Colonization of decomposing Sphagnum moss litter by mycorrhizal roots in two types of peatland ecosystems

Authors

  • Mateusz Wilk University of Warsaw, Inter-Faculty Interdisciplinary Doctoral Studies in Natural Sciences and Mathematics; University of Warsaw, Faculty of Biology, Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Protection
  • Julia Pawłowska University of Warsaw, Faculty of Biology, Department of Systematics and Plant Geography
  • Marta Wrzosek University of Warsaw, Faculty of Biology, Department of Systematics and Plant Geography
  • Michał Gorczak University of Warsaw, Faculty of Biology, Department of Systematics and Plant Geography
  • Małgorzata Suska-Malawska University of Warsaw, Faculty of Biology, Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Protection

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/fobio-2014-0009

Keywords:

peatlands, Sphagnum decomposition, roots, mycorrhizal colonization, mycorrhizae

Abstract

During a 35-month study on the decomposition of Sphagnum moss litter in poor fen and pine bog forest, an intensive colonization of litter-bags by mycorrhizal roots was observed during the decomposition process. Content of mycorrhizal roots in litter-bags, expressed as % mass of roots, was generally increasing during the decomposition in pine bog forest, and fluctuating during decomposition on poor fen, although in both cases the results were statistically insignificant. Two morphotypes of ericoid roots and two morphotypes of ectomycorrhizal roots were recorded from litter-bags on poor fen during the decomposition experiment, while in pine bog forest one morphotype of ericoid and nine morphotypes of ectomycorrhizal roots were recorded. Molecular identification of mycorrhizal roots succeeded only in the case of one ericoid and six putatively ectomycorrhizal morphotypes. Most morphotypes were recorded only once during the whole 35-month decomposition period, and only one ericoid and one ectomycorrhizal morphotypes were shared between the poor fen and pine bog forest communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aučina, A., Rudawska, M., Leski T., Ryliškis, D., Pietras, M. & Riepšas, E. 2011. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities on seedlings and conspecific trees of Pinus mugo grown on the coastal dunes of the Curonian Spit in Lithuania. Mycorrhiza, 21: 237–245.
Google Scholar

Budziszewska, J., Szypuła, W., Wilk, M. & Wrzosek, M. 2011. Paraconiothyrium babiogorense sp. nov., a new endophyte from fir club moss Huperzia selago (Huperziaceae). Mycotaxon, 115: 457–468.
Google Scholar

Chalot, M. & Brun, A. 1998. Physiology of organic nitrogen acquisition by ectomycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizas. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 22: 21–44.
Google Scholar

Conn, C. & Dighton, J. 2000. Litter quality influences on decomposition, ectomycorrhizal community structure and mycorrhizal root surface acid phosphatase activity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32: 489–496.
Google Scholar

Deckmyn, G., Meyer, A., Smits, M.M., Ekblad, A., Grebenc, T., Komarov, A. & Kraigher, H. 2014. Simulating ectomycorrhizal fungi and their role in carbon and nitrogen cycling in forest ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44: 535–553.
Google Scholar

Kõljalg, U., Nilsson, R.H., Abarenkov, K., Tedersoo, L., Taylor, A.F.S., Bahram, M., Bates, S.T., Bruns, T.D., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Callaghan, T.M., Douglas, B., Drenkhan, T., Eberhardt, U., Dueñas, M., Grebenc, T., Griffith, G.W., Hartmann, M., Kirk, P.M., Kohout, P., Larsson, E., Lindahl, B.D., Lücking, R., Martín, M.P., Matheny, P.B., Nguyen, N.H., Niskanen, T., Oja, J., Peay, K.G., Peintner, U., Peterson, M., Põldmaa, K., Saag, L., Saar, I., Schüßler, A., Scott, J.A., Senés, C., Smith, M.E., Suija, A., Taylor, D.L., Telleria, M.T., Weiß, M. & Larsson, K-H. 2013. Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Molecular Ecology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.12481
Google Scholar

Read, D.J., Leake, J.R. & Perez-Moreno, J. 2004. Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers of ecosystem processes in heathland and boreal forest biomes. Canadian Journal of Botany, 82: 1243–1263.
Google Scholar

Schoch, C.L., Seifert, K.A., Huhndorf, S., Robert, V., Spouge, J.L., Levesque, C.A. & Chen, W. Fungal Barcoding Consortium 2012. The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109: 6241–6246.
Google Scholar

Selosse, M.A., Dubois, M.P. & Alvarez, N. 2009. Do Sebacinales commonly associate with plant roots as endophytes? Mycological Research 113: 1062–1069.
Google Scholar

Selosse, M.A., Setaro, S., Glatard, F., Richard, F., Urcelay, C., Weiß, M. 2007. Sebacinales are common mycorrhizal associates of Ericaceae. New Phytologist, 174: 864–878.
Google Scholar

Smith, S.E. & Read, D.J. 2008. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Third Edition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Google Scholar

Summerbell, R.C. 2005. Root endophyte and mycorrhizosphere fungi of black spruce, Picea mariana, in a boreal forest habitat: influence of site factors on fungal distributions. Studies in Mycology, 53: 121–145.
Google Scholar

Talbot, J.M., Allison, S.D. & Treseder, K.K. 2008. Decomposers in disguise: mycorrhizal fungi as regulators of soil C dynamics in ecosystems under global change. Functional Ecology, 22: 955–963.
Google Scholar

Thormann, M.N. 2006. The role of fungi in boreal peatlands. In: Wieder R.K., Vitt D.H. (eds), Boreal Peatland Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 188, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 101–123.
Google Scholar

Thormann, M.N., Currah, R.S. & Bayley, S.E. 1999. The mycorrhizal status of the dominant vegetation along a peatland gradient in southern boreal Alberta, Canada. Wetlands, 19: 438–450.
Google Scholar

Unestam, T. 1991. Water repellency, mat formation and leaf-stimulated growth of some ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza, 1: 13–20.
Google Scholar

UNITE database http://unite.ut.ee/
Google Scholar

Weiß, M., Selosse, M.A., Rexer, K.H., Urban, A. & Oberwinkler, F. 2004. Sebacinales: a hitherto overlooked cosm of heterobasidiomycetes with broad mycorrhizal potential. Mycological Research, 108(9): 1003–1010.
Google Scholar

Weiß, M., Sýkorová, Z., Garnica, S., Riess, K., Martos, F., Krause, C., Oberwinkler, F., Bauer, R. & Redecker, D. 2011. Sebacinales Everywhere: previously overlooked Ubiquitous fungal endophytes. PLoSONE 6(2):e16793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016793
Google Scholar

White, T.J., Bruns, T.D., Lee, S. & Taylor, J.W. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., White T.J. (eds), PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, NewYork, pp. 315–322.
Google Scholar

Zhu, W. & Ehrenfeld, J.G. 1996. The effects of mycorrhizal roots on litter decomposition, soil biota, and nutrients in a spodosolic soil. Plant and Soil, 179: 109–118.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2014-11-30

How to Cite

Wilk, M., Pawłowska, J., Wrzosek, M., Gorczak, M., & Suska-Malawska, M. (2014). Colonization of decomposing Sphagnum moss litter by mycorrhizal roots in two types of peatland ecosystems. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Biologica Et Oecologica, 10, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.2478/fobio-2014-0009