Julian of Norwich’s a Revelation of Love: A Grounded Cognition Approach to a Late Medieval Text

Authors

  • Katarzyna Stadnik Maria Sklodowska-Curie University in Lublin image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.1.02

Keywords:

cognitive Linguistics, grounded cognition, Julian of Norwich, situated conceptualisation, sociocultural situatedness

Abstract

Julian of Norwich was a late medieval anchoress and writer, whose work, The Showings, is known for its vivid imagery and bodily resonance it prompts in the reader. The paper identifies a gap in research on the embodied aspects of Julian’s imagery. The article discusses the connection between perception, action and the grounded nature of cognition, exploring its role in structuring Julian’s text. It uses the conceptions of situated conceptualisation and sociocultural situatedness to embed the work in the visual/material culture of the Middle Ages. It reveals how the mystic construes emotionally intense images, which underpin the abstract language of the text’s final chapters. To conclude, the recent conceptions from cognitive science may expand the analytical toolkit of cognitive-diachronic research in particular, helping illuminate the interplay of language, culture, and cognition.

References

Crampton, Georgia Ronan (ed.). 1994. The Shewings of Julian of Norwich. Medieval Institute. https://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/publication/crampton-shewings-of-julian-norwich [retrieved 15 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13vdhgx

Windeatt, Barry (ed.). 1994. English Mystics of the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518812

Anderson, Miranda and Michael Wheeler (eds.). 2019. Distributed Cognition in Medieval and Renaissance Culture. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.001.0001

Anderson, Miranda; Wheeler, Michael and Mark Sprevak. 2019. Distributed cognition and the humanities. In M. Anderson, M. Wheeler (eds.), Distributed Cognition in Medieval and Renaissance Culture, 1-43. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474438131.003.0001

Baker N. Denise. 1994. Julian of Norwich’s Showings: From Vision to Book. Princeton, New York: Princeton University Press.

Bałus, Wojciech. 2017. Mieczysław Porębski: man and architecture in the iconosphere. In A. Moravánszky, J. Hopfengärtner (eds.), East West Central: re-building Europe 1950-1990 (Vol. 1), 85-98. Birkhäuser. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035608113-006

Barratt, Alexandra. 2008. ‘No such sitting': Julian Tropes the Trinity. In L. Herbert McAvoy (ed.), A Companion to Julian of Norwich. Boydell & Brewer, 42-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846156229.004

Barsalou, Lawrence. 2005. Situated conceptualization. In H. Cohen, C. Lefebvre (eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, 619-650. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044612-7/50083-4

Barsalou, Lawrence. 2009. Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B3641281–1289. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319

Barsalou, Lawrence. 2016. Situated conceptualization. Theory and applications. In Y. Coello, M. H. Fischer (eds.), Perceptual and Emotional Embodiment. Foundations of Embodied Cognition (Volume 1), 1-17. Routledge.

Barsalou, Lawrence. 2020. Challenges and Opportunities for Grounding Cognition. J Cogn. 2020 Sep 29;3(1):31. doi: 10.5334/joc.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.116

Barsalou, Lawrence; Dutriaux, Leo and Christoph Scheepers. 2018. Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.B 373: 20170144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144

Barsalou, Lawrence; Wilson-Mendenhall, Kyle; Barrett, Lisa and Christine Simmons. 2011. Grounding emotions in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105-1127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032

Blud, Victoria. 2021. Making up a mind: ‘4E’ cognition and the medieval subject. In V. Blud, J. Dresvina (eds.), Cognitive Sciences and Medieval Studies. An Introduction, 163-182. University of Wales Press.

Carruthers, Mary. 2008. The Book of Memory. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press.

Carruthers, Mary. 2009. Mechanisms for the Transmission of Culture: The Role of “Place” in the Arts of Memory. In L. Hollengreen (ed.), Translatio: Or the Transmission of Culture in the Middle Ages, 1-26. Brepols. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.ASMAR-EB.3.116

Carruthers, Mary and Jan Ziolkowski. 2002. The Medieval Craft of Memory. An Anthology of Texts and Pictures. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Collette, Carolyn. 2001. Species, Phantasms, and Images. Vision and Medieval Psychology in The Canterbury Tales. The University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.16499

Collette, Carolyn and Harold Garrett-Goodyear (eds.). 2011. The Later Middle Ages. A Sourcebook. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28510-2

Dresvina, Juliana. 2019. What Julian Saw: The Embodied Showings and the Items for Private Devotion. Religions, 10/4. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10040245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10040245

Dresvina, Juliana and Victoria Blud. 2021. Introduction: Cognitive science and medieval studies. In V. Blud, J. Dresvina (eds.), Cognitive Sciences and Medieval Studies. An Introduction, 1-20. University of Wales Press.

Eliot, Thomas Stearns. 1971/1943. Four Quartets. Harcourt Brace & Company.

Erll, Astrid. 2011. Memory in Culture. Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321670

Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.

Frank, Roslyn. 2008. Introduction. Sociocultural situatedness. In R. Frank, Roslyn, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, E. Bernárdez (eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Volume 2: Sociocultural Situatedness, 1-20. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116.0.1

Frank, Roslyn M.; Dirven, René; Ziemke, Tom and Enrique Bernárdez (eds.). 2008. Sociocultural Situatedness, De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116

Gillespie, Vincent. 2013. The colours of contemplation: Less light on Julian of Norwich. In E. Jones (ed.), The Medieval Mystical Tradition in England: Papers Read at Charney Manor, July 2011 [Exeter Symposium 8], 7-28. Boydell & Brewer.

Gillespie, Vincent and Maggie Ross.1992. The apophatic image: The poetics of effacement in Julian of Norwich. In M. Glasscoe (ed.), Medieval Mystical Tradition in England: Exeter Symposium, 5, 53-77. D. S. Brewer.

Glasscoe, Marion. 2005. Contexts for Teaching Julian of Norwich. In D. Dyas, V. Edden, R. Ellis (eds.), Approaching Medieval English Anchoritic and Mystical Texts, 85–200. Boydell & Brewer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846153679.016

Gunn, Cate. 2008. ‘A recluse atte Norwyche’: Images of Medieval Norwich and Julian’s Revelations. In. L. Herbert McAvoy (ed.), A Companion to Julian of Norwich, 32-41. Boydell & Brewer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846156229.003

Hagen, Susan K. 2004. The visual theology of Julian of Norwich. In F. Willaert (ed.), Medieval Memory: Image and Text, 145-160. Brepols. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.TEMA-EB.3.2167

Hill, Carole. 2010. Women and Religion in Late Medieval Norwich. Boydel & Brewer.

Jenkins, Nicholas and Jacqueline Watson (eds.). 2007. The Writings of Julian of Norwich: A Vision Showed to a Devout Woman and a Revelation of Love. The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Kapralski, Sławomir. 2010. Pamięć, przestrzeń, tożsamość. In S. Kapralski (ed.). Pamięć, Przestrzeń, Tożsamość, 9-46. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Kendrick, Laura. 2011. Visual texts in post-Conquest England. In A. Galloway (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Medieval English Culture, 149-171. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521856898.008

Kövesces, Zoltán. 2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127

Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More then Cool Reason: A Field’s Guide to Poetic Metaphor. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001

Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In J. Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in Syntax, 109-150. Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.07lan

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

Langacker, Roland, W. 2017. Cognitive Grammar. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 262-283. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316339732.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.018

Marchese, Francis. 2014. The Gothic Cathedral: An Immersive Information Visualization Space. 18th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV), Paris, France, 220-224. doi: 10.1109/IV.2014.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2014.16

Robbins, Philip and Murat Aydede. 2009. A short primer on situated cognition. In P. Robbins, M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, 3-10. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.001

Salih, Sarah. 2021. Julian of Norwich, the Carrow Psalter and Embodied Cinema. In H. Powell, C. Saunders (eds.), Visions and Voice Hearing in Medieval and Early Modern Contexts, 147-174. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52659-7_7

Saunders, Corinne. 2016. Voices and vision: Mind, body and affect in medieval writing. In A. Whitehead, A. Woods, S. Atkinson, J. Macnaughton, J. Richards (eds.), The Edinburgh Companion to the Critical Medical Humanities, 411-427. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Scott-Stokes, Charity. 2006. Women’s Books of Hours in Medieval England. D.S. Brewer.

Sparavigna, Amelia. 2014. Robert Grosseteste’s thought on light and form of the world. International Journal Of Sciences, Vol. 3(4), 54-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.18483/ijSci.486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18483/ijSci.486

Spearing, Elizabeth (translator). 1998. Julian of Norwich: Revelations of Divine Love. Penguin.

Stadnik, Katarzyna. 2015. Language as a memory carrier of perceptually-based knowledge. Selected aspects of imagery in Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale And Troilus And Criseyde. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 41 (1):127-141. DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2015-0024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0024

Stockwell, Peter. 2009. Texture. A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748631209

Stockwell, Peter. 2020. Cognitive Poetics. An Introduction. Second edition. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367854546

Trepczyński, Marcin. 2017. Światło jako arché świata. Metafizyka światła Roberta Grosseteste. Ethos, 30, nr 3(119), 93-115. DOI 10.12887/30-2017-3-119-07

Turner, Denys. 1995. The Darkness of God. Negativity in Christian Mysticism. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583131

Turner, Denys. 2011. Julian of Norwich, Theologian. Yale University Press.

Windeatt, Barry. 2008. Julian’s second thoughts: The long text tradition. In L. Herbert McAvoy (ed.), A Companion to Julian of Norwich, 101-115. Boydell & Brewer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781846156229.009

Windeatt, Barry (translator). 2015. Revelations of Divine Love. Oxford University Press.

Wen, Xu and John Taylor. 2021. Cognitive linguistics: Retrospect and prospect. In X. Wen, J. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 1-15. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-1

Vereza, Solange; Coelho, Puente and Raquel Luz. Embodied cognition in ‘black metaphors’: the BAD IS DARK metaphor in biblical texts. Signo, Santa Cruz do Sul, v. 42, n. 75, dez. 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17058/signo.v42i75.9962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v42i75.9962

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Stadnik, Katarzyna. 2023. “Julian of Norwich’s a Revelation of Love: A Grounded Cognition Approach to a Late Medieval Text”. Research in Language 21 (1): 21-42. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.21.1.02.