The Pragmatics of Person and Imperatives in Sign Language of the Netherlands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2013-0010Keywords:
sign language, pragmatics, imperatives, pointing, personAbstract
We present new evidence against a grammatical distinction between second and third person in Sign Language of The Netherlands (NGT). More precisely, we show how pushing this distinction into the domain of pragmatics helps account for an otherwise puzzling fact about the NGT imperative: not only is it used to command your addressee, it can also express ‘non-addressee-oriented commands’.
References
Alibašić Ciciliani, Tamara & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 2006. Pronominal system in Croatian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 9(1/2). 95–132.
Berenz, Norine. 2002. Insights into person deixis. Sign Language & Linguistics 5. 203-227.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2008. Missing Persons: A Case Study in Morphological Universals. The Linguistic Review 25. 203-230.
Cysouw, Michael. 2008. The expression of person and number: a typologist's perspective. Ms., Max Planck Institute EVA, Leipzig.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, 73-113. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Grice, Herbert Paul, 1975. Logic and conversation, in P. Cole & J. Morgan (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41–58, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H.P. Grice (ed.), Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 22–40, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Hoza, Jack. 2007. It's not what you sign, it's how you sign it. Washington D.C.: Gallaudet.
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mastop, Rosja. 2005. What Can You Do? Amsterdam: PhD thesis ILLC/University of Amsterdam.
McBurney, Susan, 2002. Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Language, 329-369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 175-190 Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nedjalkov, Igor. 1997. Evenki. London: Routledge.
Roush, Daniel R. 2011. Language between bodies: a cognitive approach to understanding linguistic politeness in American Sign Language. Sign Langauge Studies. 11(3). 329-374.
Rutkowski, Pawel & Malgorzata Czajkowska-Kisil. 2010. Person and space. Paper presented at the workshop Between you and me: local pronouns across modalities, Radboud University Nijmegen, 7–8 June.
Sadock, Jerrold & Arnold Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Tim Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description I, 155-196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwager, Magdalena. 2005. Interpreting Imperatives. Frankfurt: J. W. Goethe Universitat dissertation.
Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas. 2001 [1992]. Linguistics of American Sign Language, 3rd edn. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
van der Auwera, Johan, Nina Dobrushina & Valentin Goussev. 2004. A Semantic Map for Imperative-Hortatives. In Dominique Willems, Bart Defrancq, Timothy Collerman & Dirk Noel (eds.), Contrastive Analysis in Language. Identifying Linguistic Units of Comparison, 44-66. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
van der Auwera, Johan, Nina Dobrushina & Valentin Goussev. 2005. Imperative-Hortative systems. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures, 294-297. Oxford: Oxford University Press,.
Xrakovskij, Viktor S. (ed.). 2001. Typology of Imperative Constructions (Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 9). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
