The Interaction of Yer Deletion and Nasal Assimilation in Optimality Theory

Authors

  • Karolina Iwan Uniwersytet Warszawski

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0019

Keywords:

Optimality Theory, Derivational Optimality Theory, opacity

Abstract

The problem of opacity presents a challenge for generative phonology. This paper examines the process of Nasal Assimilation in Polish rendered opaque by the process of Vowel Deletion in Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky, 1993), which currently is a dominating model for phonological analysis. The opaque interaction of the two processes exposes the inadequacy of standard Optimality Theory arising from the fact that standard OT is a non-derivational theory. It is argued that only by introducing intermediate levels can Optimality Theory deal with complex cases of opaque interactions.

References

Archangeli, D., & Suzuki, K. (1997). The Yokuts challenge. Derivations and Constraints in Phonology. In I. Roca (Ed.), (pp. 197-226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Booij, G. E. (1997). Non-derivational phonology meets Lexical Phonology. Derivations and Constraints in Phonology. In I. Roca (Ed.), (pp. 261-288). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Cole, J. S., & Kisseberth C. W. (1995). Restricting multi-level constraint evaluation: Opaque rule interaction in Yawelmani vowel harmony. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
Google Scholar

Gussmann, E. (1980). Introduction to phonological analysis. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Jarosz, G. (2006). Polish Yers and the Finer Structure of Output-Output Correspondence. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 31, 181-192.
Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. The structure of phonological representations, In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), part 1, (pp. 131-175). Dodrecht: Foris.
Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1997). LP and OT. Handout, LSA Summer Linguistic Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (2000). Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review, 17, 351-367.
Google Scholar

Laskowski, R. (1975). Studia nad morfonologią współczesnego języka polskiego. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Google Scholar

Lightner, T. M. (1963). Preliminary Remarks on the Morphophonemic Component of Polish. Quarterly Progress Report, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, 71, 220-235.
Google Scholar

Lightner, T. M. (1972). Problems in the Theory of Phonology. Russian phonology and Turkish phonology. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.
Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. (1996). Remarks on phonological opacity in Optimality Theory. Studies in Afroasiatic Grammar. Papers from the Second Conference on Afroasiatic Linguistics, Sophia Antipolis. In J. Lacarne, J. Lowenstamm & U. Shlonsky (Eds.), (pp. 215-243). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. J. (1999). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology, 16, 331-399.
Google Scholar

Orgun, C. O. (1996). Correspondence and identity constraints in two-level Optimality Theory. Proceedings of WCCFL 14. In J. Camacho, L. Choueiri & M. Watanabe (Eds.), (pp. 399-413). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Google Scholar

Prince, A., & Smolensky P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, and University of Colorado, Boulder.
Google Scholar

Rowicka, G. (1999). On Ghost Vowels: A Strict CV Approach. Ph.D. diss., LOT/University of Leiden: Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (1984). Cyclic and Lexical Phonology. The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (1986). Abstract vowels in three dimensional phonology: the yers. The Linguistic Review, 5, 247-280.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (1997a). Polish voice assimilation in Optimality Theory. Rivista di linguistica, 9, 291-342.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (1997b). Extrasyllabic consonants in Polish: Derivational Optimality Theory. Derivations and constraints in Phonology. In I. Roca (Ed.), (pp. 551-581). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2000a). Backness switch in Russian. Phonology, 17, 39-64.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2000b). Glide and glottal stop insertion in Slavic languages: A DOT analysis. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 271-317.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2003a). Polish Palatalization in Derivational Optimality Theory. Lingua, 113, 197-237.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2003b). Duke-of-York Derivations in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 601-629.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2004a). Posterior Stridents in Korean and Russian. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 10, 145-167.
Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2004b). Derivational in Optimality Theory: A Reply to Burzio. Linguistic Inquiry, 35, 656-670.
Google Scholar

Scheer, T. (2006). How yers made Lightner, Gussmann, Rubach, Spencer and others invent CVCV. Studies in Constraint-based Phonology. In P. Bański, B. Lukaszewicz, & M. Opalińska (Eds.), (pp. 133-207). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar

Szpyra, J. (1992). Ghost Segments in Nonlinear Phonology: Polish Yers. Language, 68, 277-312.
Google Scholar

Yearley, J. (1995). Jer Vowels in Russian. Papers in Optimality Theory. In J. N. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), (pp. 533-571). Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

How to Cite

Iwan, K. (2015). The Interaction of Yer Deletion and Nasal Assimilation in Optimality Theory. Research in Language, 13(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0019

Issue

Section

Articles