Pro-Peace vs. Pro-War Conceptualizations in the Language of Hungarian Propaganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.2.05Keywords:
political discourse, specialist language, propaganda, cognitive linguistics, conceptualizations, culture-specific terms, HungarianAbstract
The language of propaganda can be treated as a specialist language with its own specialized terminology. It is produced by groups of variously configured propaganda experts responsible for the creation of propaganda messages, placed at one end of the communication channel, together with its specific target audience that consumes these messages, situated at the other end of the communication channel. As a result of this specialized communication process, the language of propaganda is function-oriented and its focus is always put on the objectives that are to be achieved. These include shaping and manipulating public opinions. For these goals to be successful, the language of propaganda must be equipped with efficient and well-designed conceptualizations able to change and modify the way people think. Defined as such, the language of propaganda is not a purely linguistic construct, but a multimodal tool able to make use of the visual and audiovisual output as well. The interest in mental processes such as conceptualization lies at the very center of cognitive linguistics and the study of cognitive mechanisms responsible for various types of conceptualizations is of high priority in cognitively driven approaches to language. Another issue which makes cognitive linguistics suitable for this type of research in specialist languages is its long standing preference for multidisciplinary and multimodal phenomena. Applying the methodology of cognitive linguistics, the present paper aims at identifying and discussing the PRO-PEACE vs. PRO-WAR network of conceptualizations in the language of Hungarian propaganda, often compared in its mastery with Orwell’s newspeak or the Soviet propaganda machinery because of its power and influence. Hungary’s leading right-wing party, Fidesz-KDNP, has retained political control in Hungary ever since its landslide victory in the 2010 national elections and developed a powerful propaganda tool that is ideally customized to the culture-specific preferences of Hungarian voters. Through quantitative and qualitative analysis, this research studies linguistic expressions shaping PRO-PEACE vs. PRO-WAR conceptualizations with their rich social, historical and cultural contexts.
References
Bartmiński, J. (2009). Stereotypy mieszkają w języku. Lublin: UMCS.
Google Scholar
Benczes, R., and Ságvári, B. (2018). Life is a battlefield: Conceptualizations of life among Hungarian adults. Society and Economy, 40(4), 571-586. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2018.40.4.6
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2018.40.4.6
Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Forensic deliberations on “purposeful metaphor”. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha
Cole, R. (2022). Encyclopaedia of Propaganda. London: Routledge
Google Scholar
Di Meco, L. and S. Hesterman. (2023). A perfect propaganda machine. https://she-persisted.org ›ShePersisted_Hungary.
Google Scholar
Diesen, G. (2022). Russophobia: Propaganda in International Politics. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1468-3
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1468-3
Forni, L. (2023). The language of power and the power of language. Analysis of propaganda’s narrative in Fahrenheit 451. SN Soc Sci (2023) 3:83, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00675-x
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00675-x
Głaz, A., D. Danaher, P. Łozowski, eds. (2013). The Linguistic Worldview: Ethnolinguistics, Cognition and Culture. London: Versita https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560748
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560748
Grady, J. (2000). Cognitive mechanisms of conceptual integration. Cognitive Linguistics 11-3/4, 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.019
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.019
Grygiel, M., ed. (2017). Cognitive Approaches to Specialist Languages. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, K, P. Kornatowski, M. Lewandowski, K. Piotrowiak-Junkiert, eds. (2022). A Different Look at Trianon: Discourse, Culture, History. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Krawczak, K, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, M. Grygiel, eds. (2022). Analogy and Contrast in Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73
Krawiec, M. (2022). Conceptual Metaphors as an Organisational Framework of the Specialist Language of IT. Göttingen: V&R unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737014526
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737014526
Langacker, R. W. (1986). An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar. San Diego: University of California. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1001_1
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80007-6
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., ed. (2020). Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42734-4
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42734-4
Schröder, U. et al., ed. (2022). Metaphorical Conceptualizations: (Inter)Cultural Perspectives. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110688306
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110688306
Stanley, J. (2015) How Propaganda Works. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865802
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400865802
Wierzbicka, A. (2013). Imprisoned in English: The Hazards of English as a Default Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199321490.001.0001
Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199321490.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
