Plants on duty – phytotechnologies and phytoremediation at a glance

Zuzanna Oleksińska

doi:10.1515/fobio-2015-0004

Authors

Zuzanna Oleksińska University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Applied Ecology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/fobio-2015-0004

Keywords:

ecotechnologies, rehabilitation, remediation, watershed management, pollution control

Abstract

Phytotechnologies are plant based technologies of remediation and containment of pollutions. Many advantages of phytotechnologies such as control of water and biogeochemical cycles, positive impact on soil characteristics and lowering the risk of erosion, contaminant immobilization and destruction, habitat restoration, low costs of implementation, and high public acceptance, decide that in more and more cases it is a preferred and recommended method of rehabilitation. Vegetation selected to the particular site conditions and having required characteristics will shape other biotic communities. It is thus immensely important to gather detailed knowledge about all the elements and processes occurring at the place of interest, before employing adequate phytotechnology application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assessment, M.E. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Island Press Washington, DC.
Google Scholar

Budyko, M.I. 1986. Plants. In: The Evolution of the Biosphere (M.I. Budyko, ed.), pp. 99–137. Springer Netherlands, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar

Costanzo, A. & Bàrberi, P. 2014. Functional agrobiodiversity and agroecosystem services in sustainable wheat production. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(2): 327–348.
Google Scholar

Danilov-Danil'yan, V.I., Losev, K.S. & Reyf I.E. 2009. In: Sustainable development in relation to the carrying capacity of the biosphere. Sustainable Development and the Limitation of Growth (V.I. Danilov-Danil'yan, K.S. Losev, & Reyf I.E. eds), pp. 187–196. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Google Scholar

DuBowy, P.J. 2013. Mississippi River Ecohydrology: Past, present and future. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 13(1): 73–83.
Google Scholar

Ehret, M., Bühle, L., Graß, R., Lamersdorf, N. & Wachendorf, M. 2015. Bioenergy provision by an alley cropping system of grassland and shrub willow hybrids: biomass, fuel characteristics and net energy yields. Agroforestry Systems, 89(2): 365–381.
Google Scholar

Grayson, J., Chapman, M. & Underwood, A. 1999. The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands. Landscape and Urban planning, 43(4): 227–236.
Google Scholar

IETC U. 2003. Phytotechnologies: A Technical Approach in Environmental Management. UNEP, Web.
Google Scholar

Kirkby, M. 1995. Modelling the links between vegetation and landforms. Geomorphology, 13(1–4): 319–335.
Google Scholar

Marmiroli, N., Marmiroli, M. & Maestri, E. 2006. Phytoremediation and phytotechnologies: A review for the present and the future. In:. Soil and Water Pollution Monitoring, Protection and Remediation (Twardowska, I., Allen, H., Häggblom, M. & Stefaniak, S., eds), pp. 403–416. Springer Netherlands, Amsterdam.
Google Scholar

Philippot, L. Raaijmakers, J.M., Lemanceau, P. & van der Putten, W.H. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 11(11): 789–799.
Google Scholar

Ryszkowski, L. 1998. Nature friendly farming. Naturopa 86: 9.
Google Scholar

Sinden, J.A. & King, D. 1996. Conservation information: a market incentive to promote environmental quality. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5(7): 943–950.
Google Scholar

Technology I, Team RCP. 2009. Phytotechnology Technical and Regulatory Guidance and Decision Trees, Revised: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.
Google Scholar

Thangavel, P. & Sridevi, G. 2014. Environmental Sustainability: Role of Green Technologies: Springer, New Delhi.
Google Scholar

van Beukering, P.J.H., Cesar, H.S.J. & Janssen M.A. 2003. Economic valuation of the Leuser National Park on Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 44(1): 43–62.
Google Scholar

Vaněk, T., Podlipna, R. & Soudek, P. 2010. General Factors Influencing Application of Phytotechnology Techniques. In: Application of Phytotechnologies for Cleanup of Industrial, Agricultural, and Wastewater Contamination (Kulakow, P. & Pidlisnyuk, V., editors), pp. 1–13. Springer Netherlands.
Google Scholar

Whetton, P.H., Fowler, A.M., Haylock & M.R., Pittock, A.B. 1993. Implications of climate change due to the enhanced greenhouse effect on floods and droughts in Australia. Climatic Change, 25(3–4): 289–317.
Google Scholar

Zalewski, M. 2002. Guidelines for the integrated management of the watershed: phytotechnology and ecohydrology: UNEP/Earthprint.
Google Scholar

Zalewski, M. 2011. Ecohydrology for implementation of the EU water framework directive. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management, 164(8): 375–385.
Google Scholar

Zalewski, M & Wagner-Lotkowska, I. 2004. Integrated watershed mangement: ecohydrology & phytotechnology. Manual. Integrated watershed mangement: ecohydrology & phytotechnology Manual: UNESCO.
Google Scholar