Linguistically Packaging Opinion: A Quantitative Token-Based Analysis of Adjective Structures in English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.23.22Keywords:
evaluative adjectives, syntactic distribution, opinion markers, corpus linguistics, information structureAbstract
This study examines the distribution and characteristics of three linguistic structures across three different semantic types of adjectives in English: opinion-based (evaluative), mixed (dimensional), and non-opinion (objective) adjectives. While previous research has explored the perception of subjective adjectives in varied linguistic environments through experimental methods, our research provides quantitative corpus-based evidence from Universal Dependencies English corpora. The analysis focuses on three syntactic structures: modification of a noun (Adj+Noun), predicative construction with nexus (Nexus+Cop+Adj), and predicative construction with noun subject (Noun+Cop+Adj). Results reveal significant patterns: opinion adjectives display greater structural flexibility, appearing with meaningful frequency in both attributive and predicative positions, while dimensional adjectives strongly favor attributive position. The study also identifies consistent positional patterns across all adjective types, with attributive structures typically appearing later in sentences than predicative constructions. Furthermore, register variations were observed, with web language showing distinctive distributional patterns for opinion adjectives compared to more varied texts.
References
Baker, Linda and Jody L. Wagner. 1987. Evaluating information for truthfulness: The effects of logical subordination. Memory and Cognition, 15(3), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197723
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197723
Biber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 2019. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua, 18, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6
Harris, Jesse A. and Christopher Potts. 2009. Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives. Linguistics & Philosophy, 32(6), 523-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9070-5
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9070-5
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530
Kaiser, Elsi and Catherine Wang. 2021. Packaging information as fact versus opinion: Consequences of the (information-)structural position of subjective adjectives. Discourse Processes, 58(7), 617-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1838196
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1838196
Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0
Kennedy, Christopher. 2013. Two sources of subjectivity: Qualitative assessment and dimensional uncertainty. Inquiry, 56(2-3), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2013.784483
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2013.784483
Kölbel, Max. 2004. Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00081.x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00081.x
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 643-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-0596-x
Nivre, Joakim, Daniel Zeman, Filip Ginter and Francis Tyers. 2017. Universal Dependencies. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Tutorial Abstracts.
Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001
Sassoon, Galit W. 2013. A typology of multidimensional adjectives. Journal of Semantics, 30(3), 335-380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs012
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs012
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 113-150. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113
Umbach, Carla. 2016. Evaluative propositions and subjective judgments. In C. Meier & J. van Wijnbergen-Huitink (Eds.), Subjective meaning: Alternatives to relativism, 127-168. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110402001-008
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110402001-008
Vallduví, Enric and Elisabet Engdahl. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459-519. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459
Wulff, Stefanie. 2003. A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 245-282. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wul
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wul
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
