Chunking a Transcription of a Lecture to Help Students at EAP Courses Improve their Listening Comprehension Skill(S)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.22.4.01

Abstract

Pre-sessional EAP courses in the UK welcome international students seeking admission to British universities. The official requirement for English language proficiency is typically determined by a student’s scores in the four language skills. Students' proficiency levels in these skills generally range from 5.0 to 6.5. One significant challenge faced by foreign students is in the area of listening skills. The listening comprehension classes often involve listening to lengthy lectures, during which students struggle with note-taking and answering questions. One effective instructional strategy is to provide plain text transcripts of recorded lectures. This article aims to illustrate how a lecturer segments speech and how teachers can transcribe this process and its constituent units using methodologies discussed in works such as Badio (2004), Chafe (1994, 2003), and Croft (1995). The unit of speech in these analyses is defined by a set of conceptual and phonetic criteria, and segmenting a lecture involves applying these criteria impressionistically. The resulting modified format of a plain text transcript can serve as a valuable pedagogical tool. Teachers can demonstrate to students, who may not have a background in linguistics, that a single word is not the only or primary unit of speech. They can illustrate how pauses signal new topics or how different types of intonation units are used to convey conceptualisations and regulate the flow of ideas and speech. Such focused and structured presentations enhance language acquisition and learning.

References

Ausubel, David P. 1963. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York. Grune & Stratton.
Google Scholar

Badio, Janusz 2004: Conceptual and phonetic chunking procedures of English speech. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Łódź: Łódź, Poland.
Google Scholar

Badio, Janusz 2005: The management of speech: a cognitive and corpus-based perspective. In: Kamila Ciepiela (ed.), Cognition and Language [Procesy poznawcze i język]. Piotrków Trybunalski: Naukowe Wydawnictwo Piotrkowskie. 11-23.
Google Scholar

Badio, Janusz 2011: Assessing the feasibility of the shadowing technique in testing oral production. In: Przemysław Krakowian (ed.), Łódź Papers in Language Testing. Łódź: Scholar. 61-78
Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace 1994: Discourse, consciousness and time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace 1996: How consciousness shapes language. Pragmatics and Cognition 4 (1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.4.1.04cha
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.4.1.04cha

Chafe, Wallace 1998: Language and the flow of thought. In: Michael Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 93-111. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085678-4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085678-4

Chafe, Wallace 2003: Prosodic and functional units of language. In: Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 33–43.
Google Scholar

Croft, William 2007: The origins of grammar in the verbalization of experience. Cognitive Linguistics 18, 339-382. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.021
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2007.021

Ellis, Nick 2005: At the interface: dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 305-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X

Hulstijn, Jan 2002: Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18(3), 193-223. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr207oa
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr207oa

Rumelhart, David, E. & McClelland, James L. 1986: Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, volume 1: foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001

DeKeyser, Robert 1998: Beyond focus on form: cognitive perspectives on learning and practising second language grammar. In: Doughty Catherine, Williams Jessica (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 42-63.
Google Scholar

Dulay, Heidi and Burt, Marina, K. 1973: Should we teach children syntax. Language learning 23, 24-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x

Ellis, Rod 2008: The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995: Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar

Goldman-Eisler, Frieda 1958: Speech production and predictability of the words in context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 10, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215808416261
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215808416261

Granena, Gisela & Meiselman, Raquel 2015: The impact of L1 use in L2 listening: an input/output study of Spanish Catalan bilinguals. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 265-280.
Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1985: An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1977: Procedural Semantics. Cognition 5, 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(77)90001-4
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(77)90001-4

Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983: Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen 1982: Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
Google Scholar

Lamb, Sydney 1999: Pathways of the brain: the neurological basis of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald 1987: Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Lanagacker, Ronald 1991: Foundations of cognitive Grammar, Volume 2, Descriptive applications. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald 1999: Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524

Langacker, Ronald. 2001: Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143

Langacker, Ronald. 2008: Cognitive grammar, a basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

Lantolf, James, P. & Thorne, Steven, L. 2006: Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Leont’ev, A.N.1978: Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englswood Cliffs, J.J.: Prentie Hall.
Google Scholar

Lewis, Michael 1997: Implementing the Lexical Apprroach. Hove UK: Language Teaching Publications.
Google Scholar

Lightbown, Patsy M. & Spada, Nina 1990: Studies in second language acquisition, SSLA, 12(4), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009517
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009517

Loewen, Shawn & Isbell, Daniel, R. 2017: The impact of listening while reading (LWR) on learning outcomes. System, 66, 99-109.
Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald 1997: Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

McClelland, James, Rumelhart, David & Hinton, Geoffrey, E. 1986: The Appeal of Parallel Distributed Processing. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.
Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian 2001: The competition model: the input, the context. In: Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.005
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.005

Newmark, Leonard 1966: How not to interfere in language learning. International Journal of American Linguistics 32, 77-87.
Google Scholar

Paradis, Michael 2004: A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.18
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.18

Paradis, Michael 2009: Declarative and procedural determinants of second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.40
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.40

Prabhu, Neiman, S. 1987: Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Stelma, Juurd. H. and Cameron, Lynne. J. 2007: Intonation units in spoken interaction. Text and Talk 27-3, 361-393. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.015
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.015

Swain, Merrill 2000: The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In: James P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 97-114.
Google Scholar

Terrel, Tracy D. 1977: A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning. The Modern Language Journal 61, 325-336. https://doi.org/10.2307/324551
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/324551

Vanderplank, Robert 2013: L1 effects on the perception and comprehension of L2 spoken language: A review. Language Teaching, 46(02), 212-244.
Google Scholar

Vanderplank, Robert 2016: Effects ‘of’ and effects ‘with’ captions: How exactly does watching a TV programme with same-language subtitles make a difference to language learners? Language teaching, 49(2), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000207
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000207

Vygosky, Lev, S. 1987: The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, volume 1: thinking and speaking. New York, Plenum Press.
Google Scholar

Wertsch, James. 1985: Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

University of Reading, UK: https://www.reading.ac.uk/global-study-lounge/university-of-reading-lectures/diet-and-the-immune-system-lecture
Google Scholar

Hot Potatoes: https://hotpot.uvic.ca/
Google Scholar

WS-Tools: https://lexically.net/wordsmith/
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Badio, J. (2024). Chunking a Transcription of a Lecture to Help Students at EAP Courses Improve their Listening Comprehension Skill(S). Research in Language, 22(4), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.22.4.01

Issue

Section

Articles