What’s Dog Got to Do With It? Motivation Behind Denominal (Animal) Verbs

Alisa Egorova; Hans-Georg Wolf

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.21.2.02

Authors

Alisa Egorova University of Potsdam
Hans-Georg Wolf University of Potsdam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.2.02

Keywords:

animal verb, denominal conversion, zero derivation, frame, metaphor, metonymy, zoosemy

Abstract

This paper investigates the motivation behind denominal conversion of animal nouns to verbs as well as their resultant senses. Upon critical consideration of previous accounts of animal verb senses and their possible sources, the argument is put forward that animal verbs are not uniform in their semantics and cannot therefore be considered a separate conceptual category or analysed as such. Previous findings are then reinterpreted from the point of view of frame-based accounts of denominal conversion. Animal verbs are shown to be generated by the same grammatical generalisations as other denominal verbs of English, with their metaphoricity appearing to be a concomitant rather than a driving factor in the grammatical act of their conversion.

References

Baeskow, Heike. 2006. Reflections on Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English. Zeitschrift Für Sprachwissenschaft, 25(2), 205–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.008

Clark, Eve V., and Clark, Herbert H. 1979. When Nouns Surface as Verbs. Language, 55(4), 767–811. https://doi.org/10.2307/412745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412745

Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus linguistics. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6

Dirven, René. 1999. Conversion as a Conceptual Metonymy of Event Schemata. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought, 275–287. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.16dir DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.16dir

Egorova, Alisa. 2022. Hunting Down Animal Verbs: An Investigation into The Mechanisms of Meaning Transfer Underlying English Verbal Zoosemy [MA thesis]. University of Potsdam. https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/55770

Kiełtyka, Robert. 2016. Various Faces of Animal Metaphor in English and Polish. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05784-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05784-3

Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. Remarks on Denominal Verbs. Complex Predicates, 64, 473–499.

Kleparski, Grzegorz. 2017. The Semantics of Dog Revisited: In Search of Phraseologically Embedded Spectral Zoometaphors. In R. Kiełtyka and A. Uberman (eds.), Evolving Nature of the English Language, 81–92. Peter Lang.

Kleparski, Grzegorz. 2013. Historical Semantics: A Sketch on New Categories and Types of Semantic Change. In J. Fisiak and M. Bator (eds.), Historical English Word-Formation and Semantics, 59–88. Peter Lang.

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001

Kövecses, Zoltán., and Radden, Günter. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37

Martsa, Sándor. 2013. Conversion in English: A cognitive Semantic Approach. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Michaelis, Laura A., and Hsiao, Allen M. 2021. Verbing and Linguistic Innovation. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 604–763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.604763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.604763

Oxford English Dictionary Online [OED]. https://www.oed.com/

Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Thornburg, Linda L. (2012). Conceptualizing Humans as Animals in English Verb Particle Constructions. Language Value, 4, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2012.4.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2012.4.4