnings, linguistic function, locution, speech act

Abstract

The study incorporates the theory of linguistic functions (Jakobson 1960) and speech act theory (Austin 1962) to analyse the differences and similarities of the language used to produce health warning signs on tobacco-related products in Polish and English. The analysis is based on the premise that labels have a primary force of being a warning, when their social function is in focus. The texts proposed as health warnings are highly formulaic and despite the fact that they address a variety of issues, they seem to be inherently similar in form. This pilot study aims to analyse corpora of selected Polish and English health warnings in order to assess the level of their linguistic similarity.

Author Biography

Julia Koszmider, University of Lodz

Julia Koszmider is a graduate of English Philology (BA and MA) at the University of Lodz and at present a PhD candidate there. Her main interests are in social semiotics and sociopragmatics.

References

Austin, J. L. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Chovanec, J. (2007) ‘The same though different: tobacco health warnings in European community member states’ in K. Kredens and S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (eds.) Language and the Law: International Outlooks, Peter Lang: Frankfurt-am-Main.
Google Scholar

Hammond, D., Fong, G.T., McNeill, A., Borland, R., Cummings, K.M. (2006) Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. BMJ Publishing Group
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.012294

Jakobson, R. (1960) ‘Linguistics and Poetics’ in Burke, L. Crowley, T. Girvin, A. (eds.) The Routledge Language and Cultural Theory Reader (2000). Psychology Press; pp. 334-339.
Google Scholar

Kohli, C., Leuthesser, L., Suri, R. (2007). ‘Got slogan? Guidelines for creating effective slogans’. Business Horizons.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.05.002

Mahood, G. (2003) ‘Canada's Tobacco Package Label or Warning System: "Telling the Truth" about Tobacco Product Risks’. UCSF: Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education.
Google Scholar

Tiersma, P.M. (2002) ‘The Language and Law of Product Warnings’. In Cotterill, J. (ed.) Language in the Legal Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_4

Vanderveken, D. (1990) ‘Meaning and Speech Acts’. Principles of Language Use. Volume 1. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Online source 1 : Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of cigarette packaging (accessed 10-01-2024) https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-tobacco-control-warnings-cigarettes-w2-pc-front-back-a
Google Scholar

Online source 2: Health warnings on cigarette packaging must include a photograph or graphic https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-tobacco-control-warnings-cigarettes-w10-graphic-a (accessed 10-01-2024)
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Koszmider, J. (2024). Linguistic functions and indirect speech acts in tobacco products health warnings. Research in Language, 22(3), 212–249. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.22.3.03

Issue

Section

Articles