Modality-Independent Effects of Phonological Neighborhood Structure on Initial L2 Sign Language Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0022Keywords:
American Sign Language, neighborhood density, lexical acquisition, second language, M2L2Abstract
The goal of the present study was to characterize how neighborhood structure in sign language influences lexical sign acquisition in order to extend our understanding of how the lexicon influences lexical acquisition in both sign and spoken languages. A referentmatching lexical sign learning paradigm was administered to a group of 29 hearing sign language learners in order to create a sign lexicon. The lexicon was constructed based on exposures to signs that resided in either sparse or dense handshape and location neighborhoods. The results of the current study indicated that during the creation of the lexicon signs that resided in sparse neighborhoods were learned better than signs that resided in dense neighborhoods. This pattern of results is similar to what is seen in child first language acquisition of spoken language. Therefore, despite differences in child first language and adult second language acquisition, these results contribute to a growing body of literature that implicates the phonological features that structure of the lexicon is influential in initial stages of lexical acquisition for both spoken and sign languages. This is the first study that uses an innovated lexicon-construction methodology to explore interactions between phonology and the lexicon in L2 acquisition of sign language.
References
Ann, J. (2006). Frequency of Occurrence and Ease of Articulation of Sign Language Handshapes. Gallaudet University Press.
Google Scholar
Bochner, J. H., Christie, K., Hauser, P. C., & Searls, J. M. (2011). When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning, 61(4), 1302-1327.
Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (1998). A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). Phonological priming in children's picture naming. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 335-366.
Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Gutiérrez-Sigut, E., Baquero, S., & Corina, D. (2008). Lexical processing in Spanish sign language (LSE). Journal of Memory and Language, 58(1), 100-122.
Google Scholar
Caselli, N. K., & Cohen-Goldberg, A. M. (2014). Lexical access in sign language: A computational model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-11.
Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children’s lexicons. Journal of child Language, 17(1), 205-215. These in pink bundle as rebuttals; consider them as a unit.
Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1995). An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children's receptive vocabularies. Journal of Child Language, 22, 727-735.
Google Scholar
Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological review, 119(2), 417.
Google Scholar
De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2003). Phonological neighbourhood density effects in a rhyme awareness task in five-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 695-710.
Google Scholar
Demke, T. L., Graham, S. A., & Siakaluk, P. D. (2002). The influence of exposure to phonological neighbours on preschoolers' novel word production. Journal of child language, 29(2), 379-392.
Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2006). Individual differences in second language acquisition. AILA review, 19(1), 42-68.
Google Scholar
Fletcher, P., & MacWhinney, B. (Eds.). (1996). The handbook of child language. Blackwell Publishing.
Google Scholar
Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and language, 45(3), 468-492.
Google Scholar
Gaskell, M. G. and N. Dumay (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition, 89, 105-132.
Google Scholar
Gierut, J. A., & Morrisette, M. L. (2012). Age of word acquisition effects in treatment of children with phonological delays. Applied psycholinguistics, 33(01), 121-144.
Google Scholar
Hanley, J. A., Negassa, A., & Forrester, J. E. (2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. American journal of epidemiology, 157(4), 364-375.
Google Scholar
Hardin, J. W. (2005). Generalized estimating equations (GEE). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Google Scholar
Holt, C. C. (2004). Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. International Journal of Forecasting, 20(1), 5-10.
Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (2011). Second language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 277-286.
Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning.
Google Scholar
Leach, L., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words. Cognitive psychology, 55(4), 306-353.
Google Scholar
Lee, J. L., Everitt, B. J., & Thomas, K. L. (2004). Independent cellular processes for hippocampal memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Science, 304(5672), 839-843.
Google Scholar
Liddell, S. K., & Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64(1), 195-277.
Google Scholar
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and hearing, 19(1), 1.
Google Scholar
Marentette, P. F., & Mayberry, R. I. (2000). Principles for an emerging phonological system: A case study of early ASL acquisition. Language acquisition by eye, 71-90.
Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I. (2010). Early Language Acquisition and Adult Language Ability: What Sign Language Reveals About the Critical. The Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, 2, 281.
Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., & Witcher, P. (2005). Age of acquisition effects on lexical access in ASL: Evidence for the psychological reality of phonological processing in sign language. In 30th Boston University conference on language development.
Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (Ed.). (2013). Second Language Acquisition in Childhood: Volume 2: School-age Children. Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1970). The acquisition of language: The study of developmental psycholinguistics.
Google Scholar
Meier, R. P. (2000). Shared motoric factors in the acquisition of sign and speech. The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 333-356.
Google Scholar
Metsala, J. L. (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25(1), 47-56.
Google Scholar
Morford, J. P., & Carlson, M. L. (2011). Sign perception and recognition in non-native signers of ASL. Language Learning and Development, 7(2), 149-168.
Google Scholar
Newport, E. L., & Meier, R. P. (1985). The acquisition of American Sign Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Google Scholar
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1), 8-13.
Google Scholar
Pichler, C. D. (2011). Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In G. Mathur & D. J. Napoli (Eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language (pp. 96-121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (2004). Beginning L2 Production Errors in ASL Lexical Phonology. Sign Language and Linguistics, 7, 31-61.
Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language (Vol. 32). Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Showalter, C.E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29(2), 185- 200.
Google Scholar
Showalter, C.E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35.
Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (2014). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 4). Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Stamer, M. K., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2012). Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(03), 490-502.
Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children*. Journal of child language, 38(01), 1-34.
Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1321.
Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2003). Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 46(6).
Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2011). The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(2), 191-211.
Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L., & Morrisette, M. L. (2002). The Lexicon and PhonologyInteractions in Language Acquisition. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33(1), 24-37.
Google Scholar
Storkel, H.L. (2004a). Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 201-221.
Google Scholar
Storkel, H. L. (2004b). Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1454-1468.
Google Scholar
Storkel, H.L. (2006). Do children still pick and choose? The relationship between phonological knowledge and lexical acquisition beyond 50 words. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20 (7-8), 523-529.
Google Scholar
Tamminen, J., & Gaskell, M. G. (2008). Newly learned spoken words show long-term lexical competition effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 361-371.
Google Scholar
Van der Kooij, E. (2002). Phonological Categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. The Role of Phonetic Implementation and Iconicity. LOT, Utrecht.
Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S. (2003). The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17(6), 487-499.
Google Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374-408.
Google Scholar
Williams, J.T., & Newman, S.D. (in review) Visual Sonority and Handshape Markedness Influence L2 Acquisition of American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript: in review.
Google Scholar
Winke, P. M. (2007). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(01), 143-144.
Google Scholar
Zamuner, T.S. (2009). The structure and nature of phonological neighbourhoods in children’s early lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 36, 3-21.
Google Scholar
