Specialized Knowledge Representation: from Terms to Frames
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.17.2.06Keywords:
context expansion, frame, multi-word term, phrase, specialized discourseAbstract
Understanding specialized discourse requires the identification and activation of knowledge structures underlying the text. The expansion and enhancement of knowledge is thus an important part of the specialized translation process (Faber 2015). This paper explores how the analysis of terminological meaning can be addressed from the perspective of Frame-Based Terminology (FBT) (Faber 2012, 2015), a cognitive approach to domain-specific language, which directly links specialized knowledge representation to cognitive linguistics and cognitive semantics. In this study, context expansion was explored in a three-stage procedure: from single terms to multi-word terms, from multi-word terms to phrases, and from phrases to frames. Our results showed that this approach provides valuable insights into the identification of the knowledge structures underlying specialized texts.
References
Anderson, John R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Binder, Jeffrey R. and Rutvik H. Desai. 2011. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (11). 527-536. [Online]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3350748/ [Accessed: 22 April 2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001
Buendía Castro, Miriam. 2013. Phraseology in Specialized Language and its Representation in Environmental Knowledge Resources. PhD Thesis. Granada: University of Granada.
Google Scholar
Buendía Castro, Miriam and Pamela Faber. 2016. Phraseological Correspondence in English and Spanish Specialized Texts. In Gloria Corpas Pastor (ed.), Computerised and Corpus-based Approaches to Phraseology: Monolingual and Multilingual Perspectives = Fraseología computacional y basada en corpus: perspectivas monolingües y multilingües, 391-398. Geneva: Tradulex.
Google Scholar
Busse, Dietrich. 2012. Frame-Semantik: Ein Kompendium. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110269451
Cabezas-García, Melania and Pamela Faber. In press. Phraseology in specialized resources: An approach to complex nominals. Lexicograpy.
Google Scholar
Cabezas-García, Melania and Pilar León-Araúz. 2018. Towards the Inference of Semantic Relations in Complex Nominals: a Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), 2511-2518. Miyazaki: ELRA.
Google Scholar
Daille, Béatrice. 2017. Term Variation in Specialized Corpora: Characterisation, automatic discovery and applications. Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, vol. 19. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.19
Dubuc, Robert and Andy Lauriston. 1997. Terms and contexts. In Sue Ellen Wright and Gerhard Budin (eds.), Handbook of Terminology Management: Basic Aspects of Terminology Management, vol. 1, 80-87. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.11dub
Faber, Pamela. (ed.) 2012. A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110277203
Faber, Pamela. 2015. Frames as a framework for terminology. In Hendrik J. Kockaert and Frieda Steurs (eds.), Handbook of Terminology, vol. 1, 14-33. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hot.1.02fra1
Faber, Pamela and Pilar León-Araúz. 2016. Specialized knowledge representation and the parameterization of context. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (196). 1-20. [Online] Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00196/full [Accessed: 19 April 2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00196
Faber, Pamela and Ricardo Mairal Usón. 1999. Constructing a Lexicon of English Verbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800623
Faber, Pamela, et al. 2014. Neural Substrates of Specialized Knowledge Representation: An fMRI study. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 19 (1). 15-32. [Online] Available from: https://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-linguistique-appliquee-2014-1-page-15.htm [Accessed: 20 April 2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.191.0015
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2016. A morphosemantic investigation of term formation processes in English and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 16 (1). 54-83.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16.1.03fer
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111-137. Seoul: Hanshin.
Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6 (2). 222-254.
Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 2006. Frame Semantics. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics. Basic readings, 373-400. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373
Fillmore, Charles J., Johnson, Christopher R. and Miriam R. L. Petruck. 2003. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16 (3). 235-250.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.235
Gallese, Vittorio and George Lakoff. 2005. The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3-4). 455-479.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310
Gildea, Daniel and Daniel Jurafsky. 2002. Automatic Labeling of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 28 (3). 245-288. [Online] Available from: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=643093 [Accessed: 22 April 2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102760275983
Kecskes, Istvan. 2014. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001
Kiefer, Markus and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2012. Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 48 (7). 805-825.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
Kilgarriff, Adam et al. 2014. The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography 1 (1). 7-36.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
Levi, Judith. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 2013. Argument Structure. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
L’Homme, Marie-Claude. 1998. Le statut du verbe en langue de spécialité et sa description lexicographique. Cahiers de lexicologie 73 (2). 61-84.
Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic semantics: an introduction. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810213
Maniez, François. 2009. L’adjectif dénominal en langue de spécialité: étude du domaine de la médecine. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 14 (2). 117-130. [Online] Available from: https://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-linguistique-appliquee-2009-2-page-117.htm [Accessed: 19 April 2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.142.0117
Meteyard, Lotte et al. 2012. Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex 48 (7). 788-804.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
Minsky, Marvin. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In Patrick H. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, 211-277. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Nakov, Preslav. 2013. On the interpretation of noun compounds: Syntax, semantics, and entailment. Natural Language Engineering 19 (3). 291-330. [Online] Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/08af/6f1481ca99a07f01b5dfde042ea00d1bf8b5.pdf [Accessed: 20 April 2018].
Google Scholar
Palmer, Martha, Gildea, Daniel and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles. Computational Linguistics 31 (1). 71-106. [Online] Available from: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1122628 [Accessed: 20 April 2018].
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0891201053630264
Patterson, Karalyn, Nestor, Peter J. and Timothy T. Rogers. 2007. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8. 976-987.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2277
Quillian, Ross. 1969. The teachable language comprehender. Communications of the ACM 12 (8). 459-476.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/363196.363214
Sager, Juan C., Dungworth, David and Peter F. McDonald. 1980. English Special Languages. Principles and Practice in Science and Technology. Wiesbaden: Brandstetter Verlag.
Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol, Valera, Salvador and Lívia Körtvélyessy. 2012. Word-formation in the world’s languages: a typological survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2013-0022
Temmerman, Rita. 2013. Primary and secondary term creation and the process of understanding. Presentation given at the international seminar Application of Cognitive Terminology Theories in Terminology Management, Zagreb, 27-28 September 2013. [Online]. Available at: http://struna.ihjj.hr/uploads/actt/Temmerman_Zagreb_2013.pdf [Accessed: 17 April 2018].
Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. and Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
