The Past Perfect in Corpora and EFL/ESL Materials

Tim Vandenhoek

doi:10.2478/rela-2018-0005

Authors

Tim Vandenhoek Asia University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2018-0005

Keywords:

corpus, ESL, EFL, materials, past, perfect

Abstract

Corpora provide teachers and materials developers with the ability to ensure that the instructions they use in class and in teaching materials correctly reflect natural use. This paper examines the ways in which grammar reference books and two types of EFL/ESL materials present the past perfect aspect and whether they do so accurately. It will be argued that there are several issues concerning how these books present the grammar point. Many of the books surveyed provide incomplete explanations of when and how the form is used and several contain usage guidelines that are not supported by available corpus data. The paper ends with several recommendations to improve how the form is presented to teachers and learners.

References

Alexander, Louis G. 1988. Longman English Grammar. Essex: Longman.
Google Scholar

Azar, Betty and Stacey Hagen. 2009. Understanding and Using English Grammar. 4th edn. New York: Pearson.
Google Scholar

BBC NEWS. 2011. Ai Weiwei China tax bill paid by supporters. [Online] Available from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-15616576 [Accessed November 2011].
Google Scholar

Barbieri, Federica and Suzanne E. B. Eckhardt. 2007. Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech. Language Teaching Research 11 (3). 319-346.
Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Susan. Conrad. 2001. Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly 35 (2). 331-336.
Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Randi Reppen. 2002. What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2). 199-208.
Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas et al. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Cecle-Murcia, Marianne. 1998. How discourse helps us understand grammar more fully: The past perfect. MEXTESOL Journal 22 (2). 11-16.
Google Scholar

Cecle-Murcia, Marianne and Diana Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book. 2nd edn. Heinle & Heinle.
Google Scholar

Conrad, Susan. 2000. Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century?
Google Scholar

TESOL Quarterly 34 (3). 548-560.
Google Scholar

Cunningham, Sarah, Moor, Peter and Jonathan Bygrave. 2013. Cutting Edge Intermediate. 3rd edn. Harlow: Pearson.
Google Scholar

Cunningham, Sarah, Moor, Peter and Araminta Crace. 2013. Cutting Edge Pre-Intermediate 3rd edn. Harlow: Pearson.
Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC. [Online] Available from http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/ [Accessed February 2016].
Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English. [Online] Available from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ [Accessed February 2016].
Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2011. The Google Books (American English) Corpus. [Online] Available from http://googlebooks.byu.edu/ [Accessed February 2016].
Google Scholar

DeLillo, Don. 2008. Falling Man. London: Pan Macmillan Ltd.
Google Scholar

Downing, Angela and Philip Locke 1992. A University Course in English Grammar. Hemel Hampstead: Prentice Hill International.
Google Scholar

Gibson, William. 2003. Pattern Recognition. New York: Berkley.
Google Scholar

Hughes, Rebecca and Michael McCarthy. 1998. From Sentence to Discourse: Discourse Grammar and English Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly 32 (2).
Google Scholar

Jackson, Howard. 1990. Grammar and Meaning. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Liu, Dilin and Ping Jiang. 2009. Using a Corpus‐Based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL contexts. The Modern Language Journal 93 (1). 61-78.
Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael, McCarten, Jeanne and Helen Sandiford. 2006. Touchstone 4. Cambridge: Cambridge, University Press.
Google Scholar

Mieville, China. 2002. The Scar. [Online] New York: Tor. Available from www.amazon.co.jp. [Accessed 2nd January 2017].
Google Scholar

Murphy, Raymond and William Smalzer. 2009. English Grammar in Use Intermediate (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Parrot, Martin. 2000. Grammar for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (Revised). Essex: Longman Group UK Ltd.
Google Scholar

Richards, Jack. C. and David Bohlke. 2012. Four Corners 4 Student’s Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. (ed). 2005. Collins Cobuild English Grammar. 2nd edn. Glasgow: HarperCollins. Soars, Liz and John Soars. 2009. New Headway Intermediate. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Soars, Liz and John Soars. 2012. New Headway Pre-Intermediate. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Swan, Michael. 2005. Practical English Usage. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Thompson, Hunter S. 1970. The Kentucky Derby is Decadent and Depraved. Available from http://www.kentuckyderby.info/kentuckyderby-party.php [Accessed 7th November 2011].
Google Scholar

Wecker, Helene. 2013. The Golem and the Jinni [Online] New York: HarperCollins. Available from www.play.google.com. [Accessed 2nd January 2017].
Google Scholar

Willis, Dave. 2004. Collins Cobuild Intermediate English Grammar. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
Google Scholar

Willis, Dave and Jon Wright. 2003. Collins Cobuild Elementary English Grammar. 2nd edn. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
Google Scholar