Processing Presuppositions. Are Implicative Verbs Soft Triggers?

Mateusz Włodarczyk

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.19.1.04

Authors

Mateusz Włodarczyk University of Szczecin, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.19.1.04

Keywords:

conversational implicature, implicative verbs, presuppositions

Abstract

This paper investigates the question whether implicative verbs should be considered as soft presupposition triggers, i.e., as triggers activating optional context repairs. I present the results of an experiment in which test subjects were asked to read short dialogues containing either presupposition triggers or conversational implicatures and, next, answer the questions regarding the information communicated on the level of presupposition or implicatures, respectively. The results of within-subject ANOVA show that presuppositions activated by the use of implicative verbs are significantly less accessible and illicit significantly longer response times than presuppositions activated by the use of hard triggers, suggesting that they can be classified as soft presupposition triggers. The obtained results also show that presuppositions activated by the use of different triggers are heterogenous in regards to the accessibility of information.

References

Abbott, Barbara. 2000. Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1419-1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00108-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00108-3

Abusch, Dorit. 2002. Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions. Semantics and Linguistic Theory,12, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v12i0.2867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v12i0.2867

Abusch, Dorit. 2010. Presupposition triggering from alternatives. Journal of Semantics, 27(1), 37-80.https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp009

Beaver, David, Geurts, Bart. 2014. Presupposition, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033952

Beaver, David, et al. 2017. Questions under discussion: Where information structure meets projective content. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 265-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033952

Domaneschi, Filippo. 2016. Presuppositions and Cognitive Processes: Understanding the Information Taken for Granted. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57942-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57942-3

Domaneschi, Filippo, Di Paola, Simone. 2018. The Processing Costs of Presupposition Accommodation. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 47(3), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9534-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9534-7

Von Fintel, Kai. 2008. What is presupposition accommodation, again?. Philosophical perspectives, 22(1), 137-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x

Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, C: 25–50. Sense and Reference. Translation by Max Black. The Philosophical Review 57:3, 209–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485

Geis, Michael, L., Zwicky, Arnold, M. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic inquiry, 2(4), 561-566.

Jayez, Jacques, et al. 2015. Weak and strong triggers. In Florian Schwarz (ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, 173-193. New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07980-6_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07980-6_8

Glanzberg, Michael. 2003. Felicity and presupposition triggers. University of Michigan Workshop in Philosophy and Linguistics

Glanzberg, Michael. 2005. Presuppositions, truth values and expressing propositions. In Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language, 340-358. https://doi.org/10.2307/412084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412084

Karttunen, Lauri. 2016. Presupposition: What went wrong?. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 26), 705-731. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3954

Levinson, Stephen, C. 1983. Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. In Bäuerle Rainer, Urs Egli, and Av Stechow (eds.) Semantics from different points of view, 172-187. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67458-7_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67458-7_12

Roberts, Craige. 2015. Accommodation in a language game. In Barry Loewer, and Jonathan Schaffer (eds.) A Companion to David Lewis, 345-366. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118398593.ch22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118398593.ch22

Sadock, J. 1978. On Testing for Conversational Implicature. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Volume 9: Pragmatics, 281-298. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_011

Schwarz, Florian. (Ed.). 2014. Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (Vol. 45). Springer.

Simons, Mandy. 2013. On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In Marco Carapezza, Franco Lo Piparo and Alessandro Capone (eds.) Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, 329-348. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_13

Noveck, Ira, A., Sperber, Dan. 2004. Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125

Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic Presuppositions, In Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press.

Stalnaker, Robert. 1998. On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 7(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008254815298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008254815298

Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and philosophy, 25(5), 701-721. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902

Strawson, Peter, F. 1950. On referring. Mind, 59(235), 320-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.235.320

Tiemann, Sonja, et al. 2011. Psycholinguistic evidence for presuppositions: On-line and off-line data. Proceedings of sinn and bedeutung, 15(15).

Davis, Wayne. 2019. Implicature, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .

Witek, Maciej. 2019. Accommodation in Linguistic Interaction. On the so-called triggering problem. In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophical Insights into Pragmatics, Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 163-192. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110628937-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110628937-009

Włodarczyk, Mateusz. 2019. Are Implicative Verbs Presupposition Triggers? Evidence from Polish. In Maciej Witek, Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka (eds.), Varieties and Dynamics of Speech Actions, 206-230. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366527_011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004366527_011