The Bored Cossack: The Way of a Ukrainian Warrior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/3071-7779.2025.2.02Słowa kluczowe:
Cossack Mamai, boredom, Ukrainian folk art, social anthropology, Early Modern period, military cultureAbstrakt
The article examines Ukrainian folk paintings of Cossack Mamai as the most complete visual archetype of the Cossack, a professional warrior of the Early Modern period. It argues that Mamai’s static posture and melancholic expression should not be interpreted solely as reflection or sadness, but primarily as a state of boredom, understood in the philosophical sense developed by Martin Heidegger. This boredom emerges from the Cossack’s relationship with time, the steppe landscape, and a psychotype shaped by warfare, isolation, and environmental monotony. An iconographic analysis of key elements (the tree, horse, weapons, bandura, and utensils) shows Mamai as a wealthy, mobile warrior immobilised by enforced rest. The figure is interpreted as one of existential suspension: bored, waiting, aware of purpose yet unable to realise it. In this reading, Mamai becomes a symbol of Ukrainian mentality and of a long-term historical search for identity and meaning.
Bibliografia
Alexander R.D. 1987. The Biology of Moral Systems. New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Biletskyi P. 1997. Narodni kartyny Kozaky Mamai. “Rodovid” 16, 28–35.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Boredom. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boredom. Available online: 5 August 2018.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Brekhunenko V. 2011. Kozaky na stepovomu kordoni Yevropy: typolohiia kozatskykh spilnot XVI – pershoi polovyny XVII st. Kyiv.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Bushak S. 2008. Kozak Mamai: fenomen odnoho obrazu ta sproba prochytannia yoho kulturnoho “identyfikatsiinoho” kodu. In: Kozak Mamai: Album. Kyiv, 8–119.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Butnyk-Siverskyi B. 1967. Ukraïnske narodne mystetstvo: zhyvopys. Kyiv.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Cáceres J.A.E. 2020. The Art of Boring (Oneself). In: R.J. Velasco (ed.), The Culture of Boredom, 217–235.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Choi J.-K., Bowles S. 2007. The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. “Science” 318, 636–640.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Chukhlib T. 2003. Pereiaslavska uhoda 1654 r. u konteksti mizhnarodnoho utverdzhennia rannomodernoi ukrainskoi derzhavy. “Ukrainskyi Istorychnyi Zhurnal” 3, 47–58.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Čyževskyj D. 1931. Zur Charakterologie der Ukrainer. “Slavische Rundschau” 3, 237–244.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Fehr E., Bernhard H., Rockenbach B. 2008. Egalitarianism in Your Children. “Nature” 454, 1079–1083.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Fenichel O. 1951. On the psychology of boredom. In: D. Rapaport (ed.), Organization and Pathology of Thought. New York, 349–361.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Goldberg Y.K. et al. 2011. Boredom: An Emotional Experience Distinct from Apathy, Anhedonia, or Depression. “Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology” 30, 647–648. https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.6.647. Available online:
Zobacz w Google Scholar
12 June 2022.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Halenko O. 2009. Kozak Mamai: fenomen odnoho obrazu ta sproba prochytannia yoho kulturnoho “identyfikatsiinoho” kodu. “Studii Mystetstvoznavchi” 1, 151–158.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Heidegger M. 1995. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Bloomington–Indianapolis.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Hodenko-Nakonechna O. 2010. Mamai-fest u Kamianskom. “Artaniia” 4, 90–94.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Kingwell M. 2019. Wish I Were Here: Boredom and the Interface. Montreal–Kingston–London–Chicago.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
“Langeweile”. Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/german-english/langeweile. Available online: 12 June 2022.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Laska I.M. 2007. ‘Kozak Mamai,’ ‘kozak banduryst’. In: V.A. Smolij (ed.), Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy, 4. Kyiv, 405.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Marchenko-Poshyvailo T. 1999. Narodna kartyna Kozak-Mamai, yak polisemantychne uosoblennia svitohliadu ukraintsiv. “Artaniia” 5, 34–39.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Markov A. Evoliutsiia kooperatsii i altruizma: ot bakterii do cheloveka.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
https://bio.wikireading.ru/3662. Available online: 12 June 2022.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Mills C.W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Molyn N. 2017. Narodna kartyna “Kozak Mamai” yak dzherelo tvorchosti suchasnykh khudozhnykiv. “Visnyk Lvivskoi Natsionalnoi Akademii Mystetstv” 33, 123–132.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Nuda jest nam bardzo potrzebna. “Gość Niedzielny”. https://www.gosc.pl/doc/4916254.Nuda-jest-nam-bardzo-potrzebna. Available online: 5 August 2018.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
“Nudʹha”. 1974. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy, 5. Kyiv, 452.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Rybchyn I. 1970. Dynamika ukrainskoho kozatstva. Munich.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Shashkevych A. 1888. ‘There, where the Yatrahn’ is wreathing steeply. Transl. I. Petryshyn. 24 November 2019. https://lyricstranslate.com/en/там-де-ятрань-круто-в’ється-there-where-yatrahn’-wreathing-steeply”.html
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Slavutych Y. 2012. Viiskovyi kostium v ukrainskii kozatskii derzhavi. Kyiv.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Toichkin D. 2013. Klynkova zbroia kozatskoi starshyny XVI – pershoi polovyny XVII st.: problemy atrybutsiyi ta klasyfikatsiyi. Kyiv.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Trivers R.L. 1971. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. “The Quarterly Review of Biology” 46, 35–57.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
van Tilburg W.A.P., Igou E.R. 2019. The Unbearable Lightness of Boredom: A Pragmatic Meaning-Regulation Hypothesis. In: R.J. Velasco (ed.), Boredom Is in Your Mind: A Shared Psychological-Philosophical Approach. Cham, 11–35.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Zholtovskyi P. 1978. Ukrainskyi zhyvopys XVII–XVIII st. Kyiv.
Zobacz w Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
