Tentative Reference Acts? ‘Recognitional Demonstratives’ as Means of Suggesting Mutual Knowledge – or Overriding a Lack of It
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0033-xAbstract
In an explorative study on German oral corpus data we investigate recognitional use of proximal demonstratives as a means of explicit speaker-hearer interaction shaping the discourse structure. We show that recognitionals mark tentative reference acts in that speakers suggest - or pretend - mutual knowledge of the referent, at the same time appealing to the hearers to accept the reference. Hearers may tacitly or explicitly accept the referential act or deny it asking for clarification, in the latter case making speakers change the intended local discourse topic. On these grounds we argue against a differentiation between recognitional and indefinite demonstratives, subsuming both as kinds of recognitional use under ‘pretended’ cognitive proximity.
References
Auer, Peter. 1981. “Zur Indexikalitätsmarkierenden Funktion der demonstrativen Artikelform in deutschen Konversationen”. In G. Hindelang & W. Zillig (eds.), Sprache = Verstehen und Handeln (301-310). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1984. “Referential problems in conversation”. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 627-648.
Google Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria. 2009. Rechte Satzperipherie im Diskurs. NP-Rechtsversetzungim Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Google Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria & Manfred Consten. 2007. “The role of discourse topic and proximity for demonstratives in German and Russian”. In B. Behrens et al. (eds.), Special issue of Language in Contrast 7/2 (219-240). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Bosch, Peter. 1983. Agreement and anaphora. A study of the roles of pronouns indiscourse and syntax. London/N.Y.: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Bosch, Peter & Carla Umbach. 2007. “Reference Determination for Demonstrative Pronouns”. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 48, 39-51.
Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Fischer.
Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 1997. The meaning of topic and focus: the 59th street bridge accent. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Consten, Manfred. 2003. “Towards a unified model of domain-bound reference”. In F. Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person (223-248). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Consten, Manfred. 2004. Anaphorisch oder deiktisch? Zu einem integrativen Modell domänengebundener Referenz. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Consten, Manfred & Maria Averintseva-Klisch. 2010. “'Nahe Referenten' - ein integrativer Ansatz zur Funktion demonstrativer Referenz”. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik, 20/1, 1-34.
Google Scholar
Consten, Manfred & Monika Schwarz-Friesel. 2007. “Anapher”. In L. Hoffmann (ed.), Wortarten des Deutschen (265-292). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: form, function, and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 1991. Deixis und Textsorten im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1982. “Anaphora and deixis: same, similar or different?”. In R. Jarvella & W. Klein (eds.), Speech, place and action (315-339). Chichester: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Google Scholar
Hausendorf, Heiko. 2003. “Deixis and speech situation revisited: the mechanism of perceived perception”. In F. Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person (249-269). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1996. “Demonstratives in narrative discourse: a taxonomy of universal uses”. In B. Fox (ed.), Studies in anaphora (205-254). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase. Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Ionin, Tanya. 2006. “This is definitely specific: specificity and definiteness in article systems”. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 175-234.
Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1974. “Remarks on this and that”. Chicago Linguistic Society, 10, 345-356.
Google Scholar
Lenz, Friedrich. 1997. Diskursdeixis im Englischen. Sprachtheoretische Überlegungen und lexiko-grammatische Analysen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Maaß, Christiane. 2010. Diskursdeixis im Französischen. Eine korpusbasierte Studie zu Semantik und Pragmatik diskursdeiktischer Verweise. Berlin et al.: de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Maclaran, Rose. 1980. “On two asymmetrical uses of the demonstrative determiners in English”. Linguistics, 18, 803-820.
Google Scholar
Molnár, Krisztina. 2010. “Anamnestische Verwendung der Demonstrativa im Deutschen und im Ungarischen”. Deutsche Sprache, 4/10, 326-344.
Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2002. “Die Indexikalität der Referenz in der sozialen Interaktion”. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 125, 79-113.
Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. ¹°2002. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. Alan & Walter F.W. Lohnes (eds.) (1984). Grunddeutsch. Texte zur gesprochenen deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. “On the inferencing of indefinite-this NPs”. In A. Joshi, B. Webber & I. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (231-250). Cambridge: CUP.
Google Scholar
Sachs, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation”. Language, 50, 696-735.
Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter. 1950. “On referring”. Mind, 59, 320-344.
Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus. 2011. “Specificity”. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn & P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: de Gruyter. (Ms. under www.ilg.uni-stuttgart.de/vonHeusinger/pub).
Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus, Sofiana Chiriacescu & Annika Deichsel. 2010. “Two specific indefinite articles in German”. Handout, invited lecture at the University of Santa Cruz, California (people.ucsc.edu/~abrsvn/handout_11.pdf).
Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory & Betty Birner. 1995. “Definiteness and the English existential”. Language, 71/4, 722-742.
Google Scholar
Windisch, Ernst. 1869. Untersuchungen über den Ursprung des Relativpronomens in den idg. Sprachen. Leipzig: Melzer.
Google Scholar
Zeevat, Henk. 2004. “Asher on discourse topic”. Theoretical Linguistics, 30, 203-211.
Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Ludger Hoffmann & Bruno Strecker. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Vol. 1. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.