Exploring the Local Grammar of Evaluation: The Case of Adjectival Patterns in American and Italian Judicial Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0014Keywords:
evaluation, judicial discourse, legal language, local grammar, pattern, phraseologyAbstract
Based on a 2-million word bilingual comparable corpus of American and Italian judgments, this paper tests the applicability of a local grammar to study evaluative phraseology in judicial discourse in English and Italian. In particular, the study compares the use of two patterns: v-link + ADJ + that pattern / copula + ADJ + che and v-link + ADJ + to-infinitive pattern / copula + ADJ + verbo all’infinito in the disciplinary genre of criminal judgments delivered by the US Supreme Court and the Italian Corte Suprema di Cassazione. It is argued that these two patterns represent a viable and efficient diagnostic tool for retrieving instances of evaluative language and they represent an ideal starting point and a relevant unit of analysis for a cross-language analysis of evaluation in domainrestricted specialised discourse. Further, the findings provided shed light on important interactions occurring among major interactants involved in the judicial discourse.
References
Barnbrook, Geoff. 2002. Defining Language: A Local Grammar of Definition Sentences. John Benjamins Publishing Company
Bednarek, Monika (2007) Local Grammar and Register Variation: Explorations in Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspaper Discourse. ELR Journal, 1 (1)
Biber, Douglas (2006). University Language. A corpus-based study of spoken and written language. John Benjamins Publishing Company
Chafe, Wallace and Nichols, Johanna (eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan. & Manning, Elizabeth. (1996). Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins
Francis, Gill, Hunston, Susan. & Manning, Elizabeth. (1998). Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław (2007) Pattern and Meaning in Judicial Argumentation. An Exploratory Study. In: Corpora and ICT in Language Studies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 155-166
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław & Pontrandolfo, Gianluca. (2013). Evaluative patterns in judicial discourse: a corpus-based phraseological perspective on American and Italian criminal judgments. In: Cheng, L. (ed.) International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse: IJLLD 3.2. http://www.ijlld.com/index.php/journal-index/2013-index/112-volume-3-issue-2-2013
Gross, Maurice (1993). Local Grammars and their Representation by Finite Automata. In (Ed) Hoey, M. Data, Description, Discourse: Papers on the English Language in Honour of John McH Sinclair. HarperCollins Publishers. pp 26-38
Harris, Zellig Sabbettai (1991). A Theory of Language and Information: A Mathematical Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Heffer, Chris (2007). Judgement in Court: Evaluating participants in courtroom discourse. In Kredens, K. and Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (eds.) Language and the Law: International Outlooks. Lodz Studies in Language series, vol. 16. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 145-179
Hunston, Susan. 1994. Evaluation and organisation in academic discourse. In Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge. 191-218
Hunston, Susan. 2004.Counting the uncountable. Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In Corpora and Discourse, A. Partington, J. Morley & L
Haarman (eds.), 157-188, Bern: Peter Lang Hunston, Susan. 2011. Corpus Approaches to Evaluation. Phraseology and Evaluative Language. New York/London: Routledge
Hunston, Susan & and Francis, Gill. (2000) Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hunston, Susan & Sinclair John. 2000. A Local Grammar of Evaluation. In: S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Oxford University Press, 74-101 Hyland, Ken and Tse, Polly. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal, In Applied Linguistics 25: 156-176
Lehrberger John.1986. Sublanguage analysis, In: R. Grishman, R. Kittredge (eds.) Analyzing Language in Restricted Domains, Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 19-38
Martin, James R. and White, Peter R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave
Mazzi, Davide. 2007. The Construction of Argumentation in Judicial Texts: Combining a Genre and Corpus Perspective. In Argumentation, 1/2007, 21-38
Mazzi, Davide. 2010. This Argument Fails for Two Reasons… A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgements. In International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Vol. 23 No. 4, 373-385
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat (1748) [1956]. De l'esprit des lois. Paris: Garnier
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat (2001). The spirits of Law. Translated by Thomas Nugent. Kitchener: Batoche Books
Ochs, Elinor. (ed.). (1989). The Pragmatic of Affect. Special Issue of Text, Vol. 9
Palmer, Frank R. (1987). The English Verb 2nd Edition. London: Longman
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid and Chrarlotte Taylor (2013). Patterns and Meanings in Discourse. Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins Publishing Company
Pearson, Jennifer (1998) Terms in Context, John Benjamins Publishing Company
Pontrandolfo, Gianluca (2013). La fraseología en las sentencias penales: un estudio contrastivo español, italiano, inglés basado en corpus. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Trieste. http://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/8590?mode=full
Sinclair, John. (1988). Mirror for a text. Journal of English and Foreign Languages 1: 15-44
Taboada, Maite and Grieve, Jack. (2004). Analyzing appraisal automatically. In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text. Stanford. March 2004. 158-161
Thompson, G. and Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: an introduction. In S. Hunston and G
Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1-27
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
