Optimality Theoretic Analysis of Non-Rhoticity in English

Authors

  • Przemysław Ostalski University of Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-007-0004-4

Keywords:

Phonology, Optimality Theory, Rhoticity, Accents of English, Hiatus

Abstract

The paper intends to describe various rhotic phenomena within a unified phonological framework of Optimality Theory. This description encompasses “standard” rhotic phenomena, such as linking and intrusive r. Additionally both hyper- and hypo-rhoticity are discussed. The paper serves primarily two points. First, it proves practical workability of constraint mechanism, as proposed by Optimality Theory. Second, it presents an integrated account of seemingly unrelated phonological facts observed in various accents of English. The paper discusses also previous accounts of rhoticity in English in connection with an attempt of presenting solid evidence for the choice of underlying forms. Furthermore two competing theoretical descriptions of rhotic insertions (epenthesis vs. gliding/spreading) are compared and evaluated. Finally, the spreading account is shown to be formally superior to the anti-hiatus approach. Moreover, the paper demonstrates a way in which r-liaison might be incorporated in the synchronic grammar of non-rhotic accents. Simply put, r-liaison could be perceived as another instantiation of VSPREAD conspiracy, where vowels tend to spread their melodic content onto the following segments. The OT machinery was also employed to account for the differences between various subtypes of non-rhotic accents, in terms of re-ranking of several constraints. The peculiar phenomena of hyper-rhoticity have, too, been demonstrated to fit the proposal.

References

ROA = Rutgers Optimality Archive http://roa.rutgers.edu/index.php3
Google Scholar

Baković, E. 1999. Deletion, insertion and symmetrical identity. ROA–300.
Google Scholar

Broadbent, J. 1991. “Linking and intrusive r in English”. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 281–302.
Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. 1988. A practical introduction to phonetics. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. 1994. Gimson’s pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.
Google Scholar

Gick, B. 1999. “A gesture-based account of intrusive consonants in English”. Phonology 16.1: 29–54.
Google Scholar

Gick, B. 2002. “American intrusive L.” American Speech 77.2: 167–183.
Google Scholar

Gimson, A. C. 1980. An introduction to the pronunciation of English. third edn. London: Edward Arnold.
Google Scholar

Halle, M. and Idsardi, W. J. 1997. “r, hypercorrection and the elsewhere condition”. In: RocaI. M. (ed.). Derivations and constraints in phonology Oxford: Clarendon, 331–48.
Google Scholar

Harris, J. 1994. English sound structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Hughes, A. and Trudgill, P. 1996. English accents and dialects. London: Edward Arnold.
Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig, Berlin: Teubner.
Google Scholar

Kager, R. 1999. Optimality Theory: a textbook. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Google Scholar

Kenyon, J. S. 1958. American pronunciation. Ann Arbor, Mich.: George Wahr.
Google Scholar

Labov, W. 1992. Principles of linguistic change. Washington, DC: Center for Applied linguistics.
Google Scholar

Laver, J. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Google Scholar

Mc Carthy, J. J. 1991. “Synchronic rule inversion”. In: Sutton, L. A., Johnson, C. and Shields, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 192–207.
Google Scholar

Mc Carthy, J. J. 1993. “A case of surface constraint violation”. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38: 169–95.
Google Scholar

Mc Carthy, J. and Prince, A. [S.] 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In: Jill Beckam, Laura Walsh Dickey, & Susan Urbańczyk (eds). Papers in Optimality Theory University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18; Amherst, Mass.: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts, 249–384. ROA–60–0000.
Google Scholar

Mc Mahon, April 1996. “On the use of the past to explain the present: the history of /r/ in English and Scots”. In: Britton D. (ed.), English Historical Linguistics 1994 Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–89.
Google Scholar

Ostalski, P. 2004. Constraints in Optimality Theory. A case study of rhoticity phenomena in English, unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Łódź.
Google Scholar

Prince, A. [S.] and Smolensky, P. 1993. “Optimality Theory Rutgers University”. Technical report RuCCS TR–2.
Google Scholar

Pullum, G. 1976. “The Duke of York gambit”. Journal of Linguistics 12: 83–102.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. 2000. “Glide and glottal stop insertion in Slavic languages: A DOT analysis”. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 271–317.
Google Scholar

Sanders, N. 2002. Preserving synchronic parallelism: Diachrony and opacity in Polish. In” Andronis, M., Ball, C., Elston, H. and Neuvel, S. (eds), CLS: The Main Session. Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, vol. 1. Chicago Linguistics Society, 501–516.
Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. and Hannah, J. 1994. International English. London: Edward Arnold.
Google Scholar

Uffmann, C. 2002. R-intrusion as a natural process. Ms. Universität Marburg.
Google Scholar

Urbańczyk, S. 1984. Zarys dialektologii polskiej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. 1991. Longman pronunciation dictionary. Burnt Mill, Harlow, Essex: Longman House.
Google Scholar

Wierzchowska, B. 1980. Fonetyka i fonologia języka polskiego. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2007-12-18

How to Cite

Ostalski, P. (2007). Optimality Theoretic Analysis of Non-Rhoticity in English . Research in Language, 5, 109–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-007-0004-4

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)