Sentence Adverbials and Evidentiality

Authors

  • Milada Hirschová Charles University, Prague

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0022-8

Keywords:

evidentiality, semantics, pragmatics, Chech

Abstract

The paper deals with expressions of evidence (originating in perception, inference or reported information) and their role in sentence/utterance pragmatic modification. It concentrates on the role of the so-called sentence adverbials, showing them as scoping / focussing elements the main function of which is a/ to mark focus of an utterance b/ to support speaker´s reasoning. Formal properties of evidential expressions are dissimlar to that point that they cannot be comprised into a unified category.

 

Author Biography

  • Milada Hirschová, Charles University, Prague

    Milada Hirschová teaches pragmatics and syntax of Czech at the Department of Czech language at the Faculty of Education, Charles University in Prague. Her research interests are syntax – pragmatics and semantics – pragmatics interface as well as speech acts theory with respect to Czech and other Slavic languages.

References

Aikhenvaldo, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford : OUP. ISBN 0-19-926-585-4.

Chrakovskij, Viktor. 2005. Evidencialnosť i epistemičeskaja modaľnosť. In: Modality in Slavonic Languages. New Perspectives. Eds. B. Hansen, P. Karlík. München : Verlag Otto Sagner. 2005, p. 87-94. ISBN 3-87960-916-3.

Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar 1,2. Berlin – New York : Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-015404-8.

Grepl, Miroslav – Karlík, Petr. 1998. Skladba češtiny. Olomouc : Votobia. ISBN 80-7198-281-4.

Grepl, Miroslav. 2002. Hesla Postoj mluvčího, Postoj evaluační, Postoj preferenční. In: Encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Eds. P. Karlík, M. Nekula, J. Pleskalová. Praha : Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, 2002. ISBN 80-7106-484-X.

Hoffmannová, Jana – Kolářová, Ivana. 2007. Slovo prý/prej: možnosti jeho funkční a sémantické diferenciace. In: Gramatika a korpus/Grammar and Corpora. Eds. F. Štícha, J. Šimandl. Praha : Ústav pro jazyk český AV ČR, 2007, p. 93-102. ISBN 80-86496-32-5.

Holvoet, Axel. 2005. Evidentialität, Modalität und interpretative Verwendung. In: Modality in Slavonic Languages. New Perspectives. Eds. B. Hansen, P. Karlík. München : Verlag Otto Sagner. 2005, p. 95-105. ISBN 3-87960-916-3.

Ivanová, Martina. 2011. Epistemické funkcie evidenčných operátorov v slovenčine. In: Vidy jazyka a jazykovedy. Eds. M. Ološtiak, M. Ivanová, D. Slančová. Prešov : Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove. 2011, p. 145-154. ISBN 978-80-555-0335-6

Koktová, Eva. 1986. Sentence Adverbials in a Functional Description. Amsterodam : John Benjamins. ISBN 978-1-55619- 001-8

Koktová, Eva. 1999. Word-Order Based Grammar. Berlin – New York : Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-016252-0

Palmer, Frank Robert. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge : CUP.ISBN 52-26516-9

Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 2001, 33, p. 349-358. ISSN 0378-2166

Plungian, Vladimir. A. 2005. Irrealis and modality in Russian and in typological perspective. In: Modality in Slavonic Languages. New Perspectives. Eds. B. Hansen, P. Karlík. München : Verlag Otto Sagner. 2005, p. 135-146. ISBN 3-87960-916-3

Toulmin, S.E. 1958. The Uses od an Argument. Cambridge University Press 1958

Uhlířová, Ludmila. 1979. K postavení větných příslovcí v aktuálním členění. Slovo a slovesnost 40, 1979, č. 2, p. 143-148. ISSN 0037-7031

Uhlířová, Ludmila. 1987. Knížka o slovosledu. Praha : Academia. ISBN 21-113-87

Wiemer, Björn. 2005. Conceptual Affinities and Diachronic Relationships between Epistemic, Inferential nad Quotative Functions. (Preliminary Observations on Lexical Markers in Russian, Polish and Lithuanian). In: Modality in Slavonic Languages. New Perspectives. Eds. B. Hansen, P. Karlík. München : Verlag Otto Sagner. 2005, p. 107-131. ISBN 3-87960-916-3

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hirschová, Milada. 2013. “Sentence Adverbials and Evidentiality”. Research in Language 11 (2): 131-40. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0022-8.