Interlocutors-Related and Hearer-Specific Causes of Misunderstanding: Processing Strategy, Confirmation Bias and Weak Vigilance

Manuel Padilla Cruz

doi:10.1515/rela-2017-0006

Authors

Manuel Padilla Cruz University of Seville, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2017-0006

Keywords:

misunderstanding, processing strategy, confirmation bias, epistemic vigilance, hermeneutical vigilance

Abstract

Noises, similarities between words, slips of the tongue, ambiguities, wrong or false beliefs, lexical deficits, inappropriate inferences, cognitive overload, non-shared knowledge, topic organisation or focusing problems, among others, may cause misunderstanding. While some of these are structural factors, others pertain to the speaker or to both the speaker and the hearer. In addition to stable factors connected with the interlocutors’ communicative abilities, cultural knowledge or patterns of thinking, other less stable factors, such as their personal relationships, psychological states or actions motivated by physiological functions, may also result in communicative problems. This paper considers a series of further factors that may eventually lead to misunderstanding, and which solely pertain to the hearer: processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance.

References

Allport, Gordon W. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Holt & Co.
Google Scholar

Ardissono, Liliana, Boella, Guido and Rossana Damiano. 1998. A plan-based model of misunderstandings in cooperative dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48. 649-679.
Google Scholar

Bachman, Lyle F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Banks, Stephen P., Ge, Gao and Joyce Baker. 1991. Intercultural Encounters and Miscommunication. In Nikolas Coupland, Howard Giles and John M. Weimann (eds.), “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk, 103-120. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2002. A New Starting Point? Investigating Formulaic Use and Input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 189-198. doi: 10.1017/S0272263102002036
Google Scholar

Barkow, Jerome H., Cosmides, Leda and John Tooby. (eds.). 1992. The Adapted Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Bazzanella, Carla and Rossana Damiano. 1999. The Interactional Handling of Misunderstanding in Everyday Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 817-836. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00058-7
Google Scholar

Bekkering, Harold, et al. 2009. Joint Action: Neurocognitive Mechanisms Supporting Human Interaction. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 340-352. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01023.x
Google Scholar

Berger, Charles R. 2007. A Tale of Two Communication Modes: When Rational and Experiential Processing Systems Encounter Statistical and Anecdotal Depictions of Threat. Journal ofLanguage and Social Psychology 26 (3). 215-233. doi: 10.1177/0261927X06303453
Google Scholar

Bialystok, Ellen. 1993. Symbolic Representation and Attentional Control in Pragmatic Competence. In Gabriele Kasper and Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics, 43-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1992. The Metapragmatics of Politeness in Israeli Society. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History,Theory and Practice, 255-279. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Elda Weizman. 2003. Misunderstandings in Political Interviews. In Juliane House, Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (eds.), Misunderstanding in Social Life:Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk, 127-128. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Bosco, Francesca M., Bucciarelli, Monica and Bruno G. Bara. 2006. Recognition and Repair of Communicative Failures: A Developmental Perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 38. 1398-149. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.011
Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian. 1995. Speakers, Listeners and Communication. Explorations in Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Canale, Michael. 1983. From Communicative Competence To Communicative Language Pedagogy. In Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and Communication, 2-28. London: Longman.
Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter. 2009. How We Know Our Minds: The Relationship Between Mindreading and Metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2). 121-138. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000545.
Google Scholar

Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, Marianne, Dörnyei, Zoltán and Sarah Thurrell. 1995. Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Modifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics 5. 5-35.
Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. and Meredyth A. Krych. 2004. Speaking While Monitoring Addressees for Understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 50. 62-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.004
Google Scholar

Clément, Fabrice, Koenig, Melissa and Paul Harris. 2004. The ontogeny of trust. Mind & Language 19 (4). 360-379.
Google Scholar

Codó Olsina, Eva. 2002. Managing Understanding in Intercultural Talk: An Empirical Approach to Miscommunication. Atlantis 24 (2). 37-57.
Google Scholar

Dascal, Marcelo. 1999. Introduction: Some Questions About Misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 753-762. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00059-9
Google Scholar

Dua, Hans R. 1990. The phenomenology of miscommunication. In Stephen H. Riggins (ed.), Beyond Goffman, 113-139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Ehrman, Madeline. 1999. Ego Boundaries and Tolerance of Ambiguity in Second Language Learning. In Jane Arnold (ed.), Affect in Language Learning, 68-86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Escandell Vidal, María V. 1998. Politeness: A Relevant Issue for Relevance Theory. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11. 45-57.
Google Scholar

Escandell Vidal, María V. 2004. Norms and Principles. Putting Social and Cognitive Pragmatics Together. In Rosina Márquez-Reiter and María E. Placencia (eds.), Current Trends in thePragmatics of Spanish, 347-371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Ferreira, Victor S., Slevc, Robert and Erin S. Rogers. 2005. How Do Speakers Avoid Ambiguous Linguistic Expressions? Cognition 96. 263-284. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.002
Google Scholar

Friedrich, James. 1993. Primary Error Detection and Minimization (PEDMIN) Strategies in Social Cognition: A Reinterpretation of Confirmation Bias Phenomena. Psychological Review 100 (2). 298-319. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.298
Google Scholar

Furnham, Adrian and Tracy Ribchester. 1995. Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of The Concept, its Measurement and Applications. Current Psychology 14. 179-199. doi: 10.1007/BF02686907
Google Scholar

Garrod, Simon and Martin J. Pickering. 2009. Joint Action, Interactive Alignment, and Dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 292-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01020.x
Google Scholar

Gass, Susan M. and Evangeline M. Varonis. 1991. Miscommunication in Nonnative Speaker Discourse. In Nikolas Coupland, Howard Giles and John M. Wiemann (eds.), “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk, 121-145. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Allen D. 1980. Mishearings, Misunderstandings, and Other Nonsuccesses in Talk: A Plea for Redress of Speaker-Oriented Bias. Sociological Inquiry 40. 31-74.
Google Scholar

Hartman, Ernest. 1991. Boundaries in the Mind: A New Psychology of Personality. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Hays, Robert B. 1984. The Development and Maintenance of Friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1. 75-98. doi: 10.1177/0265407584011005
Google Scholar

Hinnenkamp, Volker. 2003. Misunderstandings: Interactional Structure and Strategic Resources. In Juliane House, Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (eds.), Misunderstanding in Social Life:Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk, 57-81. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

House, Juliane, Kasper, Gabriele and Steven Ross. 2003. Misunderstanding Talk. In Juliane House, Gabriele Kasper and Steven Ross (eds.), Misunderstanding in Social Life: DiscourseApproaches to Problematic Talk, 1-21. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell H. 1972. On Communicative Competence. In John B. Pride and Janet Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings, 269-293. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1989. Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness. Multilingua 8 (2-3). 223-248. doi: 10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223
Google Scholar

Janicki, Karol. 2010. Lay People’s Language Problems. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1). 73-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00229.x
Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H., Smith, Sara W. and Tanja Ludge. 2003. Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1737-1769. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)0018-1
Google Scholar

Kataoka, Kuniyoshi. 1995. Affect in Japanese Women’s Letter Writing: Use of Sentence-Final Particles Ne and Yo and Orthographic Conventions. Pragmatics 5 (4). 427-453. doi: 10.1075/prag.5.4.02kat
Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2004. Editorial: Lexical Merging, Conceptual Blending, and Cultural Crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (1). 1-26. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2004.005
Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2007. Dueling Contexts: A Dynamic Model of Meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 385-406. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004
Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. The Paradox of Communication. Socio-cognitive Approach to Pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1 (1). 50-73. doi: 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, Seeking, and Creating Common Ground. Pragmatics & Cogniton 17 (2). 331-355. doi: 10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec
Google Scholar

Keysar, Boaz. 2007. Communication and Miscommunication: the Role of Egocentric Processes. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (4). 71-85. doi: 10.1515/IP.2007.004,
Google Scholar

Keysar, Boaz and Anne S. Henly. 2002. Speakers’ Overestimation of Their Effectiveness. Psychological Science 13 (3). 207-212. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00439
Google Scholar

Klayman, Joshua. 1995. Varieties of Confirmation Bias. In Jerome Busemeyer, Reid Hartie and Douglas L. Medin (eds.), Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. The Psychology ofLearning and Motivation, 385-418. Vol. 32. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Kunda, Ziva. 1999. Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Boston: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Márquez-Reiter, Rosina. 1997. Politeness Phenomena in British English and Uruguayan Spanish: The Case of Requests. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 18. 159-167.
Google Scholar

Mascaro, Olivier and Dan Sperber. 2009. The Moral, Epistemic, and Mindreading Components of Children’s Vigilance Towards Deception. Cognition 112 (3). 367-380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012
Google Scholar

Mazzarella, Diana. 2013. ‘Optimal Relevance’ as a Pragmatic Criterion: The Role of Epistemic Vigilance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 25. 20-45.
Google Scholar

Mazzarella, Diana. 2015. Pragmatics and Epistemic Vigilance: The Deployment of Sophisticated Interpretative Strategies. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (44). 183-199.
Google Scholar

Medina, José. 2011. The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary. Social Epistemology: AJournal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 25 (1). 15-35. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2010.534568
Google Scholar

Mercier, Hugo and Dan Sperber. 2011. Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2). 57-111. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
Google Scholar

Michaelian, Kourken. 2013. The evolution of testimony: Receiver vigilance, speaker honesty and the reliability of communication. Episteme 10 (1). 37-59. doi: 10.1017/epi.2013.2
Google Scholar

Miller, Michael and Donald. Perlis. 1993. Presentations and this and that: Logic in action. In Martha C. Polson (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive ScienceSociety, 83-88. Boulder: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar

Mustajoki, Arto. 2012. A speaker-oriented multidimensional approach to risks and causes of miscommunication. Language and Dialogue 2 (2). 216-246. doi: 10.1075/ld.2.2.03mus
Google Scholar

Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2 (2). 175-220.
Google Scholar

Origgi, Gloria. 2013. Epistemic injustice and epistemic trust. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 26 (2). 221-235. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2011.652213
Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2005. Towards new politeness systems. In Juan J. Calvo Garcia de Leonardo et al. (eds.), Actas del XXVIII Congreso Internacional de AEDEAN, 385-396. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2012. Epistemic vigilance, cautious optimism and sophisticated understanding. Research in Language 10 (4). 365-386. doi: 10.2478/v10015-011-0040-y
Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2013a. Understanding and overcoming pragmatic failure in intercultural communication: From focus on speakers to focus on hearers. International Review of AppliedLinguistics in Language Teaching 51 (1). 23-54. doi: 10.1515/iral-2013-0002
Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2013b. Metapsychological awareness of comprehension and epistemic vigilance of L2 communication in interlanguage pragmatic development. Journal ofPragmatics 59 (A). 117-135. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.005
Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2014. Pragmatic Failure, Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Vigilance. Language & Communication 39. 34-50. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.08.002
Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2015. On the Role of Vigilance in the Interpretation of Puns. Humor. International Journal of Humor Research 28 (3). 469-490. doi: 10.1515/humor-2015-0068
Google Scholar

Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2016. Vigilance Mechanisms in Interpretation: Hermeneutical Vigilance. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 133 (1). 21-29. doi: 10.4467/20834624SL.15.001.4890
Google Scholar

Perlis, Donald, Purang, Khemdut and Carl Andersen. 1998. Conversational Adequacy: Mistakes are the Essence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48. 553-575. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1997.0181
Google Scholar

Reynolds, Mike. 1995. Where the Trouble Lies: Cross-cultural Pragmatics and Miscommunication. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 30. 5-15.
Google Scholar

Ryan, Jonathon and Roger Barnard. 2009. “Who Do You Mean?” Investigating Miscommunication in Paired Interactions. The TESOLANZ Journal 17. 44-62.
Google Scholar

Sebanz, Natalie and Guenther Knoblich. 2009. Prediction in Joint Action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 353-367. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x
Google Scholar

Shintel, Hadas and Boaz Keysar. 2009. Less is More: A Minimalist Account of Joint Action in Communication. Topics in Cognitive Science 1. 260-273. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01018.x
Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. 1996. Reconsidering Power and Distance. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 1-24. doi: 10.1016/0379-2166(95)00047-X
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. 1994. Understanding Verbal Understanding. In Jean Khalfa (ed.), What Is Intelligence?, 179-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. 1996. Explaining Culture. A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. 1997. Intuitive and Reflective Beliefs. Mind & Language 12 (1). 67-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1997.tb00062.x
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. (ed.). 2000. Metarepresentations. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. 2013. Speakers are Honest Because Hearers are Vigilant. Reply to Kourken Michaelian. Episteme 10 (1). 61-71. doi: 10.1017/epi.2013.7
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan and Hugo Mercier. 2012. Reasoning as a Social Competence. In Helene Landemore and Jon Elster (eds.), Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms, 368-392. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 2015. Beyond Speaker’s Meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (44). 117-149.
Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan et al. 2010. Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language 25 (4). 359-393. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1984. The Pragmatics of Cross-Cultural Communication. Applied Linguistics 5 (3). 188-195. doi: 10.1093/applin/5.3.189
Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1991. You Just Don’t Understand. Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago Press.
Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1992. That’s not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others. London: Virago Press.
Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1994. Talking from 9 to 5. Women and Men at Work: Language, Sex and Power. London: Virago Press.
Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1983. Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Linguistics 4 (2). 91-112. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.91
Google Scholar

Todd, Andrew R. et al. 2011. When Focusing on Differences Leads to Similar Perspectives. Psychological Science 22 (1). 134-141. doi: 10.1177/0956797610392929
Google Scholar

Verdonik, Darinka. 2010. Between Understanding and Misunderstanding. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 1364-1379. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.00710.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.007
Google Scholar

Weigand, Edda. 1999. Misunderstanding: The Standard Case. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 763-785. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00068-X
Google Scholar

Weizman, Elda. 1999. Building True Understanding Via Apparent Miscommunication: A Case Study. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 837-846. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00057-4
Google Scholar

Wells, John C. 1996. Accents of English 1: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 2010. Cross-cultural Communication and Miscommunication: The Role of Cultural Keywords. Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (1). 1-23. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2010.001
Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre. 1999. Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11. 127-161.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 2002. Relevance Theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 249-287.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance Theory. In Larry Horn and Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 607-632. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Yus Ramos, Francisco. 1999a. Towards a Pragmatic Taxonomy of Misunderstandings. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 38. 217-239.
Google Scholar

Yus Ramos, Francisco. 1999b. Misunderstandings and Explicit/Implicit Communication. Pragmatics 9 (4). 487-517. doi: 10.1075/prag.9.4.01yus
Google Scholar

Yus Ramos, Francisco. 2000. On Reaching the Intended Ironic Interpretation. International Journal of Communication 10 (1-2). 27-78.
Google Scholar

Zamborlin, Chiara. 2007. Going Beyond Pragmatic Failures: Dissonance in Intercultural Communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (1). 21-50. doi: 10.1515/IP.2007.002
Google Scholar

Žegarac, Vladimir. 2009. A Cognitive Pragmatic Perspective on Communication and Culture. In Helen D. Spencer-Oatey and Peter Franklin (eds.), Intercultural Interaction: AMultidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication, 31-53. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Google Scholar