Metaphorical Representation of the European Union in Political Cartoons in English and Latvian

Solveiga  Liepa; Vilma  Šaudiņa; Dmitrijs Oļehnovičs

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.19.4.04

Authors

Solveiga Liepa Daugavpils University, Latvia
Vilma Šaudiņa Daugavpils University, Latvia
Dmitrijs Oļehnovičs Daugavpils University, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.19.4.04

Keywords:

metaphor, multimodality, political cartoon

Abstract

The study is carried out in the framework of Conceptual Metaphor Theory, but since it considers political cartoons that, apart from linguistic, involve also other modes, the findings of theoreticians researching visual and multimodal metaphors are applied. The purpose of the present study is to identify and analyse the visual and multimodal metaphors encountered in cartoons focusing on the European Union matters and to find out if political events are presented in cartoons in English and Latvian on the basis of the same conceptual metaphors.

References

Bounegru, Liliana, and Charles Forceville. 2011. Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication 10(2): 209-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446

Eggertsson, Gunnar Theodór, and Charles Forceville. 2009. The HUMAN VICTIM IS ANIMAL metaphor in horror films. In: Forceville and Urios-Aparisi (eds), 429-449.
Google Scholar

El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2003. Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication 2: 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755

El Refaie, Elisabeth. 2009. Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In: Forceville and Urios-Aparisi (eds), 173-196.
Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2005. Addressing an audience: time, place, and genre. In Peter Van Straaten’s calendar cartoons. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 18: 247-278. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.3.247
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2005.18.3.247

Forceville, Charles. 2006a. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In: G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, and F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibàñez (eds). Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, 379-402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Forceville, Charles. 2007. Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. In Public Journal of Semiotics 1(1): 19-51. https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8812
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.37693/pjos.2007.1.8812

Forceville, Charles. 2008. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Jr. Gibbs (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 462-482. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.028

Forceville, Charles. 2009. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (ed.). 2008. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802

Kövecses, Zoltan. 1990. Emotion Concepts. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3312-1
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3312-1

Kövecses, Zoltan. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltan. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltan. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

Lakoff, George. 2006. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 186-238. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Turner, Mark. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001

Saraceni, Mario. 2003. The Language of Comics. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Schilperoord, Joost, and Alfons Maes. 2009. Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In: Forceville and Urios-Aparisi (eds), 213-240.
Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2009. Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In: Forceville and Urios-Aparisi (eds), 147-172.
Google Scholar