Visual Metaphtonymy in Automobile Femvertising

Sami Chatti

doi:10.18778/1731-7533.18.4.05

Authors

Sami Chatti University of Manouba, Tunisia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.18.4.05

Keywords:

automobile femvertising, women driving, metaphor, metonymy, visual metaphtonymy

Abstract

In a 2017 landmark reform, Saudi authorities decided to lift the ban on women driving in this conservative society. In tribute to women's newly-gained freedom to drive, major automakers turned to Twitter to launch creative femvertising campaigns that vividly articulate the female empowering motto 'driving is feminine'. Building on the eloquence of visual rhetoric, which combines the communicative force of figurative language with the expressive potential of visual imagery, automobile advertisers resorted to visual metaphtonymy to efficiently target prospective female consumers. The selection of this visual compound, which emerges from the intricate interplay between metaphor and metonymy, allows for a dynamic interaction between the highlighting function of metonymy and the mapping role of metaphoric thought to establish informed parallels between femininity and automobility. Analysis of survey data on the likeability, complexity and effectiveness of a representative sample of four digital automobile advertisements asserts the role and value of visual metaphtontonymy in automobile femvertising.

Author Biography

Sami Chatti, University of Manouba, Tunisia

Dr. Sami Chatti is an Assistant Professor of Linguistics at the University of Manouba, Tunisia, and a certified translator in English, French and Arabic. He holds a Doctorate and a Master in English Linguistics from the University of Sorbonne Nouvelle, and obtained a second Master in translation from the ESIT School of Interpreters and Translators in Paris. His research interests include cognitive semantics, translation studies and corpus linguistics. He has recently published a book on the Semantics of English Causative Verbs (Paf, 2012), and contributed several articles to specialised journals in linguistics and translation.

References

Al-Mufarreh, R. (2017). To drive or not to drive: A critical analysis of Saudi female advocates’ discourse. Unpublished doctorate thesis. University of Florida.
Google Scholar

Ang, S. H. and Low, S. M. (2000). Exploring the dimensions of ad creativity. Psychology & Marketing 17(10): 835-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:10<835::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-#
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200010)17:10<835::AID-MAR1>3.0.CO;2-#

Barcelona, A. (2000). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar

Chen, J. Yang, X. and Smith, R. E. (2016). The effects of creativity on advertising wear-in and wear-out. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 44(3): 334- 49. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-014-0414-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0414-5
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0414-5

Clarke, D. (2007). Driving Women: Fiction and Automobile Culture in Twentieth-Century America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Croft, W. (2002). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In R. Dirven & R. Porings (Eds.). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 161-205. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.161
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.161

Doumato, A. E. (1992). Gender, monarchy, and national identity in Saudi Arabia. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 19(1): 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530199208705547
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13530199208705547

El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding Visual Metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication 2(1):75-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203272305

Forceville, C. and Urios-Aparisi, E. 2009. Introduction. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366

Ford, Middle East. (2017, Sept. 27). Welcome to the driver’s seat. [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/FordMiddleEast/status/913088482838491137
Google Scholar

Jaguar, MENA. (2017, Sept. 26). The road is yours. [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/i/status/912972424815300610
Google Scholar

Hidalgo, L. and Kraljevic, B. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1):153-78. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.08hid

Hines, C. (2000). Rebaking the pie: The woman as dessert metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23

Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3): 323-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323

Kia, Aljabr. (2017, Sept. 27). Your Future is at your hands. [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/aljabr_kia/status/913336886248263681
Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphor creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 21(4): 663-97. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.021
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.021

Kövecses, Z. and Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 37-77. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001

Kemp-Robertson, P. and Barth, C. (2018) The Contagious Commandments: Ten steps to brand bravery. London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar

Lambiase, J. (2003). Sex – Online and internet advertising. T. Reichert and J. Lambiase (eds.) Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 247-69.
Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814

Lombardot, E. (2007). La nudité en publicité: Quelle influence sur l'attention portée à la fonction mémorielle de la marque? Recherche et Application en Marketing 22(4): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/205157070702200401
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/076737010702200401

Maalej, Z. A. (2001). Processing pictorial metaphors in advertising: A cross-cultural view. Academic Research 1(1): 76-84.
Google Scholar

Mårtenson, R. (2003). A note on the role of advertising in memory creation and memory reconstruction of experiences. F. Hansen and L. B. Christensen (eds.) Branding and Advertising. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press, pp. 387-409.
Google Scholar

McQuarrie, E. F. and Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22: 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1086/209459
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209459

McStay, A. (2013). Creativity and Advertising: Affect, Events, and Process. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203492208
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203492208

Meyers-Levy, J. and Malaviya, P. (1999). Consumers' processing of persuasive advertisements: An integrative framework of persuasion theories. Journal of Marketing 63: 45-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252100
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1252100

Negro, I. (2013). Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. RESLA 26: 365-84.
Google Scholar

Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2013). Metaphor use in advertising: Analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy a greenwashing advertisement. In E. Gola and F. Ervas (eds.). Metaphor in Focus: Philosophical perspectives on metaphor use. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 67-82.
Google Scholar

Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2016). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: A corpus-based account. Metaphor & Symbol 31(2):73-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150759
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150759

Pérez-Sobrino, P. Littlemore, J. and Houghton, D. (2018). The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics 40(6): 957-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy039
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy039

Phillips, B. J. and McQuarrie, E. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory 4: 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044089
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593104044089

Rannard, G. and Shukri, M. (2017 sep.22). Women have 'quarter of brain' says Saudi cleric [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-41361123
Google Scholar

Reichert, T. and Lambiase, J. (2003). One phenomenon, multiple lenses: bridging perspectives to examine sex advertising. In T. Reichert and J. Lambiase (eds.) Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1-10.
Google Scholar

Reichert, T. and Lambiase, J. (2006). Sex in consumer culture: The erotic content of media and marketing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Google Scholar

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and Otal, J. L. (2002). Metonymy, Grammar and Communication. Granada: Comares.
Google Scholar

Sawang, S. (2010). Sex appeal in advertising: What consumers think? Journal of Promotion Management 16(1-2):167-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903578832
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10496490903578832

Sengupta, J. and Dahl, D. (2008). Gender-related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology 18(1): 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.010
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.010

Smith, R. E. Chen, J. and Yang, X. (2008). The impact of advertising creativity on hierarchy of effects. Journal of Advertising 27(4):47-61. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370404
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370404

Šorm, E. and Steen, G. (2018). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. Steen (ed.) Visual Metaphor: Structure and Process. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Van Mulken, M. and Le Pair, R. (2012). Appreciation and interpretation of visual metaphors in advertising across three European countries. Metaphor in Use: Context, Culture, and Communication 38: 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.14mul
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.38.14mul

Villacanas, B. and White, M. (2013). Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in Purificacion Garcia advertising campaigns. Metaphor and the Social World 3(2): 220–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.2.06vil
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.2.06vil

Volkswagen [vwmiddleeast]. (2017, Sept. 27). Your turn to sit at the driver’s seat. [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/VWMiddleEast/status/913046189989404672
Google Scholar

Yang, X., and Smith, R, E. (2009). Beyond attention effects: Modeling the persuasive and emotional effects of advertising creativity. Marketing Science 28 (5):935-49. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0460
Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0460

Yus, F. (2009). Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In C. Forceville and E. Urios-Aparisi (eds.). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Google Scholar