Key Components of Musical Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2013-0007Abstract
Musical discourse analysis is an interdisciplinary study which is incomplete without consideration of relevant social, linguistic, psychological, visual, gestural, ritual, technical, historical and musicological aspects. In the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, musical discourse can be interpreted as social practice: it refers to specific means of representing specific aspects of the social (musical) sphere. The article introduces a general view of contemporary musical discourse, and analyses genres from the point of ‘semiosis’, ‘social agents’, ‘social relations’, ‘social context’, and ‘text’. These components of musical discourse analysis, in their various aspects and combinations, should help thoroughly examine the context of contemporary musical art, and determine linguistic features specific to different genres of musical discourse.
References
Agawu, Kofi (2009). Music as discourse: Semiotic adventures in romantic music. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Alim, H. Samy, Awad Ibrahim & Alastair Pennycook (Eds.) (2009). Global linguistic flows: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language. New York, London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Baxter, Judith (2010). “Discourse analytic approaches to text and talk.” In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in Linguistics (117-137). London, New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Becker, Howard (2000). “The etiquette of improvisation.” Mind, culture, and activity, 7(3), 171-176.
Google Scholar
Berliner, Paul (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Bezemer, Jeff & Carey Jweitt (2010). Multimodal analysis: Key issues. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in Linguistics (180-197). London, New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings.London: Longman.
Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. (1997). “Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes.” World Englishes, 16(3), 313-319. doi: 10.1111/1467-971X.00066
Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse. London, New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. (2008). “Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice.” English for specific purposes, 27(2), 161-174.
Google Scholar
Blacking, John (1982). “The structure of musical discourse: The problem of the song text.” Yearbook for traditional music, 14, 15-23.
Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2003). “Commentary: A sociolinguistics of globalization.” Journal of sociolinguistics, 7(4), 607-623.
Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynne & Jennifer Pearson (2002). Working with specialized language: A practical guide to using corpora. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Bradby, Barbara (1990). “Do-talk and don’t-talk: The division of the subject in girlgroup music.” In S. Frith & A. Goodwin (Eds.), On record: Rock, pop, and the written word (290-314). London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Bradby, Barbara (2003). “Discourse analysis.” In D. Horn, D. Laing, P. Oliver & P. Wicke (Eds.), Continuum encyclopedia of popular music of the world (67-70).London, New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Bullz-Eye (2006). “A Chat with Richard Hughes of Keane.” Retrieved 01.05.2013 from http://www.bullz-eye.com/music/interviews/2006/keane.htm
Google Scholar
Crystal, David (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Cutler, Cecelia (2007). “Hip hop language in sociolinguistics and beyond.” Language and linguistics compass, 1(5), 519-538.
Google Scholar
Davidson, Jane W. & J.M. Good (2002). “Musical and social co-ordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study.” Psychology of music, 30, 186-201.
Google Scholar
De Nora, Tia (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
DeWall, C. Nathan, Richard S. Pond, Jr., W. Keith Campbell & Jean M, Twenge (2011). “Tuning in to psychological change: Linguistic markers of psychological traits and emotions over time in popular U.S. song lyrics.” Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 200-207.
Google Scholar
Doffman, Mark (2011). “Jammin’ an ending: Creativity, knowledge, and conduct among jazz musicians.” Twentieth-century music, 8(2), 203-225
Google Scholar
Dunyasheva, Lilia (2010). “Reflection of gender stereotypes in the song lyrics discourse of Disney animation.” Vestnik Nizhny Novgorod Linguistic University, 11, 54-63.
Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research.London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2006). Language and globalization. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Gann, Kyle (1997). American music in the twentieth century. New York: Schirmer Books.
Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise (2009). Professional discourse. London, New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Hitchcock, H. Wiley & Stanley Sadie (Eds.) (2002). New Grove dictionary of American music. 4 vols. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Hoban, Alex (2013). “Various artists - ‘Grime 2.0’.” NME reviews. Retrieved 13.05.2013 from http://www.nme.com/reviews/various-artists/14410
Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Awad El Karim M. (1999). “Becoming Black: Rap and hip hop, race, gender, identity, and the politics of ESL learning.” TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 349-369. doi: 10.2307/3587669
Google Scholar
Interview Magazine. Postmodern love: Charlotte Kemp Muhl and Sean Lennon. Retrieved 01.05.2013 from http://www.interviewmagazine.com/music/goast-of-asaber-tooth-tiger-charlotte-kemp-muhl-sean-lennon#_
Google Scholar
Kernfeld, Barry (2003). New Grove dictionary of jazz. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Kreyer, Rolf & Joybrato Mukherjee (2009). “The style of pop song lyrics: A corpuslinguistic pilot study.” Anglia-Zeitschrift fur englische Philologie, 125(1), 31-58.
Google Scholar
Kurkul, Wen W. (2007). “Nonverbal communication in one-to-one music performance instruction.” Psychology of music, 35(2), 327-362.
Google Scholar
Latham, Alison (2002). Oxford companion to music. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Mackay, Emily (2013). “Beyoncé. The O2, London, Monday, April 29.” NME reviews. Retrieved 31.05.2013 from http://www.nme.com/reviews/beyonce/14407
Google Scholar
Moore, Allan F. (2001). “Categorical conventions in music discourse: Style and genre.” Music & letters, 82(3), 209-223.
Google Scholar
Morgan, Robert P. (1982). “Theory, analysis, and criticism.” Journal of musicology, 1(1), 15-18.
Google Scholar
Mudryan, N.S. (2011). “Theoretical and methodological basis for analyzing the discourse of music.” Vestnik of Kharkov National University n.a. V.N. Karazin, 941, 89-92.
Google Scholar
Murphy, Tim (1990). “The song stuck in my head phenomenon: A melodic din in the lad.” System, 18(1), 53-64.
Google Scholar
Murphey, Tim (1992). “The discourse of pop songs.” TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 770-774.
Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L. (2011). “Multimodal discourse analysis.” In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis (120-137). London and New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Pavlovová, Milada (2013). Complex linguistic analysis of musical discourse: The genre of concert notice. Saarbrücken: LAP.
Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair (2010). “Popular cultures, popular languages, and global identities.” In N. Coupland (Ed.), The handbook of language and globalization (592-607).Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Google Scholar
Pettijohn, Terry F. & Donald F. Sacco, jr. (2009). “The language of lyrics: An analysis of popular Billboard songs across conditions of social and economic threat.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(3), 297-311.
Google Scholar
Roy, William G. (2010). Reds, whites and blues: Social movements, folk music, and race in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith (2005). Music and conversation. In D. Meill, R. MacDonald & D.J. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (45-60). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Skrebnev, Y.M. (1994). Fundamentals of English stylistics. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
Google Scholar
Solomon, Larry J. Consonance and dissonance. Music theory and analysis. Solomon’s music resources. Retrieved 12.03.2013 from: http://www.solomonsmusic.net/consonance.htm
Google Scholar
Swales, John M. (2009). “Worlds of genre - metaphors of genre.” In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (1-16). Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearing House.
Google Scholar
Tagg, Fhilip (2003). Analyzing popular music: Theory, method and practice. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina (Ed.) (2010). Languages of global hip hop. London, New York: Continuum.
Google Scholar
Q TV. Q Friday live: Paul Shaffer jam session with Luanda Jones and friends. Retrieved 01.06.2013 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQX8iBYKxNs
Google Scholar
Walser, Robert (1993). Running with the devil: Power, gender and madness in heavy metal music. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
Google Scholar
Welch, Andy (2013). “Charlie Boyer and the Voyeurs - ‘Clarietta’.” NME reviews. Retrieved 17.05.2013 from http://www.nme.com/reviews/charlie-boyer-and-thevoyeurs/14426
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
