Exploring into Graduate Research Term Papers: a Quest for Generic Disciplinary Tendencies

Parviz Ahmadi Darani; Mohamad Hassan Tahririan; Akbar Afghary

doi:10.2478/rela-2018-0007

Authors

Parviz Ahmadi Darani University of Sheikhbahaee
Mohamad Hassan Tahririan University of Sheikhbahaee
Akbar Afghary University of Sheikhbahaee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2018-0007

Keywords:

academic literacies, generic tendencies, research term paper

Abstract

The purpose of this exploratory analysis was to capture students’ generic tendencies in the organization of original research term papers written by graduate within the same linguistic, cultural, and disciplinary territory. A model proposed by Sheldon (2011) was benchmarked against a corpus of 60 English research term paper introductions to identify the saliency of move schemes along with step and sub-step realizations. At step-level analysis, the proportion of the various steps within Move 2 (indicating a gap, adding to what is known, and presenting positive justification) exhibited a pervasive lack of rhetorical tendency that contradicted the previous genre-based findings. Such an exploration, offers implications for English for research publication purposes instruction and academic literacies based on academic conventions and norms.

References

Ahmad, Ummul. 1997. Research Articles in Malay: Rhetoric in an Emerging Research Community. In Anna Duszak (ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, 275–303. Austin: De Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Arvay, Anett and Gyula Tanko. 2004. Contrastive Analysis of English and Hungarian Theoretical Research Article Introductions. IRAL 42. 71–100.
Google Scholar

Atai, Mohammadreza and Pyman Habibie. 2009. Exploring Subdisciplinary Variations and Generic Structure of Applied Linguistics Research Article Introductions Using CARS Model. The Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(2). 26–51.
Google Scholar

Bartlett, James, Kotrlik, Joe, and Chadwick Higgins. 2001. Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 19 (1). 43– 50.
Google Scholar

Basturkmen, Helen. 2012. Genre-Based Investigation of Discussion Sections of Research Articles in Dentistry and Disciplinary Variation. English for Academic Purposes 11(2). 134–144.
Google Scholar

Brent, Douglass. 2013. The Research Paper: Why We Should Still Care! Journal of the Council of WPA: Writing Program Administration 37(1).1–24.
Google Scholar

Bunton, David. 2002. Generic Moves in Ph.D. Thesis Introductions. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse, 57–75. London: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar

Burgess, Sally. 2002. Packed Houses and Intimate Gatherings: Audience and Rhetorical Structure. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic Discourse, 196–215. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Cohen, Louis, Manion, Lawrence and Keith Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Cooper, Amy and Dawn Bikowski. 2007. Writing at the Graduate Level: What Tasks do Professors Actually Require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(3). 206–221.
Google Scholar

Cotos, Elena, Huffman, Sarah and Stephanie Link. 2015. Furthering and Applying Move/ Step Constructs Technology-Driven Marshalling of Swalesian Genre Theory for EAP Pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19. 52–72.
Google Scholar

Fallahi, Mohammad and Ali Mobasher. 2007. Genre Analysis of Introduction Section of English and Persian Articles in Mechanics. Journal of Teaching English Language and Literature 1(2). 59–74.
Google Scholar

Fakhri, Ahmed. 2004. Rhetorical Properties of Arabic Research Article Introductions. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 1119–1138.
Google Scholar

Fredrickson, Kirstin and John Swales. 1994. Competition and Discourse Community: Introductions from Nysvenska Studies. In Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Per Linell and Bengt Nordberg. (eds.), Text and Talk in Professional Context, 9–22. Uppsala: ASLA.
Google Scholar

Hirano, Eliana. 2009. Research Article Introductions in English for Specific Purposes: A Comparison between Brazilian, Portuguese and English. English for Specific Purposes 28. 240–250.
Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2009. Teaching and Researching Writing. UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Google Scholar

Jalilifar, Alireza. 2010. Research Article Introductions: Subdisciplinary Variations in Applied Linguistics. Journal of Teaching Language Skills 2(2). 29–55.
Google Scholar

Jalilifar, Alireza and Nader Soleimani. 2011. Communicative Move in Research Article Introductions: Variations in Applied Linguistics. In Alireza Jalilifar and Esmaeel. Abdollahzadeh (eds.), Academic Research Genres in Asian Context, 447– 477. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.
Google Scholar

Jogthong, Chalermsri. 2001. Research Article Introduction in Thai: Genre Analysis of Academic Writing. University of West Virginia, Ph. D Dissertation.
Google Scholar

Johns, Ann. 2011. The Future of Genre in L2 Writing: Fundamental, but Contested, Instructional Decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing 20(1). 56–68.
Google Scholar

Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba. 2005. Rhetorical Structure of Biochemistry Research Articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3). 269–292.
Google Scholar

Keshavarz, Mohammad Hossein, Atai, Mohmmadreza and Vahid Barzegar. 2007. A Contrastive Study of Generic Organization of Research Article Introductions, Written by Iranian and Non-Iranian Writers in Applied Linguistics. Teaching English Language and Literature 1(2). 13–34.
Google Scholar

Khany, Reza and Reza Abol-Nejadian. 2010. Iranian Post-Graduate Students’ Problems in Writing Academic Research Articles. TELL 4(2). 1–26.
Google Scholar

Kwan, Becky. 2006. The Schematic Structure of Literature Reviews in Doctoral Theses of Applied Linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25. 30–55.
Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1982. The Research Paper in the Writing Course: A Non-Form of Writing. College English 44. 811–816.
Google Scholar

Lim, Jason Miin Hwa. 2012. How do Writers Establish Research Niches? A Genre-Based Investigation into Management Researchers’ Rhetorical Steps and Linguistic Mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(3). 229–245.
Google Scholar

Loi, Chek Kim. 2010. Research Article Introductions in Chinese and English: A Comparative Genre-Based Study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(4). 267–279.
Google Scholar

Lyda, Andrzej and Krystyna Warchal. 2014. Occupying Niches: Interculturality, Cross-Culturality and Culturality in Academic Research. Switzerland: Springer.
Google Scholar

Mahzari, Avishan and Parviz Maftoon. 2007. A Contrastive Study of the Introduction Section of English and Persian Medical Research Articles. Iranian Journal of Language Studies 3. 201–214.
Google Scholar

Moore, Tim and Janne Morton. 1999. Authenticity in the IELTS Academic Module Writing Text. In Rod Tulloch (ed.) IELTS Research Reports Canberra, Vol. 2. Australia.
Google Scholar

Moreno, Ana. 2010. Researching into English for Research Publication Purposes from an Applied Intercultural Perspective. In Miguel Ruiz-Garrido, Silveira Palmer and Ina Fortanet-Gómez (eds.), English for Professional and Academic Purposes, 59–73. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.
Google Scholar

Ozturk, Ismet. 2007. The Textual Organization of Research Article Introductions in Applied Linguistics: Variability within a Single Discipline. English for Specific Purposes 26(1). 25–38.
Google Scholar

Pillai, Anitha Devi. 2012. Discourse Analysis of Research Papers and the Acculturation Experiences of Novice Writers in a University Foundation Program. University of Singapore, Ph. D Dissertation.
Google Scholar

Samraj, Betty and John Swales. 2000. Writing in Conservation Biology: Searching for an Interdisciplinary Rhetoric? Language and Learning Across the Disciplines 3. 36–56.
Google Scholar

Samraj, Betty. 2002a. Texts and Contextual Layers: Academic Writing in Content Courses. In Ann John (ed.), Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives, 163–176. Mawah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Samraj, Betty. 2002b. Introductions in Research Articles: Variations across Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21(1). 1–17.
Google Scholar

Samraj, Betty. 2004. Discourse Features of the Student-Produced Academic Research Paper: Variations across Disciplinary Courses. English for Specific Purposes 3. 5–22.
Google Scholar

Samraj, Betty. 2005. An Explanation of Genre Set: Research Article Abstracts and Introductions in two Disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 24. 141–156.
Google Scholar

Samraj, Betty. 2008. A Discourse Analysis of Master’s Theses across Disciplines with a Focus on Introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1). 55–67.
Google Scholar

Shehzad, Wasima. 2007a. How to End an Introduction in a Computer Science Article? A Corpus-Based Approach. In Eileen Fitzpatrick (ed.), Corpus Linguistics beyond the Word: Research from Phrase to Discourse, 243–255. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Google Scholar

Shehzad, Wasima. 2008. Move Two: Establishing a Niche. Iberica 15. 25–50.
Google Scholar

Sheldon, Elena. 2011. Rhetorical Differences in RA Introductions Written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10. 238–251.
Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2005. Corpus and Text: Basic Principles. In Martin Wynne (ed.), Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice, 1–16. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
Google Scholar

Skelton, John. 1994. Analysis of the Structure of Original Research Papers: An Aid to Writing Original Papers for Publication. British Journal of General Practice 44. 455–459.
Google Scholar

Swales, John and Hazem Najjar. 1987. The Writing of Research Article Introductions. Written Communication 4. 175–192.
Google Scholar

Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Swales, John and Christine Feak. 2004. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar

Swales, John. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Taylor, Gordon and Tingguang Chen. 1991. Linguistic, Cultural, and Subcultural Issues in Contrastive Discourse Analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese Scientific Texts. Applied Linguistics 12(3). 319–336.
Google Scholar

Walvoord, Barbara and Lucille McCarthy. 1990. Thinking and Writing in College: A Naturalistic Study of Students in four Disciplines. Urbana: National Council of Teachers.
Google Scholar