Like in Similes – A Relevance-Theoretic View

Ewa Wałaszewska

doi:10.2478/v10015-012-0015-7

Authors

Ewa Wałaszewska Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-012-0015-7

Abstract

The paper examines the meaning of like as used in similes in the light of relevance theory. Similes, even though superficially indistinguishable from literal comparisons, are found to be closer to metaphors. Therefore, it is proposed that like in similes is different from like employed in literal comparisons. In particular, it is claimed that, contrary to the current relevance-theoretic position on this issue, like in similes introduces an ad hoc concept. This like is seen as both conceptual and procedural and, as such, it is distinct from both the conceptual like used in literal comparisons and the procedural like functioning as a pragmatic marker. Such a solution accounts for the similarities and differences between similes, metaphors and literal comparisons.

Author Biography

Ewa Wałaszewska, Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw

Ewa Wałaszewska is Assistant Professor at the Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw. Her principal interests lie within the fields of semantics and pragmatics, including relevance theory, its applications to the study of particular linguistic phenomena as well as its theoretical implications for the investigation of human communication and cognition. She has published internationally with Cambridge Scholars Publishing and Journal of Pragmatics.

References

Andersen, Gisle (2001). Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation: A relevancetheoretic approach to the language of adolescents. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Aristotle (2007). In G. A. Kennedy (Ed.), Aristotle on Rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. (2nd ed.). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Beardsley, Monroe C. (1981). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Blakemore, Diane (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Bordería, Salvador Pons (2008). “Do discourse markers exist? On the treatment of discourse markers in relevance theory”. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1411-1434.
Google Scholar

Bredin, Hugh (1998). “Comparisons and similes”. Lingua, 105, 67-78.
Google Scholar

Carston, Robyn (2002). Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Carston, Robyn (2010). “Explicit communication and ‘free’ pragmatic enrichment”. In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (217-285). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Cruse, D. Alan (2006). A glossary of semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Google Scholar

Feder Kittay, Eva (1987). Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam (2001). Understanding figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam (2008). “How metaphors create categories – quickly”. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (67-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam & Catrinel Haught (2006), “On the relation between metaphor and simile: When comparison fails”. Mind & Language, 21, 360-378.
Google Scholar

Glucksberg, Sam & Boaz Keysar (1993). “How metaphors work”. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (401-424). (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Hernández Iglesias, Manuel (2010). “Ad hoc concepts and metaphor”. In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (173-182). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Israel, Michael, Jennifer Riddle Harding & Vera Tobin (2004). “On simile”. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (123-135). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Turner (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Leezenberg, Michiel (2001). Contexts of metaphor. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Margolis, Joseph (1957). “Notes on the logic of simile, metaphor and analogy”. American Speech, 32, 186-189.
Google Scholar

Miller, George (1993). “Images and models, similes and metaphors”. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (357-400). (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Moeschler, Jacques (2002). “Connecteurs, encodage conceptuel et encodage procédural”. Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 24, 265-292.
Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, Josie (2009). “Is a metaphor (like) a simile? Differences in meaning, effect and processing”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 125-149.
Google Scholar

Ortony, Andrew (1993). “The role of similarity in similes and metaphors”. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (342-356). (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul (2003). The rule of metaphor. The creation of meaning in language. Trans. by R. Czerny with K. McLaughlin & J. Costello. London & New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Michiko (1997). “Conceptual and procedural encoding: cause-consequence conjunctive particles in Japanese”. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 1-24.
Google Scholar

Vega Moreno, Rosa E. (2007). Creativity and convention. The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Wałaszewska, Ewa (2010). “Simile in relevance theory: Towards an alternative account”. Acta Philologica, 38, 13-19.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston (2007). “A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts”. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (230-259). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber (1993). “Linguistic form and relevance”. Lingua, 90, 1- 25.
Google Scholar

Xu, Xu (2010). “Interpreting metaphorical statements”. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1622-1636.
Google Scholar